Self-regulated dependency: Ethical reflections on interdependence and help in adapted physical activity

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 173-184

  Goodwin, Donna L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adapted physical activity; Disability; Help; Response to aid; Sport

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023656023     PISSN: 17511321     EISSN: 1751133X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17511320802223477     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ALBRECHT, G.L. and P.J. DEVLIEGER. 1999. The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science and Medicine 48: 977-88.
2. ARMSTRONG, D. 1995. The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness 17: 393-404.
3. ASCH, A. 1998. Distracted by disability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7: 77-88.
4. BALTES, M.M. 1996. The Many Faces of Dependency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. BARBEE, A.P. and M.R. CUNNINGHAM. 1995. An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships. Communication Yearbook 18: 381-413.
6. BEAUCHAMP, T. and J. CHILDRESS. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. BEDINI, L.A. 2000. ‘Just sit down so we can talk’: Perceived stigma and community recreation pursuits of people with disabilities. Therapeutic Recreation Journal 34: 55-68.
8. BRAITHWAITE, D. and N.J. ECKSTEIN. 2003. How people with disabilities communicatively manage assistance: Helping an instrumental social support. Journal of Communication Research 31: 1-26.
9. BRAITHWAITE, D.O. and N.J. ECKSTEIN. 2003. How people with disabilities communicatively manage assistance: Helping as instrumental social support. Journal of Applied Communication Research 31: 1-26.
10. BRICHER, G. 2000. Disabled people, health professionals and the social model of disability: Can there be a research relationship? Disability and Society 15: 781-93.
11. BROOKS, N.A. 1978. Receiving help: Management strategies of the handicapped. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 5: 91-9.
12. CACINOVIC VOGRINCIC, G. 2005. Teaching concepts of help in social work: The working relationship. European Journal of Social Work 8: 335-41.
13. CLAPTON, J. 2003. Tragedy and catastrophe: Contentious discourses of ethics and disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 47: 540-7.
14. CLEGG, J. 2004. Practice in focus: A hermeneutic approach to research ethics. British Journal of Learning Disability 32: 186-90.
15. CONDELUCI, A. 1991. Interdependence: The route to Community. Winter Park, FL: GR Press.
16. COREY, G., M. COREY and P. CALLANAN. 1998. Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions, 5th edn. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17. CUTRONA, C.E. and J.A. SUHR. 1992. Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research 19: 154-74.
18. GABEL, S. and S. PETERS. 2004. Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability. Disability and Society 19: 585-600.
19. GIGNAC, M.A.M. and C. COTT. 1998. A conceptual model of independence and dependence for adults with chronic physical illness and disability. Social Science and Medicine 47: 739-53.
20. GIGNAC, M.A.M., C. COTT and E.M. BADLEY. 2000. Adaptation to chronic illness and disability and its relationship to perceptions of independence and dependence. Journal of Gerontology 55B: 362-72.
21. GOFFMAN, E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press.
22. GOODWIN, D.L. 2001. The meaning of help in PE: Perceptions of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 18: 289-303.
23. GOODWIN, D.L. and R. THURMEIER. 2005. Negotiating independence against the landscape of Physical activity. Presentation at the International Federation of Adapted Physical Activity Symposium, Vienna, Austria.
24. GOODWIN, D.L., R. THURMEIER and P. GUSTAFSON. 2004. Reactions to the metaphors of disability: The mediating effects of physical activity. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 21: 379-98.
25. GUSTAFSON, P. and D.L. GOODWIN. Transition from rehabilitation to community wellness: What does it take? Paper presented at the Leaders in Rehabilitation Conference, Calgary, AB, Sept. 2006.
26. HAAS, J.F. and C.A. MACKENZIE. 1993. The role of ethics in rehabilitation medicine. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 72: 48-51.
27. HANFORD, L. 1993. Ethics and disability. British Journal of Nursing 2: 979-82.
28. HUGHES, W. and K. PETERSON. 1997. The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards sociology of impairment. Disability and Society 12: 325-40.
29. KELLY, J.E. 2006. Adapted Physical Education National Standards. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
30. KERR, N. and L. MEYERSON. 1987. Independence as a goal and a value of people with physical disabilities: Some caveats. Rehabilitation Psychology 3: 173-80.
31. KITCHENER, K.S. 2000. Foundation of Ethical Practice, Research, and Teaching in Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. KOCH, T. 2001. Disability and difference: Balancing social and physical constructions. Journal of Medical Ethics 27: 370-7.
33. KUCZEWSKI, M.G. and I. FIEDLER. 2001. Ethical issues in rehabilitation: Conceptualizing the next generation of challenges. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 80: 848-51.
34. KUCZEWSKI, M.G. and I. FIEDLER. 2005. Ethical issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation: Treatment decisions making with adult patients. Critical Review in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 17: 31-52.
35. LADIEU, G., E. HANFMANN and T. DEMBO. 1947. Studies in adjustment to visible injuries: Evaluation of help by the injured. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 42: 169-92.
36. LLEWELLYN, A. and K. HOGAN. 2000. The use and abuse of models of disability. Disability and Society 15: 157-65.
37. MASALA, C. and D.R. PETRETTO. 2007. From disablement to enablement: Conceptual models of disability in the 20th century. Disability and Rehabilitation 29: 1-12.
38. MULDERIJ, K.J. 1997. Peer relations and friendship in physically disabled children. Child: Care, Health and Development 23: 379-89.
39. NADLER, A. and J.D. FISHER. 1986. The role of threat to self-esteem and perceived control in recipient reaction to help: Theory development and empirical validation. In Advances in experimental social psychology, edited by L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press.
40. NADLER, A. 1987. Determinants of help seeking behaviour: The effects of helper’s similarity, task centrality and recipient’s self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology 17: 57-67.
41. NAGI, S.Z. 1965. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In Sociology and Rehabilitation, edited by M.B. Sussman. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
42. OLIVER, M. 1989. Disability and dependency: A creation of industrial societies? In Disability and Dependency, edited by L. Barton. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.
43. PETERS, D.J. 1996. Disablement observed, addressed, and experienced: Integrating subjective experience into disablement models. Disability and Rehabilitation 18: 593-603.
44. PETERSON, D.B. 2005. International classification of functioning, disability and health: An introduction for rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabilitation Psychology 50: 105-112.
45. PETERSON, D.B. and T.T. THREATS. 2005. Ethical and clinical implications of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in rehabilitation education. Rehabilitation Education 19: 129-37.
46. REID, G. 2000. Future directions of inquiry in adapted physical activity. Quest 52: 369-81.
47. REINDAL, S.M. 1999. Independence, dependence, interdependence: Some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disability and Society 14: 353-67.
48. RUMRILL, D. and J.L. BELLINI. 2000. Perspectives on scientific inquiry: Ethics in the conduct of rehabilitation research. Work 14: 67-74.
49. SHAKESPEARE, T. 1998. Choices and rights: Eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Disability and Society 13: 665-81.
50. SHOGAN, D. (1998). The social construction of disability: The impact of statistics and technology. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 15: 269-72.
51. SNYDER, S.L. and D.T. MITCHELL. 2001. Re-engaging the body: Disability studies and the resistance to embodiment. Public Culture 13: 367-89.
52. TALEPOROS, G. and M.P. MCCABE. 2002. Body metaphor and physical disability: Personal perspectives. Social Science and Medicine 54: 971-80.
53. TURNBULL, A.P. and R. TURNBULL. 1985. Developing independence. Journal of Adolescent Health Care 6: 108-19.
54. UEDA, S. and Y. OKAWA. 2003. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: What is it and what is it for? Disability and Rehabilitation 25: 596-601.
55. VERBRUGGE, L.M. and A.M. JETTE. 1994. The disablement process. Social Science and Medicine 38: 1-14.
56. WEGENER, S.T. 1996. The rehabilitation ethic and ethics. Rehabilitation Psychology 41: 5-17.
57. WHO (WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION). 1890. ICIDH: International Classification of Impairment, Disability and Handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
58. WHO (WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION). 1997. The International Classification of Impairments, Activities, and Participation: A Manual of Dimensions of Disablement and Functioning. Geneva: WHO.
59. WHO (WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION). 2001. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO.