Improving Elementary Science Education in a Developing Country: A Case Study from Fiji

International Journal of Educational Reform

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 133-152

  Taylor, Neil ^a,e   Maiwaikatakata, Tema ^b   Biukoto, Emele ^b   Suluma, Wili ^d   Coll, Richard K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^b Crutin University of Technology   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^d University of Leicester ^*

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC   (Fiji)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85026271436     PISSN: 10567879     EISSN: 26319675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105678790801700205     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Appleton K., (1995). Student teachers’ confidence to teach science: Is more science knowledge necessary to improve self-confidence? International Journal of Science Education, 17, 357–369.
2. Appleton K., (2002). Science activities that work: Perceptions of primary teachers. Research in Science Education, 32, 393–410.
3. Australian Science Technology and Engineering Council. (1997). Foundations for Australia's future: Science and technology in primary schools. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
4. Benavot A., (1992). Curricular content, educational expansion, and economic growth. Comparative Education Review, 36(2), 150–174.
5. Bliss J., (1995). Piaget and after: The case of learning science. Studies in Science Education, 25, 139–172.
6. Brown-Acquaye H. A., (2001). Each is necessary and none is redundant: The need for science education in developing countries. Science Education, 85(1), 68–70.
7. Cobern W. W., (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In Tobin K., (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 51–69). Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
8. Coll R. K., & Taylor N., (Eds.). (2007). Science education in context: An international perspective of the influence of context on science curriculum development, implementation and the student-experienced curriculum. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
9. Cook A., & Taylor N., (1995). The sustainability of aided curriculum development projects: The need for robust adaptive processes. Pacific-Asian Education Journal, 7(1/2), 67–71.
10. Corrigan G., & Taylor N., (2004). An exploratory study of the effect a self-regulated learning environment has on pre-service primary teachers’ perceptions of teaching science and technology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 45–62.
11. Cronin-Jones L. L., (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influences on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 235–251.
12. de Laat J., & Watters J. J., (1995a, July). Science teaching self efficacy in a primary school: A case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Bendigo, Australia.
13. de Laat J., & Watters J. J., (1995b). Science teaching self efficacy in a primary school: A case study. Research in Science Education Research, 25, 453–464.
14. Driver R., (1989a). Changing conceptions. In Adley P., (Ed.), Adolescent development and school science (pp. 79–99). London: Falmer.
15. Driver R., (1989b). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481–490.
16. Driver R., & Oldham V., (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105–122.
17. Fiji Islands Education Commission. (2000). Fiji 2020. Suva, Fiji: Government Printery.
18. Good R. G., Wandersee J. H., & St. Julien J., (1993). Cautionary notes on the appeal of the new “ism” (constructivism) in science education. In Tobin K., (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 71–87). Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
19. Gray B. V., (1999). Science education in the developing world: Issues and considerations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 261–268.
20. Greenfield T. A., (1996). Gender, ethnicity, science achievement and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 901–933.
21. Guba E. G., & Lincoln Y. S., (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Guba E. G., & Lincoln Y. S., (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin N. K., & Lincoln Y. S., (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Hacker R. G., & Rowe M. J., (1985). A study of teaching and learning processes in integrated science classrooms. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 173–183.
24. Helu-Thaman K., (1991). A letter from a curriculum officer. In Benson C., (Ed.), Report of the Pacific Curriculum Conference (pp. 98–105). Suva, Fiji: University of the South Pacific, Institute of Education.
25. Hewson M. G., (1988). The ecological context of knowledge: Implications for learning science in developing countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(4), 317–326.
26. Ingle R. B., & Turner A. D., (1981). Science curricula as cultural misfits. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 357–371.
27. Kahn M., (1990). Paradigm lost: The importance of practical work in school science from a developing country perspective. Studies in Science Education, 18, 127–136.
28. Lee O., (1995). Subject matter knowledge, classroom management, and instructional practices in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 423–440.
29. Lewin K., (1990). International perspectives on the development of science education: Food for thought. Studies in Science Education, 18, 1–23.
30. Lewin K., (1993). Planning policy on science education in developing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 1–15.
31. Macpherson C., & Taylor N., (1994). The national trial of the new standardised test of achievement in primary science for Fiji: A comparison of sub-groups performances within the sample population. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 17(1), 8–14.
32. Mant J., & Summers M., (1993). Some primary school teachers’ understanding of the Earth's place in the universe. Research Papers in Education, 8(1), 101–129.
33. Mbajiorgu N. M., & Iloputaife E. C., (2001). Combating stereotypes of the scientist among pre-service science teachers in Nigeria. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19, 55–68.
34. Millar R., (1989). Constructive criticisms. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 587–596.
35. Muralidhar S., (1989). An exploratory study of a science curriculum in action: Basic science in Fiji. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
36. Nabobo U., & Teasdale J., (1994). Teacher education for cultural identity in Fiji. Directions, 16(2), 3–13.
37. Palmer D. H., (2002). Factors contributing to attitude exchange amongst pre-service elementary teachers. Science Education, 86(1), 122–138.
38. Patton M. Q., (2000). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Perkes V. A., (1975). Relationships between a teacher's background and sensed adequacy to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12, 85–88.
40. Russell T., Bell D., McGuigan L., Qualter A., Quinn J., & Schilling M., (1992). Teachers’ conceptual understanding in science: Needs and possibilities in the primary phase. Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(2/3), 129–143.
41. Rutherford F. J., (1987). The character of elementary school science. Science and Children, 24(4), 8–11.
42. Schoon K. J., & Boone W. J., (1998). Self-efficacy and alternate conceptions of science of pre-service elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553–568.
43. Solomon J., (1995). Higher level understanding of the nature of science. School Science Review, 76(276), 15–22.
44. Stewart R. A. C., (1983). Fijian education: Its specials demands. Directions, 10, 12–26.
45. Summers M., & Kruger C., (1994). A longitudinal study of a constructivist approach to improving primary school teachers’ subject matter knowledge in science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 499–519.
46. Symington D., (1980). Primary school teachers’ knowledge of science and its effect on choice between alternative verbal behaviours. Research in Science Education, 10, 69–76.
47. Tavola H., (1992). Race is not the only issue in education in Fiji. Directions, 14(2), 34–40.
48. Taylor N., (1991). The Fiji Junior Certificate Basic Science examination: Its implications for the teaching of science in Fiji. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 14(2), 73–78.
49. Taylor N., (1997). Fiji pre-service primary teachers’ understanding of physical science: A cultural perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
50. Taylor N., & Coll R., (1999). Pre-service primary teachers’ self efficacy in science teaching: The Fiji perspective. Pacific-Asian Education Journal, 11(1), 32–45.
51. Taylor N., & Lucas K., (2001). Some learning outcomes from a science program for pre-service primary teachers undertaken in the context of a developing country. Evaluation and Research in Education, 15(4), 228–249.
52. Taylor N., Lucas K., & Watters J. J., (1999). Collaborative science activities and the social construction of understanding of physical science concepts by pre-service teachers in Fiji. Research in Science Education, 29(4), 479–500.
53. Taylor N., & Macpherson C. M., (1992a). Developing the Standardised Test of Achievement in Science for Fiji. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 15(1), 19–30.
54. Taylor N., & Macpherson C. M., (1992b). Primary science in Fiji: Some reflections on activity-based lessons. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 15(2), 40–45.
55. Taylor N., Vlaardingerbroek B., & Coll R. K., (2003). Exploiting curriculum commonality in small island states: Some strategies for primary science curriculum development in the South Pacific. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 157–174.
56. Tilgner P. J., (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74(4), 421–431.
57. Tobin K., & Tippins D., (1993). Constructivism: A paradigm for the practice of science education. In Tobin K., (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3–21). Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
58. Vulliamy G., (1988). Third world schools. In Briceno S., & Pit D. C., (Eds.), New ideas in environmental education (pp. 143–157). London, UK: Croom Helm.
59. Wheatley G. H., (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9–21.