Disablement observed, addressed, and experienced: Integrating subjective experience into disablement models

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 1996, Pages 593-603

  Peters, David Jesse ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Disablement models; ICIDH; Subjective experience

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; COMPREHENSION; DISABILITY; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; NOMENCLATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0030464929     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638289609166320     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Foucault M. The Birth of the Clinic: An archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage Books, 1975.
2. Cassell EJ. The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
3. Toombs SK. The meaning of illness: a phenomenological approach to the patient-physician relationship. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1987; 12: 219-240.
4. Baron RJ. An introduction to medical phenomenology: I can't hear you while I'm listening. Annals of Internal Medicine 1985; 103: 606-611.
5. Peters DJ. Human experience in disablement: the imperative of the ICIDH. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 135-144.
6. Nagi SZ. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman MB (ed) Sociology and Rehabilitation. Cleveland: American Sociological Association, 1965; 100-113.
7. Nagi SZ. An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly Health Society 1976; 54: 439-467.
8. Melvin JL, Nagi SZ. Factors in behavioral responses to impairments. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1970; 51: 552-557.
9. Wood PHN. Classification of Impairments and Handicaps. WHO/ICD9/REV.CONF/75.15. (World Health Organization, Geneva: International Conference for the Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases, 1975.)
10. Wood PHN, Badley EM. People with Disabilities: Toward Acquiring Information which Reflects more Sensitively their Problems and Needs. Washington, DC: World Rehabilitation Fund, Inc., 1980.
11. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva: WHO, 1980, 1993.
12. Badley EM. An introduction to the concepts and classifications of the international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Disability and Rehabilitation 1993; 15: 161-178.
13. Fougeyrollas, P, Paulet A, Tremblay G (eds). Entire Issue: The Handicap Creation Process: Analysis of the Consultation/New Full Proposals. ICIDH International Network 1991; 4: 3-37.
14. Guccione AA. Physical therapy diagnosis and the relationship between impairments and function. Physical Therapy 1991; 71: 499-503.
15. Minaire P. Disease, illness and health: theoretical models of the disablement process. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1992; 70: 373-379.
16. Pope AM, Tarlov AR (eds). Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
17. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Social Science and Medicine 1994; 38: 1-14.
18. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. Research Plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation and Research. Bethesda, MD, USA: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1993.
19. Fougeyrollas P. Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process: Quebec contributions relating to ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 145-153.
20. Johnson RJ, Wolinsky FD. The structure of health status among older adults: disease, disability, functional limitation, and perceived health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1993; 34: 105-121.
21. Fougeyrollas P, St-Michel G, Blouin M. Consultation: proposal for revision of the third level of the ICIDH: the handicap. ICIDH International Network 1989; 2: 8-32.
22. Whiteneck GG. Measuring what matters: key rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 1073-1076.
23. Ueda S. Implications of the Concepts of ICIDH and QOL for Medical Rehabilitation Outcomes Research (National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research and Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Bethesda, MD: An Agenda for Medical Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, 29-31 August, 1994.)
24. de Kleijn-de Vrankrijker MW (ed.) Special Issue: The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps (ICIDH): perspectives and developments (Part 1). Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 109-209.
25. Conrad P. Qualitative research on chronic illness: a commentary on method and conceptual development. Social Science and Medicine 1990; 30: 1257-1263.
26. Badley EM. The ICIDH: format, application in different settings, and distinction between disability and handicap. A critique of papers on the application of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. International Disability Studies 1987; 9: 122-125.
27. Badley EM. The genesis of handicap: definition, models of disablement, and role of external factors. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 53-62.
28. Wood PH. A man's reach should exceed his grasp. The 1988 Philip Nichols Memorial Lecture. International Disability Studies 1989; 11: 1-8.
29. Verbrugge LM. The Iceberg of Disability. In: Stahl SM (ed.) The Legacy of Longevity: Health and Health Care in Later Life. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990; 55-75.
30. Zaner RM. The Context of Self. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1981.
31. Williams RS Jr. Ability, dis-ability and rehabilitation: a phenomenological description. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1984; 9: 93-112.
32. Williams GH, Wood PH. Coming to terms with chronic illness: the negotiation of autonomy in rheumatoid arthritis. International Disability Studies 1988; 10: 128-133.
33. Finkelstein V. Planning services together with disabled people: the importance of a common language. World Health Statistics Quarterly 1989; 42: 177-179.
34. Weinberg N. Physically disabled people assess the quality of their lives. Rehabilitation Literature 1984; 45: 12-15.
35. Giorgi A (ed.). Phenomenology and Psychological Research. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1985.
36. Hycner RH. Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies 1985; 8: 279-303.
37. Toombs SK. The Meaning of Illness: A Phenomenological Account of the Different Perspectives of Physician and Patient. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.
38. Anderson TP. Educational frame of reference: an additional model for rehabilitation medicine. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1978; 59: 203-206.
39. Fuhrer MJ. Subjective well-being: implications for medical rehabilitation outcomes and models of disablement. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 73: 358-364.
40. Ader R, Felten DL, Cohen N (eds). Psychoneuroimmunology. San Diego: Academic Press, 1991.
41. Furberg CD, Schuttinga JA, cochairmen. Quality of Life Assessment: Practice, Problem, and Promise. Proceedings of a Workshop. (US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Washington, DC, USA: 15-17 October 1990.)
42. Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. Journal of the American Medical Association 1994; 272: 619-626.
43. Peters DJ. Qualitative inquiry: Expanding rehabilitation medicine's research repertoire. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 75: 144-148.
44. Brown S. A Sampling of Renegade Literature Sources About Disability. Institute on Disability Culture, 2260 Sunrise Point Rd, Las Cruces, NM 88011, USA, 1995.