Validating teaching and learning communities for teacher education reform

Teacher Educator

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 116-132

  Moore, Rita ^a   Seeger, Vicki ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA WESTERN   (United States)

^b Pleasant Hill Elementary School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023831312     PISSN: 08878730     EISSN: 19388101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08878730409555355     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abdal‐Haqq, I., 1998. Professional development schools:Weighing the evidence, Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
2. Berry, B., and Catoe, S., 1994. “ Creating professional development schools:Policy and practice in South Carolina's PDS initiatives ”. In Professional development schools, Edited by:Darling‐Hammond, L., New York:Teachers College Press.
3. Boreen, J., Johnson, M. K., Niday, D., and Potts, J., 2000. Mentoring beginning teachers:Guiding, reflecting, coaching, Portland, ME:Stenhouse.
4. Claus, J., 1999. You can't avoid the politics:Lessons for teacher education from a case study of teacher‐initiated tracking reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(1):5–16.
5. Darling‐Hammond, L., 1998. Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5):6–11.
6. Fleener, C., Teacher attrition:Do PDS programs make a difference?. Taper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators. Chicago, IL. February.
7. Houston, W. R., Hollis, L. Y., Clay, D., Ligons, C. M., and Roff, L., 1999. “ Effects of collaboration on urban teacher education programs and professional development schools ”. In Research on professional development schools. Teacher education yearbook VII, Edited by:Byrd, D., and McIntyre, J., 29–45. Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
8. Levine, M., 2002. Why invest in professional development schools?. Educational Leadership, 59(6):65–58.
9. Lincoln, Y., and Guba, E., 1985. Naturalistic inquiry, London, England:Sage.
10. Linn, D., 2000. Integrating professional development schools into state education reforms (Issue brief), Washington, DC:National Governors Association, Education Policy Studies Division.
11. McBee, R., and Moss, J., 2002. PDS partnerships come of age. Educational Leadership, 59(6):61–64.
12. Moore, R. A., 2004. Classroom research for teachers:A practical guide, Norfolk, MA:Gordon.
13. Moore, R. A., 2003. Reexamining the field experiences of preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1):31–42.
14. Patton, M. Q., 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, (2nd ed.), Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
15. Podsen, I., and Denmark, V., 2000. Coaching and mentoring first‐year and student teachers, Larchmont, NY:Eye on Education.
16. Proctor, T., 1999. Total scores for students on Texas Assessment of Academic Skills 1993–1999, Waco, TX:Baylor University.
17. Shantz, D., and Brown, M., 1999. Developing a positive relationship:The most significant role of the supervising teacher. Education, 119(4):693–694.
18. Shroyer, G., Wright, E., Kerr, E., and Weamer, D., Expertise in elementary math and science teaching:Evaluating an innovative pre‐service preparation model. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. St. Louis, MO. April.
19. Shroyer, G., and Yahnke, S., Professional development schools and student achievement:Do we make a difference?. Paper presented to the annual Kansas Coalition Conference. Olathe, KS. September.
20. Teitel, L., 2001. How professional development schools make a difference:A review of research, Washington, DC:National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.