Rewards for teaching

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 1997, Issue 72, 1997, Pages 41-52

  Knapper, Christopher ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023893263     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.7205     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Mathematical Society. Recognition and Rewards in the Mathematical Sciences. Report of the Joint Policy Board for Mathematics, Committee on Professional Recognition and Rewards. Washington, D.C.: American Mathematical Society, 1994.
2. Astin, A. W. What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
3. Boice, R. The New Faculty Member: Supporting and Fostering Professional Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
4. Boyer, E. L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, N.J.: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.
5. Cottrell, P. Professional Accreditation of University Teaching. London: Association of University Teachers, 1996.
6. Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. “Intrinsic Motivation to Teach: Possibilities and Obstacles in Our Colleges and Universities.” In J. Bess (ed.), Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 10. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.
7. Diamond, R. M., and Adams, B. E. (eds.). The Disciplines Speak: Rewarding the Scholarly, Professional, and Creative Work of Faculty. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education, 1995.
8. Edgerton, R. “The Re-Examination of Faculty Priorities.” Change, 1993, 25 (4), 10–17.
9. Elton, L., and Partington, P. Teaching Standards and Excellence in Higher Education: Developing a Culture for Quality. (2nd ed.) Sheffield, England: Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals, 1993.
10. Fairweather, J. S. “Academic Values and Faculty Rewards.” Review of Higher Education, 1993, 17, 43–68.
11. Gibbs, G. “Promoting Excellent Teaching Is Harder Than You’d Think: A Note from an Outside Observer of the Roles and Rewards Initiative.” Change, 1995, 27 (3), 16–20.
12. Hattie, J., and Marsh, H. W. “The Relationship Between Research and Teaching: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research, 1996, 66, 507–542.
13. Jailing, H., and Carlsson, M. An Attempt to Raise the Status of Undergraduate Teaching. Stockholm: Council for Studies of Higher Education, 1995.
14. Kember, D., and Gow, L. “Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning.” Journal of Higher Education, 1994, 65, 58–74.
15. Knapper, C. K. “Lifelong Learning and University Teaching.” In I. Moses (ed.), Higher Education in the Late Twentieth Century: A Festschrift for Ernest Roe. Kensington, New South Wales: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, 1990.
16. Knapper, C. K. “The Origins of Teaching Portfolios.” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1995, 6 (1), 45–56.
17. Knapper, C. K., and Rogers, P. Increasing the Emphasis on Teaching in Ontario Universities. Toronto: Ontario Council on University Affairs, 1994.
18. Knight, P. T. (ed.). The Audit and Assessment of Teaching Quality. Birmingham, England: Standing Conference on Educational Development, 1993.
19. Koriath, K. L., and Merrion, M. M. “Preparing the New Professoriate: The Doctor of Arts Revisited.” Review of Higher Education, 1992, 16, 63–84.
20. Massy, W. F., and Wilger, A. K. “It’s Time to Redefine Quality.” Paper presented at the fourth AAHE conference on Faculty Roles and Rewards, Atlanta, Jan. 1996.
21. McKeachie, W. J. “The Rewards of Teaching.” In J. Bess (ed.), Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 10. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.
22. Mullins, G. P., and Cannon, R. A. “A Teaching Portfolio for Departments.” Research and Development in Higher Education, 1991, 13, 378–383.
23. Nord, W. R. “Behavior Modification in a Loosely Coupled System: Thoughts About Motivating Teaching Performance.” In J. Bess (ed.), Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 10. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.
24. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
25. Perlman, B., Marxen, J. C., McFadden, S., and McCann, L. “Applicants for a Faculty Position Do Not Emphasize Teaching.” Teaching of Psychology, 1996, 23 (2), 103–104.
26. Ramsden, P., Margetson, D., Martin, E., and Clarke, S. Recognising and Rewarding Good Teaching in Australian Higher Education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1995.
27. Shulman, L. S. “The Pedagogical Colloquium: Three Models.” AAHE Bulletin, 1995, 47 (9), 6–8.
28. Smith, H., and Walvoord, B. “The ‘Certification’ Paradigm.” In M. D. Svinicki and R. J. Menges (eds.), Honoring Exemplary Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 65. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
29. Smith, S. L. Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Canadian Higher Education. Ottawa: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada, 1991.
30. Staff and Educational Development Association. The Accreditation of Teachers in Higher Education. Birmingham, England: Staff and Educational Development Association, 1994.
31. Stanford University. Towards Greater Excellence in Teaching at Stanford. Report of the Sub-Committee on the Evaluation and Improvement of Teaching. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, 1995.
32. Svinicki, M. D., and Menges, R. J. “Consistency Within Diversity: Guidelines for Programs to Honor Exemplary Teaching.” In M. D. Svinicki and R. J. Menges (eds.), Honoring Exemplary Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 65. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
33. Task Force on Resource Allocation. Undergraduate Teaching, Research and Consulting/Community Service: What Are the Functional Interactions? A Literature Survey. Toronto: Ontario Council on University Affairs, 1994.
34. Tierney, W. G., and Rhoads, R. A. Faculty Socialization as Cultural Process: A Mirror of Institutional Commitment. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report no. 93–6. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University, 1994.