An exploratory study of the violent victimization of women: Race/ethnicity and situational context

Criminology

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 959-980

  Dugan, Laura ^a   Apel, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Female violent victimization; National Crime Victimization Survey; Race and ethnicity; Risk factors; Situational context

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642365138     PISSN: 00111384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01010.x     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Abraham, Margaret 2000 Speaking the Unspeakable: Marital Violence among South Asian Immigrants in the United States. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
2. Bachman, Ronet and Bruce Taylor 1994 The measurement of family violence and rape by the redesigned national crime victimization survey. Justice Quarterly 11:701-714.
3. Biderman, Albert D. and David Cantor 1984 A Longitudinal Analysis of Bounding, Respondent Conditioning, and Mobility as Sources of Panel Bias in the National Crime Survey. Proceedings of the Section for Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association.
4. Block, Carolyn Rebecca 2000 The Chicago Women's Health Risk Study Risk of Serious Injury or Death in Intimate Violence a Collaborative Research Project. New Report. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
5. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001 National Crime Victimization Survey, 1992-1999 [Computer File and Documentation]. Conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 9th ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]. 1994- Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1993-1999. Washington, D.C.: 2000 Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. 1994 Technical Background on the Redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
6. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001 National Crime Victimization Survey, 1992-1999 [Computer File and Documentation]. Conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 9th ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]. 1994- Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1993-1999. Washington, D.C.: 2000 Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. 1994 Technical Background on the Redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
7. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001 National Crime Victimization Survey, 1992-1999 [Computer File and Documentation]. Conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 9th ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]. 1994- Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1993-1999. Washington, D.C.: 2000 Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. 1994 Technical Background on the Redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
8. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001 National Crime Victimization Survey, 1992-1999 [Computer File and Documentation]. Conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 9th ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]. 1994- Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1993-1999. Washington, D.C.: 2000 Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. 1994 Technical Background on the Redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
9. Craven, Diane 1997 Sex Differences in Violent Victimization. BJS Special Report Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
10. Crowell, Nancy A. and Ann W. Burgess 1996 Understanding Violence Against Women. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
11. Dugan, Laura, Daniel Nagin, and Richard Rosenfeld 2003 Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate partner homicide. Law & Society Review 27(1):169-198.
12. Greenfeld, Lawrence A. and Steven K. Smith 1999 American Indians and Crime. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
13. Greenfeld, Lawrence A., Michael R. Rand, Diane Craven, Cathy Mason, and James Alan Fox. 1998 Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
14. Hamby, Sherry L. 2000 The importance of community in a feminist analysis of domestic violence among American Indians. American Journal of Community Psychology 28:649-669.
15. Johnston, John 1984 Econometric Methods, 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Kruttschnitt, Candace 1994 Gender and interpersonal violence. In Albert J. Reiss, Jr. and Jeffrey A. Roth (eds.), Understanding and Preventing Violence. Vol. 3, Social Influences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
17. Lauritsen, Janet L. and Norman A. White 2001 Putting violence in its place: The influence of race, ethnicity, gender, and place on risk for violence. Criminology and Public Policy 1:37-59.
18. Marvell, Thomas B. and Carlisle E. Moody 1999 Female and male homicide victimization rates: Comparing trends and regressors. Criminology 37:879-900.
19. Meier, Robert F. and Terance D. Miethe 1993 Understanding theories of criminal victimization. In Michael Tonry (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Vol. 17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Miethe, Terance D., Mark C. Stafford, and J. Scott Long 1987 Social differentiation in criminal victimization: A test of routine activities/lifestyle theories. American Sociological Review 52:184-194.
21. Monette, Duane R., Thomas J. Sullivan, and Cornell R. DeJong 1994 Applied Social Research: Tools for the Human Services. Fort Worth, Tex.: Harcourt, Brace.
22. Perilla, Julia L. 1999 Domestic violence as a human rights issue: The case of immigrant Latinos. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 21:107-133.
23. Rennison, Callie Marie 2001 Violent Victimization and Race, 1993. BJS Special Report. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. 2000 Criminal Victimization 1999 Changes 1998-99 with Trends 1993-99. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
24. Rennison, Callie Marie 2001 Violent Victimization and Race, 1993. BJS Special Report. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. 2000 Criminal Victimization 1999 Changes 1998-99 with Trends 1993-99. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
25. Rivera, Jenny 1994 Domestic violence against Latinas by Latino males: An analysis of race, national origin, and gender differentials. Boston College Third World Law Journal 14:231-257.
26. Sampson, Robert J. and Janet L. Lauritsen 1994 Violent victimization and offending: Individual-, situational-, and community-level risk factors. In Albert J. Reiss, Jr. and Jeffrey A. Roth (eds.), Understanding and Preventing Violence. Vol. 3, Social Influences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
27. Sherman, Lawrence W. 1992 Policing Domestic Violence Experiments and Dilemmas. New York: Free Press.
28. Tjaden, Patricia and Nancy Thoennes 2000a Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women. Report from the National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice. 2000b Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence. Report from the National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
29. Tjaden, Patricia and Nancy Thoennes 2000a Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women. Report from the National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice. 2000b Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence. Report from the National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
30. U.S. Census Bureau 2000 National Crime Victimization Survey Interviewing Manual for Field Representatives. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau.
31. Yoshioka, Marianne R., Jennifer DiNoia, and Komala Ullah 2001 Attitudes toward marital violence an examination of four Asian communities. Violence Against Women 7:900-926.