Segmented animals: Origins, relationships, and functions: An introduction to the symposium on metamerism (57th. UZI Congress, San Benedetto del Tronto, 22–26 september 1996)

Italian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-4

  Minelli, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Annelid arthropod relationships; Ecdysozoa; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85024545085     PISSN: 11250003     EISSN: 17485851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11250009809386721     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aguinaldo, A. M. A., Turbeville, J. M., Linford, L. S., Rivera, M. C., Garey, J. R., Raff, R. A., and Lake, J. A., 1997. Evidence for a clade of nema-todes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature, 357:489–493.
2. Balavoine, G., 1997. The early emergence of platyhelminths is contradicted by the agreement between 18S rRNA and Hox genes data. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la vie/Life Sciences, 320:83–94.
3. Beklemishev, W. N., 1969. Principles of comparative anatomy of invertebrates, London:Oliver and Boyd. (transl. of the 3rd Russian ed., 1964).
4. Berto, D., Fusco, G., and Minelli, A., 1997. Segmental units and shape control in Chilopoda. Entomol. Scand., 51 (suppl.):61–70.
5. Boero, F., Gravili, C., Pagliara, P., Piraino, S., Bouillon, J., and Schmid, V., 1998. The cnidarian premises of metazoan evolution. Ital. J. Zool., 65:5–9.
6. Brölemann, H. W., 1921. Principe de contraction contre principe d'élongation. Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Toulouse, 49:340–359.
7. Brölemann, H. W., 1932. La contraction tachygénétique des polydesmiens (Myriapodes) et leurs affinités naturelles. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., 57:387–396.
8. Budd, G., 1996. The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the Arthropod stem group. Lethaia, 29:1–14.
9. Clark, R. B., 1964. Dynamics in metazoan evolution:The origin of the coelom and segments, Oxford:Clarendon Press.
10. Colosi, G., 1956. Zoologia e biologia generale, Torino:UTET.
11. Conway Morris, S., 1994. Why molecular biology needs palaeontology. Development, 1994 (suppl.):1–13.
12. Cuvier, G., 1817. [1816] - Le règne animal distribué d'après son organisation, pour servir de base à l'histoire naturelle des animaux et d'introduction à l'anatomie comparée, Paris:Deterville.
13. Delle Cave, L., Insom, E., and Simonetta, A. M., 1998. Advances, diversions possible relapses and additional problems in understanding the early evolution of the Articulata. Ital. J. Zool., 65:19–38.
14. DeRobertis, E. M., 1997. The ancestry of segmentation. Nature, 387:25–26.
15. Eernisse, D. J., Albert, J. S., and Anderson, F. E., 1992. Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa:a phylogenetic analysis of spiralian Metazoan phylogeny. Syst. Biol., 41:305–330.
16. Enghoff, H., The ground-plan of chilognathan millipedes (external morphology). Proceedings of the 7th international Congress of Myriapodology. Edited by:Minelli, A., pp. 1–21. Leiden:Brill.
17. Fauchald, K., and Rouse, G. V., 1997. Polychaete systematics:past and present. Zool. Scr., 26:71–138.
18. Fauvel, P., 1923. Polychètes errantes (Faune de France, vol. 5, Paris:Libriaire de la Faculté des Sciences.
19. Fedonkin, M. A., 1998. Metameric features in the Vendian metazoans. Ital. J. Zool., 65:11–17.
20. Field, K. G., Olsen, G. J., Lane, D. J., Giovannoni, S. J., Ghiselin, M. T., Raff, E. C., Pace, N. R., and Raff, R. A., 1988. Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science, 239:748–753.
21. Fortey, R. T., and Thomas, R. H., eds. 1997. Arthropod relationships, London:Chapman & Hall.
22. Giangrande, A., and Gambi, M. C., 1998. Metamerism and life-style within polychaetes:morpho-functional aspects and evolutionary implications. Ital. J. Zool., 65:39–50.
23. Held, L. I., jr. 1995. Axes, boundaries and coordinates:the ABCs of fly leg development. BioEssays, 17:721–732.
24. Holland, L. Z., Kene, M., Williams, N. A., and Holland, N. D., 1997. Sequence and embryonic pattern expression of the amphioxus engrailed gene (AmphiEn):the metameric pattern of transcription resembles that of its segment-polarity homolog in Drosophila. Development, 124:1723–1732.
25. Kimmel, C. B., 1996. Was Urbilateria segmented?. Trends in Genetics, 12:329–331.
26. Lake, J. A., 1990. Origin of the Metazoa. Proc. natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:763–766.
27. Minelli, A., 1996. Segments, body regions, and the control of development through time. In. M. T. Ghiselin & G. Pinna New perspectives on the history of life:Essays on systematic biology as historical narrative. Mem. California Acad. Sci, 20:55–61.
28. Minelli, A., and Bortoletto, S., 1988. Myriapod metamerism and arthropod segmentation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 33:323–343.
29. Müller, M., Weizsäcker, E., and Campos-Ortega, J. A., 1966. Expressin domains of a zebrafish homologue of the Drosophila pair-rule gene hairy correspond to primordia of alternating somites. Development, 122:2071–2078.
30. Nielsen, C., 1995. Animal evolution:interrelationships of the living phyla, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
31. Omodeo, P., 1998. History of Clitellata. Ital. J. Zool., 65:51–73.
32. Raff, R. A., 1996. The shape of life:Genes, development, and the evolution of animal form, Chicago - London:The University of Chicago Press.
33. Rota, E., 1998. Morphology and adaptations of Parergodrilus Reisinger and Hrabiella Pizl & Chalupski, two enigmatic soli-dwelling annelids. Ital. J. Zool., 65:75–84.
34. Rouse, G., and Fauchald, K., 1997. Cladistics and polychaetes. Zool. Scr., 26:139–204.
35. Saunders, P. T., and Mae-Wan, Ho. 1984. “ The complexity of organisms ”. In Evolutionary theory:paths into the future, Edited by:Pollard, J. W., 121–139. Chichester-New York-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapore:John Wiley & Sons.
36. Storch, V., 1968. Zur vergleichenden Anatomie der segmentalen Muskelsysteme und zur Verwandtschaft der Polychaeten-Familien. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 63:251–342.
37. Valentine, J. W., 1994. Late Precambrian bilaterians:Grades and clades. Proc. natl. Acd. Sci. USA, 92:6751–6757.
38. Valentine, J. W., 1995. “ Late Precambrian bilaterians:grades and clades ”. In Tempo and mode in evolution:genetics and paleontology 50 years after Simpson, Edited by:Fitch, W. M., and Ayala, F. J., 87–107. Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press.
39. Verhoeff, K. W., 1928. Durch Zucht erhaltene Formen des Polydesmus complanatus, illyricus Verh. und ihre Bedeutung, sowie Beurteilung des Elongation (1110. Diplopoden-Aufsatz). Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 12:684–705.
40. Verhoeff, K. W., 1928–32. “ Klasse Diplopoda ”. In Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-reichs, 3(2), Edited by:Bronn's, H.G., Dr. Leipzig:Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
41. Westheide, W., 1987. Progenesiss as a principle in meiofauna evolution. J. nat. Hist., 21:843–854.