Disentangling the effects of bounding and mobility on reports of criminal victimization

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 321-343

  Addington, Lynn A ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crime measurement; Panel design; Survey methodology; Telescoping

Indexed keywords

EID: 24044510818     PISSN: 07484518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10940-005-4274-5     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Addington, L. A. (2000), Examining the Use of Bounded Interviews in the National Crime Victimization Survey, Presentation at the Fifty-second Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, California.
2. Addington, L. A., Ruddy, S. A., Miller, A. K., and DeVoe, J. F. (2002). Are America's Schools Safe? Students Speak out 1999 School Crime Supplement Statistical Analysis Report, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
3. Bachman, R., and Taylor, B. M. (1994). The measurement of family violence and rape by the redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey. Just. Quar. 11: 499-512.
4. Biderman, A., and Cantor, D. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of bounding, respondent conditioning and mobility as sources of panel bias in the National Crime Survey. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section. American Statistical Association, Washington, DC.
5. Biderman, A., and Lynch, J. P. (1981). Recency bias in data on self-reported victimization. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Social Statistics Section. American Statistical Association, Washington, DC.
6. Biderman, A., and Lynch, J. P. (1991). Understanding Crime Incidence Statistics: Why the UCR Diverges from the NCS, Springer, New York.
7. Cantor, D., and Lynch, J. P. (2000). Self-report surveys as measures of crime and criminal victimization. In Duffee, D. (ed.), Criminal Justice 2000: Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington DC.
8. de Leeuw, E., and Collins, M. (1997). Data collection methods and survey quality: An over-view. In Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., de Leeuw, E., and Dippo, C. (eds.), Survey Measurement and Process Quality, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
9. Dugan, L. (1999). The effect of criminal victimization on a household's moving decision. Criminology 37: 903-930.
10. Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York.
11. Kindermann, C., Lynch, J. P., and Cantor, D. (1997). The Effects of the Redesign on Victimization Estimates: Data Brief, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
12. Lehnen, R. G., and Skogan, W. G. (1981). The National Crime Survey: Working Papers (Volumes 1 and 2), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
13. Lauritsen, J. L., Laub, J. H., and Sampson, R. J. (1992). Conventional and delinquent activities: Implications for the prevention of violent victimization among adolescents. Violence Vict. 7: 91-108.
14. Loftus, E., and Marburger, W. (1983). Since the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, has anyone beaten you up? Improving the accuracy of retrospective reports with landmark events. Memory Cognition 11: 114-120.
15. Lohr, S. L. (1999). Sampling: Design and Analysis, Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA.
16. Murphy, L., and Cowan, C. (1984). Effects of bounding on telescoping in the National Crime Survey. In Lehnen, R., and Skogan, W. (eds.), The National Crime Survey: Working Papers (Vol. II), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
17. Neter, J., and Waksberg, J. (1964). A study of response errors in expenditures data from household interviews. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 59: 17-55.
18. Planty, M. (2003). An examination of adolescent telescoping: Evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Fifty-eighth Annual Meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Researchers, Nashville, Tennessee.
19. Skogan, W. G. (1981). Issues in the Measurement of Victimization, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
20. Sudman, S., Finn, A., and Lannom, L. (1984). The use of bounded recall procedures in single interviews. Public Opinion Quart. 48: 520-524.
21. U.S. Census Bureau (2000). National Crime Victimization Survey: Interviewing Manual for Field representatives (Working draft), U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
22. U.S. Department of Justice. (1997). Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1994, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
23. U.S. Department of Justice (1998). National Crime Victimization Survey: School Crime Supplement 1995 (Codebook), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
24. U.S. Department of Justice (2001). National Crime Victimization Survey (Codebook), Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
25. Woltman, H., Bushery, J., and Carstensen, L. (1984). Recall bias and telescoping in the National Crime Survey. In Lehnen, R., and Skogan, W. (eds.), The National Crime Survey: Working papers (Vol. II), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.