Surveying victims: Options for conducting the National Crime Victimization Survey

Surveying Victims: Options for Conducting the National Crime Victimization Survey

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-218

  Groves, Robert M ^a,b   Cork, Daniel L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c Bureau of Justice Statistics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85024111780     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/12090     Document Type: Book

References (202)

1. Addington, L. A. (2005). Disentangling the effects of bounding and mobility on reports of criminal victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 21(3), 321-343.
2. Addington, L. A. (2007). Using NIBRS to study methodological sources of divergence between the UCR and NCVS. See Lynch and Addington (2007), Chapter 8.
3. Alaska Justice Statistical Analysis Center (2002, February). Measuring Adult Victimization in Alaska: Technical Report. Report for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. JC 20 \ 0109.011. Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage.
4. Anderson, D. A. (1999). The aggregate burden of crime. Journal of Law and Economics 42(611).
5. Atrostic, B., N. Bates, G. Burt, and A. Silberstein (2001). Nonresponse in U.S. government household surveys: Consistentmeasures, recent trends, and new insights. Journal of Official Statistics 17(2), 209-226.
6. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006, April). Crime and Safety, Australia-2005. Release 4509.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
7. Bachman, R., H. Dillaway, and M. S. Lachs (1998). Violence against the elderly: A comparative analysis of robbery and assault across age and gender groups. Research on Aging 20(2), 183-198.
8. Bachman, R., L. E. Saltzman, M. P. Thompson, and D. C. Carmody (2002). Disentangling the effects of selfprotective behaviors on the risk of injury in assaults against women. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18(2), 135-157.
9. Bachman, R. and B. M. Taylor (1994). The measurement of family violence and rape by the redesignedNational Crime Victimization Survey. Justice Quarterly 11, 499-512.
10. Bates, N. (2006, December 29). Noninterview rates for selected major demographic household surveys, 1990-2005. Internal memorandum, Demographic Surveys Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
11. Baum, K. (2007, November). National Crime Victimization Survey: Identity Theft, 2005. NCJ 219411.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
12. Baum, K. and P. Klaus (2005, January). National Crime Victimization Survey: Violent Victimization of College Students, 1995-2002. NCJ 206836. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
13. Baumer, E. P. (2002). Neighborhood disadvantage and police notification by victims of violence. Criminology 40(3), 579-616.
14. Baumer, E. P., J. Horney, R. B. Felson, and J. L. Lauritsen (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage and the nature of violence. Criminology 41(1), 39-71.
15. Belli, R. F. (1998). The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory 6(4), 383-406.
16. Belli, R. F., W. L. Shay, and F. P. Stafford (2001). Event history calendars and question list surveys: A direct comparison of interviewing methods. Public Opinion Quarterly 65, 45-74.
17. Belli, R. F., L. M. Smith, P. M. Andreski, and S. Agrawal (2007). Methodological comparisons between CATI event history calendar and standardized conventional questionnaire instruments. Public Opinion Quarterly 71(4), 603-622.
18. Bensley, L., M. S., J. Van Eenwyk, K. Wynkoop Simmons, and D. Ruggles (2000, July 7). Prevalence of intimate partner violence and injuries-Washington, 1998. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 49(26), 589-592.
19. Biderman, A. D. and D. Cantor (1984). A longitudinal analysis of bounding respondent conditioning and mobility as sources of panel bias in the National Crime Survey. In Proceedings of the Survey Methods Research Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
20. Biderman, A. D., D. Cantor, J. P. Lynch, and E. Martin (1986). Final Report of Research and Development for the Redesign of the National Crime Survey. Prepared for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc.
21. Biderman, A. D., D. Cantor, and A. Reiss (1985). A quasiexperimental analysis of personal victimization by household respondents in the NCS. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Statistical Association, Philadelphia.
22. Biderman, A. D. and A. J. Reiss (1967, November). On exploring the "dark figure" of crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 374, 1-15.
23. Bijleveld, C. C. and P. R. Smit (2004, September). Netherlands. See Farrington et al. (2004), Chapter 6, pp. 151-186.
24. Bradburn, N. M., J. Huttenlocher, L. Hedges, N. Schwartz, and S. Sudman (1994). Telescoping and temporal memory. In N. Schwartz and S. Sudman (Eds.), Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports. New York: SpringerVerlag.
25. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1989). Redesign of the National Crime Survey. NCJ 111457.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
26. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2000,May). Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1995: A National Crime Victimization Survey Report. NCJ 171129. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
27. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2006a, December). Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005-Statistical Tables. NCJ 215244.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
28. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2006b). National Crime Victimization Survey Longitudinal File, 1995-1999. Computer file. Conducted by U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. ICPSR 04414. Ann Arbor,MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
29. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2006c). State Justice Statistics Fiscal Year 2006 Program Announcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
30. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2007a). National Crime Victimization Survey, 2005. Computer file. Conducted by U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. ICPSR 04451. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
31. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2007b, January 15). National Crime Victimization Survey: MSA Data, 1979-2004. Computer file. Conducted by U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. ICPSR 04576. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
32. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2007, February 16). 2005 Consumer Expenditure Diary Survey, Public Use Microdata Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Division of Consumer Expenditure Surveys.
33. Bushery, J. M. (1981a). Recall biases for different reference periods in the National Crime Survey. In Proceedings of the Survey Methods Research Section, pp. 238- 243. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
34. Bushery, J. M. (1981b, March 31). Results of the NCS Reference Period Research Experiment. Memorandum for the NCS Reference Committee.Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
35. Cantor, D. and J. P. Lynch (2000). Selfreport surveys as measures of crime and criminal victimization. In Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, Volume 4 of Criminal Justice 2000, pp. 85-138. NCJ 182411.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
36. Cantor, D. and J. P. Lynch (2005). Exploring the effects of changes in design on the analytical uses of the NCVS data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 21(3), 293-319.
37. Carcase, C. (2004, September). Australia. See Farrington et al. (2004), Chapter 4, pp. 75-118.
38. Catalano, S. M. (2006, September). National Crime Victimization Survey: Criminal Victmization, 2005. NCJ 214644.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
39. Catalano, S. M. (2007). Methodological change in the NCVS and the effect on convergence. See Lynch and Addington (2007), Chapter 5.
40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003). Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing environment: Recommendations from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 52(RR9), 1-12.
41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005, September 2). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire. Behavioral Surveillance Branch. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
42. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006a). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Operational and User's Guide. Version 3.0. Behavioral Surveillance Branch. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
43. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006b, January 23). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire. Behavioral Surveillance Branch. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
44. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007, February 14). 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data Quality Report Handbook. Version 1.0.0. Behavioral Surveillance Branch. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
45. Central Statistics Office (2007, April 25). Crime and Victimisation: Quarterly National Household Survey, 2006 (including results for 1996 and 2003). Ref 75/2007. Dublin: Central Statistics Office.
46. Clements,W. andM. Bellas (2003). Criminal Victimization in Vermont, 2001. Montpelier, VT: Vermont Center for Justice Research. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
47. Cohen, M. A. (1988). Pain suffering and jury awards: A study of the cost of crime to victims. Law and Society Review 22, 538-555.
48. Cohen,M. A. (2000).Measuring the costs and benefits of crime and justice. Criminal Justice 4, 264-315.
49. Cohen, M. A. (2005). The Costs of Crime and Justice. London and New York: Routledge.
50. Conaway, M. and S. Lohr (1994). A longitudinal analysis of factors associated with the reporting of violent crime to the police. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 10, 23-39.
51. Cook, P. J. (1985). The case of the missing victims: Gunshot woundings in the National Crime Survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1(1), 91-102.
52. Cowan, C. D., L. R. Murphy, and J. Wiener (1984). Effects of supplemental questions on victimization estimates. See Lehnen and Skogan (1984), pp. 69-73.
53. Curtin, R., S. Presser, and E. Singer (2000). The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opinion Quarterly 64(4), 413-428.
54. Czaja, R., J. Blair, B. Bickart, and E. Eastman (1994). Respondent strategies for recall of crime victimization incidents. Journal of Official Statistics 10(257-276).
55. de Leeuw, E. and W. de Heer (2002). Trends in household survey nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison. In R. Groves, D. Dillman, J. Eltinge, and R. Little (Eds.), Survey Nonresponse, pp. 41-54. New York: Wiley.
56. DeFrances, C. J. and S. K. Smith (1994, June). Crime and Neighborhoods. NCJ 147005.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
57. DeFrances, C. J. and S. K. Smith (1998, April). Perceptions of Neighborhood Crime, 1995. NCJ 165811.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
58. DeMaio, T. J. (1980). Refusals: Who, where, and why. Public Opinion Quarterly 44(2), 223-233.
59. Demographic Surveys Division, U.S. Census Bureau (2007a, April 13). Key Points of Interest Regarding the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Material provided to accompany comments to the Panel to Review the Programs of the Bureau of Justice Statistics.Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
60. Demographic Surveys Division, U.S. Census Bureau (2007b, January). Survey Abstracts. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
61. Dinkes, R., E. F. Cataldi, W. LinKelly, and T. D. Snyder (2007, December). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2007. NCES 2008021; NCJ 219553.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
62. Dugan, L. (1999). The effect of criminal victimization on a household's moving decision. Criminology 37(4), 903-930.
63. Dugan, L. and R. Apel (2003). An exploratory study of the violent victimization of women: Race/ethnicity and situational context. Criminology 41(3), 959-980.
64. Duhart, D. T. (2000, October). Urban, Suburban, and Rural Victimization, 1993- 98. NCJ 182031.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
65. Durose, M. R., C. W. Harlow, P. A. Langan, M. Motivans, R. R. Rantala, and E. L. Smith (2005, June). Family Violence Statistics: Including Statistics on Strangers and Acquaintances. NCJ 207846.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
66. Engel, R. S. (2005). Citizens' perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 42(4), 445-481.
67. Engel, R. S. and J. M. Calnon (2004). Examining the influence of drivers' characteristics during traffic stops with police: Results from a national survey. Justice Quarterly 21(1), 49-90.
68. Farrington, D. P., P. A. Langan, and M. Tonry (Eds.) (2004, September). CrossNational Studies in Crime and Justice. NCJ 200988. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
69. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2004). UCR: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
70. Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics (2007). America's Children: Key National Indicators of WellBeing, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
71. Folsom, R., B. Shah, and A. Vaish (1999). Substance abuse in states: A methodological report on model based estimates from the 1994-1996 national household surveys on drug abuse. In Proceedings of the Survey Methods Research Section, pp. 311-375. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
72. Gannon, M. (2006). Crime statistics in Canada, 2005. Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics 26(4), 1-23. Catalogue no. 85002XIE.
73. Giblin, M. (2003, July). Measuring Adult Criminal Victimization: Findings from the Anchorage Adult Criminal Victimization Survey. Report for the Alaska Justice Statistical Analysis Center to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. JC 0109.021. Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage.
74. Grant, C., K. Bolling, and M. Sexton (2007). 2005-6 British Crime Survey (England and Wales): Technical Report, Volume I. Prepared for Research, Development and Statistics-StrategicData Flows (Crime Reduction and Community Safety Group). London: Home Office, United Kingdom.
75. Gray, C. M. (Ed.) (1979). The Costs of Crime. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
76. Greenfeld, L. A. and M. A. Henneberg (2001). Victim and offender selfreports of alcohol involvement in crime. Alcohol Research and Health 25(1).
77. Greenfeld, L. A., P. A. Langan, and S. K. Smith (1997). Police Use of Force: Collection of National Data. NCJ 165040.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
78. Griffin, D. H., J. K. Broadwater, T. F. Leslie, P. D. McGovern, and D. A. Raglin (2004, December). Meeting 21st Century Demographic Data Needs- Implementing the American Community Survey; Report 11: Testing Voluntary Methods-Additional Results. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
79. Griffin, D. H., D. A. Raglin, T. F. Leslie, P. D. McGovern, and J. K. Broadwater (2003, December). Meeting 21st Century Demographic Data Needs- Implementing the American Community Survey; Report 3: Testing the Use of Voluntary Methods. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
80. Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5), 646-675.
81. Groves, R. M. and M. P. Couper (1998). Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley.
82. Groves, R. M., D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, and R. J. Little (Eds.) (2002). Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley.
83. Groves, R. M., S. Presser, and S. Dipko (2004). The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly 68, 2-31.
84. Haddon, M. and J. Christenson (2005). Shedding Light: 2004 Utah Crime Victmization Survey. Salt Lake City: Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice, Research and Data Unit.
85. Harlow, C. W. (2005, November). National Crime Victimization Survey and Uniform Crime Reporting: Hate Crime Reported by Victims and Police. NCJ 209911. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
86. Hart, T. C. and C. M. Rennison (2003). Reporting Crime to the Police, 1992-2000. NCJ 195710.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
87. Hiselman, J., P. Stevenson, G. Ramker, D. Olson, and L. Levinson (2005). The Extent and Nature of Adult Crime Victimization in Illinois, 2002. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
88. Home Office (2007, February). Guidance on Statutory Performance Indicators for Policing, 2006/07, Version 4. Police and Crime Standards Directorate. London: Home Office, United Kingdom.
89. Hope, S. (2005). Scottish Crime and Victimisation Survey Calibration Exercise: A Comparison of Survey Methodologies. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
90. Hubble, D. L. (1999). NCVS: New questionnaire and procedures development and phasein methodology. In Proceedings of the Survey Methods Research Section, pp. 63-72. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
91. Iachan, R., J. Schulman, E. PowellGriner, D. E. Nelson, P. Mariolis, and C. Stanwyck (2001). Pooling state telephone survey health data for national estimates: The CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1995. In M. L. Cynamon and R. A. Kulka (Eds.), Conference on Health Survey Research Methods, Number 7th, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 011013. Hyattsville, MD, pp. 221-226. Conference on Health Survey Research Methods: National Center for Health Statistics.
92. Jansson, K. (2007). British Crime Survey-Measuring Crime for 25 Years. London: Home Office, United Kingdom.
93. Johnson, H. (2005). Crime Victimisation in Australia: Key Results of the 2004 International Crime Victimisation Survey. Number 64 in Research and Public Policy. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
94. Karmen, A. (2007). Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: ThomsonWadsworth.
95. Karr, A. F. and M. Last (2006, September 29). Survey Costs: Workshop Report and White Paper. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: National Institute of Statistical Sciences. Summarizes a workshop held April 18-19, 2006, at the National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.
96. Keeter, S., C. Miller, A. Kohut, R. M. Groves, and S. Presser (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 64(2), 125-148.
97. Killias,M., P. Lamon, andM. F. Aebi (2004, September). Switzerland. See Farrington et al. (2004), Chapter 9, pp. 239-302.
98. Kindermann, C., J. Lynch, and D. Cantor (1997). Effects of the Redesign on Victimization Estimates. NCJ 164381.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
99. Kish, L. (1976). Optima and proxima in linear sample designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 139, 80-95.
100. Klaus, P. (1999, March). Carjackings in the United States, 1992-96. NCJ 171145. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
101. Klaus, P. (2004, July). National Crime Victimization Survey: Carjacking, 1993-2002. NCJ 205123.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
102. Klaus, P. (2007, April). National Crime Victimization Survey: Crime and the Nation's Households, 2005. NCJ 217198.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
103. Klaus, P. and C.M. Rennison (2002, February). Age Patterns in Violent Victimization, 1976-2000. NCJ 190104.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
104. Klaus, P. A. (1994). The Costs of Crime to Victims: Crime Data Brief. NCJ 145865. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
105. Lauritsen, J. L. (2001). The social ecology of violent victimization: Individual and contextual effects in the NCVS. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 17(1), 3-32.
106. Lauritsen, J. L. (2005). Social and scientific influences on the measurement of criminal victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 21(3), 245-266.
107. Lauritsen, J. L. (2006a, August). Criminal victimization in American metropolitan areas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, Canada.
108. Lauritsen, J. L. (2006b, February 17). Evaluation of NCVS Methodology and Costs: Report for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Final Report for Visiting Research Fellowship, Grant (2005BJCXK025). Washington,DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
109. Lauritsen, J. L. and R. Schaum (2004). The social ecology of violence against women. Criminology 42(2), 323-358.
110. Lauritsen, J. L. and R. J. Schaum (2005). Crime and Victimization in the Three Largest Metropolitan Areas, 1980-98. NCJ 208075. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
111. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1981). Current objectives for the National Crime Survey program. See Lehnen and Skogan (1981), pp. 10. Excerpted from a memorandum from James Gregg, Acting Administrator, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, to Peter F. Flaherty, Deputy Attorney General, entered as testimony before the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, October 13, 1977.
112. Lee, M., D. Lewis, M. Crowley, E. Hock, C. Laskey, C. Loftin, W. Logan, and L. Addington (1999). Developing hate crime questions for the National Crime Victimization Survey. In Proceedings of the Survey Methods Research Section, pp. 1036-1041. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
113. Lehnen, R. G. and W. G. Skogan (Eds.) (1981). The National Crime Survey Working Papers: Volume I: Current and Historical Perspectives. Number NCJ 75374. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
114. Lehnen, R. G. and W. G. Skogan (Eds.) (1984). The National Crime Survey Working Papers: Volume II: Methodological Studies. Number NCJ 90307.Washington,DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
115. Lepkowski, J. P. and M. P. Couper (2002). Nonresponse in longitudinal household surveys. See Groves et al. (2002), Chapter 17, pp. 259-272.
116. Levitt, S. D. (1999). The changing relationship between income and crime victimization. Economic Policy Review 5(3), 993-1016.
117. Lewis, D. (2002, June). NCVS research. NCVS Research Unit, Demographic Surveys Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Memorandum 0202.
118. Lynch, J. P. (2002). Trends in Juvenile Violent Offending. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. NCJ 191052. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
119. Lynch, J. P. (2006). Problems and promise of victimization surveys for crossnational research. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 34. Accessed through LexisNexis; pagination differs from printed volume.
120. Lynch, J. P. and L. A. Addington (Eds.) (2007). Understanding Crime Statistics: Revisiting the Divergence of the NCVS and UCR. Cambridge Studies in Criminology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
121. Lynch, J. P., M. L. Berbaum, and M. Planty (1998). Investigating Repeated Victimization with the NCVS. Final report for National Institute of Justice Grant 97IJCX0027. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
122. Lynn, P. (1997). Collecting Data About NonRespondents to the British Crime Survey. London: Social and Community Planning Research.
123. Maltz, M. D. (1999, September). Bridging Gaps in Police Crime Data: A Discussion Paper fromthe BJS Fellows Program. Bureau of Justice Statistics and Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reporting Program. NCJ 176365. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
124. Maltz, M. D. (2007). Missing UCR data and divergence of the NCVS and UCR trends. See Lynch and Addington (2007), Chapter 10.
125. Martin, E., R. M. Groves, J. Matlin, and C. Miller (1986). Report on the Development of Alternative Screening Procedures for the National Crime Survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc.
126. May, D., J. Wells, K. Minor, K. Cobb, E. Angel, and K. Cline (2004). Crime Victimization Experiences, Fear of Crime, Perceptions of Risk, and Opinion of Criminal Justice Agents Among a Sample of Kentucky Residents. Center for Criminal Justice Education Research, Department of Correctional and Juvenile Justice Studies, College of Justice and Safety. Richmond, KY: Eastern Kentucky University.
127. McDowall, D. and C. Loftin (2007). What is convergence, and what do we know about it? See Lynch and Addington (2007), Chapter 4.
128. McManus, R. (2002). Criminal Victimization Trends in South Carolina. Blythewood, SC: Office of Justice Programs, South Carolina Department of Public Safety.
129. Miller, P. V. and R. M. Groves (1985). Matching survey responses to official records: An exploration of validity in victimization reporting. The Public Opinion Quarterly 49(3), 366-380.
130. Miller, T. R.,M. A. Cohen, and B.Wiersema (1996). Victim Costs and Consequences: A New Look. Research Report. NCJ 155282. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
131. Minnesota Justice Statistics Center (2003). Safe at Home: 2002 Minnesota Crime Survey. Minnesota Planning. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Justice Programs.
132. Murphy, L. (1976). The Effects of the Attitude Supplement on NCS City Sample Victimization Data. Unpublished internal document. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
133. Murphy, L. R. (1984). Effects of bounding on telescoping in the National Crime Survey. See Lehnen and Skogan (1984), pp. 83-89.
134. National Center for Victims of Crime (2003). Extending Our Reach, Reaching More: Victims of Crime, 2000-2002 Progress Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Victims of Crime.
135. National Research Council (1976a). Setting Statistical Priorities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
136. National Research Council (1976b). Surveying Crime. Panel for the Evaluation of Crime Surveys. Bettye K. Eidson Penick, editor, and Maurice E.B. Owens III, associate editor. Committee on National Statistics, Academy of Mathematical and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
137. National Research Council (1984). Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines. Report of the Advanced Research Seminar on Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology. Thomas B. Jabine, Miron L. Straf, Judith M. Tanur, and Roger Tourangeau (Eds.), Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
138. National Research Council (1997). SmallArea Estimates of SchoolAge Children in Poverty: Interim Report 1, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, Constance F. Citro, Michael L. Cohen, Graham Kalton, and Kirsten K. West (Eds.), Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
139. National Research Council (1998). SmallArea Estimates of SchoolAge Children in Poverty: InterimReport 2, Evaluation of Revised 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, Constance F. Citro, Michael L. Cohen, and Graham Kalton (Eds.), Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
140. National Research Council (1999). SmallArea Estimates of SchoolAge Children in Poverty: Interim Report 3. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, Constance F. Citro and Graham Kalton (Eds.), Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
141. National Research Council (2000a). SmallArea Estimates of SchoolAge Children in Poverty: Evaluation of Current Methodology. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, Constance F. Citro and Graham Kalton (Eds.), Committee on National Statistics.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
142. National Research Council (2000b). SmallArea Income and Poverty Estimates: Priorities for 2000 and Beyond. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, Constance F. Citro and Graham Kalton (Eds.), Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
143. National Research Council (2003a). Measurement Problems in Criminal Justice Research: Workshop Summary. Committee on Law and Justice and Committee on National Statistics, John V. Pepper and Carol V. Petrie (Eds.), Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
144. National Research Council (2003b). Survey Automation: Report and Workshop Proceedings. Oversight Committee for the Workshop on Survey Automation, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, Robert Groves, and William Kalsbeek (Eds.), Committee on National Statistics.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
145. National Research Council (2004). Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency (Third ed.). Committee on National Statistics.Margaret E. Martin,Miron L. Straf, and Constance F. Citro (Eds.), Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
146. National Research Council (2006). Once, Only Once, and in the Right Place: Residence Rules in the Decennial Census. Panel on Residence Rules in the Decennial Census. Daniel L. Cork and Paul R. Voss (Eds.), Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
147. National Research Council (2007). Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges. Panel on the Functionality and Usability of Data from the American Community Survey. Constance F. Citro and Graham Kalton (Eds.), Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
148. O'Brien, R. (1996). Police productivity and crime rates: 1973-1992. Criminology 34, 183-207.
149. Pepper, J. V. and C. V. Petrie (2003). Introduction. See National Research Council (2003a), Chapter 1, pp. 1-9.
150. Pfeffermann, D. (2002). Small area estimation-new developments and directions. International Statistical Review 70(1), 125-143.
151. Planty, M. (2007). Series victimization and divergence. See Lynch and Addington (2007), Chapter 6.
152. Planty, M. and K. Strom (2007). Understanding the role of repeat victims in the production of annual US victimization rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23(3), 179-200.
153. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967, February). The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Commonly known as the Crime Commission report.
154. Raghunathan, T. E., D. Zie, N. Schenker, V. L. Parsons, W. W. Davis, K. W. Dodd, and E. J. Feuer (2007). Combining information from two surveys to estimate countylevel prevalence rates of cancer risk factors and screening. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102(478), 474-486.
155. Rand, M. and S. Catalano (2007, December). Criminal Victimization, 2006. NCJ 219413.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
156. Rand, M. R. (1994, April). Guns and Crime: Handgun Victimization, Firearm SelfDefense, and Firearm Theft. NCJ 147003. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
157. Rand, M. R. and C. M. Rennison (2005). Bigger is not necessarily better: An analysis of violence against women estimates from the National Crime Victimization Survey and the National Violence AgainstWomen Survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 21(3), 267-291.
158. Rao, J. (2003). Small Area Estimation. New York: Wiley.
159. Rennison, C. M. (2003). Violent Crime and Victims Gender, 2002: An Examination of Differences in Correlates of Male and Female NonFatal Violent Victimization in the State of Illinois, 2002. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
160. Rennison, C. M. and M. R. Rand (2007). Introduction to the National Crime Victimization Survey. See Lynch and Addington (2007), Chapter 2.
161. Robinson, L. (2007, March 21). Statement. Prepared testimony for the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives.
162. Rosenfeld, R. (2007). Explaining the divergence between UCR and NCVS aggravated assault trends. See Lynch and Addington (2007), Chapter 9.
163. Rubin, M. (2007). Maine Crime Victimization Report: Informing Public Policy for Safer Communities. Edwin S. Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine. Portland,ME: Maine Statistical Analysis Center.
164. Savage, I. R. (1985). Hardsoft problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association 80, 1-7.
165. Singh, R. P. (1982, October 27). Investigation to determine the best reference period length for the National Crime Survey (NCS). Census Bureau memorandum, addressed to Gary M. Shapiro.
166. Sirken, M., T. Jabine, G. Willis, E. Martin, and C. Tucker (Eds.) (1999). A New Agenda for Interdisciplinary Survey Research Methods: Proceedings of the CASM II Seminar. Hyattsville,MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
167. Skogan, W. G. (1990). A review: The National Crime Survey redesign. The Public Opinion Quarterly 54(2), 256-272.
168. Smith, A. F. (2006). Crime Statistics: An Independent Review. Report of the Review Group. London: Home Office, United Kingdom.
169. Smith, M. D. (1987). Changes in the victimization of women: Is there a 'new female victim'? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 24(4), 291-301.
170. Smith, M. D. and E. S. Kuchta (1993). Trends in violent crime against women, 1973-1989. Social Science Quarterly 74(1), 28-45.
171. Smith, S. K., G. W. Steadman, T. D. Minton, and M. Townsend (1999,May). Criminal Victimization and Perceptions of Community Safety in 12 Cities, 1998. Bureau of Justice Statistics and Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. NCJ 173940.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
172. Spencer, B. D. (1982). Feasibility of benefitcost analysis of data programs. Evaluation Review 6, 649-672.
173. Statistics Commission (2006, September). Crime Statistics: User Perspectives. Report No. 30. London: Statistics Commission, United Kingdom.
174. Steffensmeier, D. andM. D. Harer (1999). Making sense of recent U.S. crime trends, 1980 to 1996/1998: Age composition effects and other explanations. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 36(3), 235-274.
175. Stohr,M. and S. Vazques (2001). Idaho Crime Victimization Survey, 2000. Meridian, ID: Idaho Statistical Analysis Center, Idaho State Police.
176. Sudman, S., N. M. Bradburn, and N. Schwarz (1996). Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
177. Teske, R. H. and N. L. Lowell (1977). Texas Crime Poll: Fall, 1977 Survey. Huntsville, Texas: Survey Research Program, Criminal Justice Center, Sam Houston State University. Manuscript is undated and assumed to be 1977. Available: http://www.cjcenter.org/cjcenter/research/srp/cparchive/1977.pdf.
178. Thacher, D. (2004). The rich get richer and the poor get robbed: Inequality in U.S. criminal victimization, 1974-2000. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 20(2), 89-116.
179. Thaler, R. (1978). A note on the value of crime control: Evidence from the property market. Journal of Urban Economics 5, 137-145.
180. Tourangeau, R. and M. E. McNeeley (2003). Measuring crime and crime victimization: Methodological issues. See National Research Council (2003a), Chapter 2, pp. 10-42.
181. Tourangeau, R. and T. Smith (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly 60, 275-304.
182. Turner, C., B. Forsyth, J. O'Reilly, P. Cooley, T. Smith, S. Rogers, and H. Miller (1998). Automated selfinterviewing and the survey measurement of sensitive behaviors. In M. Couper, R. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Clark, J.Martin,W. Nicholls II, and J. O'Reilly (Eds.), ComputerAssisted Survey Information Collection. New York: Wiley.
183. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1968). Report on National Needs for Criminal Justice Statistics, pp. 53. In Bureau of Justice Statistics (1989).
184. U.S. Census Bureau (2003). National Crime Victimization Survey: Interviewing Manual for Field Representatives. NCVS550. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
185. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000, November). Healthy People 2010 (2nd ed.). With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. 2 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
186. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2000). Statistical Programs of the United States Government: Fiscal Year 2001. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
187. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2006a, January). Questions and Answers When Designing Surveys for Information Collections. Washington, DC: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Office of Management and Budget.
188. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2006b, September). Standards and Guidelines for Statistical Surveys. Washington, DC: Statistical and Science Policy, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Office of Management and Budget.
189. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2006c). Statistical Programs of the United States Government: Fiscal Year 2007. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
190. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2007). Statistical Programs of the United States Government: Fiscal Year 2008. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
191. Walker, A. (2006, January 23). Victim survey methodology: Mode, sample design and other aspects-results from the inventory of victimisation surveys. Working Paper Number 6, submitted by the Home Office, United Kingdom, for the Joint United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Meeting on Crime Statistics, Vienna.
192. Walker, S. (1998). Popular Justice: A History of American Criminal Justice (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
193. Warchol, G. (1998, July). Workplace Violence, 1992-96. NCJ 168634.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
194. Wiersema, B. (1999). AreaIdentified National Crime Victimization Survey Data: A Resource Available Through the National Consortium on Violence Research. NCOVR Census Center Working Paper 1. Pittsburgh, PA: National Consortium on Violence Research.
195. Woltman, H. and J. Bushery (1984). Summary of a study examining "differentially weighted estimates of annual victimization rates using a 12month bounded reference period". See Lehnen and Skogan (1984), pp. 117-118.
196. Woltman, H., J. Bushery, and L. Carstensen (1984). Recall bias and telescoping in the National Crime Survey. See Lehnen and Skogan (1984), pp. 90-93.
197. Work, C. R. (1975). Objectives of the NCS and of victimization surveys. See National Research Council (1976b), pp. 219-228. Incorporated into memorandum to Charles Kindermann.
198. Wyoming Statistical Analysis Center (2004, Winter). Firstever Wyoming crime victimization survey. Field Notes from the SRC. Newsletter, Survey Research Center, University of Wyoming.
199. Ybarra, L. M. and S. L. Lohr (2002). Estimates of repeat victimization using the National Crime Victimization Survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18(1), 1-21.
200. Young, M., T. DuPontMorales, and J. Burns (1997). Volume I: Pennsylvania Crime Victimization Survey, Executive Report. The Center for Survey Research, Institute of State and Regional Affairs. Middletown, PA: Pennsylvania State University- Harrisburg.
201. Zawitz, M. W. (1995, July). Guns Used in Crime: Firearms, Crime, and Criminal Justice. NCJ 148201.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
202. Zimring, F. E. and G. Hawkins (1995). Incapacitation: Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime. New York: Oxford University Press.