Remodelling the regulation of postmodern innovation in medicine

International Journal of Law in Context

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 121-141

  Price, David ^a  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023072862     PISSN: 17445523     EISSN: 17445531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1744552305002028     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. AGICH, George (2001) ‘Ethics and innovation in medicine’ Journal of Medical Ethics 27: 295.
2. ANNAS, George (1987) ‘Death and the Magic Machine’ Western New England Law Review 9: 89.
3. ANNAS, George (1996) ‘Questing for Grails: Duplicity, Betrayal and Self-Deception in Postmodern Medical Research’ Contemporary Journal of Health Law and Policy 12: 297.
4. ARONOWITZ, Robert (1998) Making Sense of Illness: Science, Society and Disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. BEAUCHAMP, Tom and CHILDRESS, James (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5th edn.
6. BEH, Hazel and DIAMOND, Milton (2000) ‘An Emerging Ethical and Medical Dilemma: Should Physicians Perform Sex Assignment Surgery on Infants with Ambiguous Genitalia?’ Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 7: 1.
7. Belmont Report, (1978) National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
8. BRAZIER, Margaret (2003) Medicine, Patients and the Law. London: Penguin Books, 3rd edn.
9. CAPLAN. Arthur (1990) ‘Arguing with Success: Is In Vitro Fertilization Research or Therapy?’ in Dianne M. Bartells, Reinhard Priester, Dorothy E. Vawter and Arthur L. Caplan (eds.) Beyond Baby M: Ethical Issues in New Reproductive Techniques. Clifton, New Jersey: Humana Press, p. 149.
10. CAPRON, Alexander (1974) ‘Informed Consent in Catastrophic Disease Research and Treatment’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review 123: 340.
11. CAVE, Emma and HOLM, Soren (2002) ‘New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest’ Journal of Medical Ethics 28: 318.
12. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (2004) Standard Operating Procedures for Research Ethics Committees in the United Kingdom Version 2.
13. CHADWICK, Ruth (1994) ‘Corpses, Recycling and Therapeutic Purposes’ in Robert Lee and Derek Morgan (eds.) Death Rites. London: Routledge, p. 54.
14. CHURCHILL, Larry, COLLINS, Myra, KING, Nancy et al. (1998) ‘Genetic Research as Therapy: Implications of “Gene Therapy” for Informed Consent’ Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26: 38.
15. Department of Health (2002) Learning from Bristol: The Department of Health's Response to the Report of the Public Inquiry into children's heart surgery at the British Royal Infirmary 1984–1995, Cm. 5363,2002.
16. Department of Health (2001) Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment. London: Department of Health.
17. Department of Health (2003) Consent - procedures for which the benefits and risks are uncertain. London: NICE.
18. DOSSETOR, John (1990) ‘Innovative Treatment Versus Clinical Research: An Ethics Issue in Transplantation’ Transplantation Proceedings 22: 966.
19. EVANS, Donald and EVANS, Martyn (1996) A Decent Proposal: Ethical Review of Clinical Research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
20. FOX, Marie (2002) ‘Clinical Research and Patients: The Legal Perspective’ in John Tingle and Alan Cribb (eds.), Nursing Law and Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2nd edn, p. 252.
21. FREEMAN, Michael and LEWIS, Andrew (eds.) (2000) Law and Medicine: Current Legal Issues Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Garry (1998) ‘Towards evidence-based hysterectomy’ Gynaecological Endoscopy 7: 225.
23. GAZE, Beth and DAWSON, Karen (1989) ‘Distinguishing Medical Practice and Research: The Special Case of IVT’ Bioethics 3: 301.
24. GIESEN, Dieter (1995) ‘Civil Liability of Physicians for New Methods of Treatment and Experimentation: a Comparative Examination’ Medical Law Review 3: 22.
25. GILLON, Raanan (1991) ‘Research on the Vulnerable’ in Margaret Brazier and M. Lobjoit (eds.), Protecting the Vulnerable. London: Routledge, p. 52.
26. GOFFMAN, Irving (1961) Asylums. London: Penguin Books.
27. GRIMES, David (1993) ‘Technology Follies: The Uncritical Acceptance of Medical Innovation’ JAMA 269: 3030.
28. ILLICH, Ivan (1995) Limits to Medicine: medical nemesis - the expropriation of health. London: Marion Boyars.
29. INGELFINGER, F. (1972) ‘Informed (but Uneducated) Consent’ New England Journal of Medicine 287: 465.
30. Institute of Medical Ethics Working Party Report (1986) Medical Research with Children.
31. JOHNSTONE, Josephine and ELLIOTT, Carl (2002) ‘Healthy limb amputation: ethical and legal aspects’ Clinical Medicine 2: 431.
32. JONAS, Hans (1969) ‘Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects’ Daedalus 98:219.
33. KATZ, J (1987) ‘The Regulation of Human Experimentation in the United States - A Personal Odyssey’, A Review of Human Subjects Research 9, No. 1, p. 5.
34. KENNEDY, Ian and GRUBB, Andrew (1998) Principles of Medical Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. KENNEDY, Ian and GRUBB, Andrew (2000) Medical Law. London: Butterworths, 3rd edn.
36. KING, Nancy and HENDERSON, Gail (1991) ‘Treatments of Last Resort: Informed Consent and the Diffusion of New Technology’ Mercer Law Review 42: 1007.
37. KING, Nancy (1995) ‘Experimental Treatment: Oxymoron or Aspiration?’ Hastings Center Report (July-August), p. 6.
38. KING, Nancy (2000) ‘Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials’ Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28: 332.
39. KONG Wing May (2004) ‘The Regulation of Gene Therapy Research in Competent Adult Patients, Today and Tomorrow: Implications of EU Directive 2001/20/EC’ Medical Law Review 12:164.
40. Law Commission (1995) Consent in the Criminal Law, Consultation Paper No. 139, HMSO.
41. Law Reform Commission of Canada (1980) Medical Treatment and the Criminal Law, Working Paper 26, Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
42. LIBERATI, A. and VINEIS, P. (2004) ‘Introduction to the symposium: what evidence based medicine is and what it is not’ Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 120.
43. LIND, Stuart (1988) ‘Innovative Medical Therapies: Between Practice and Research’ Clinical Research 36: 546.
44. MCLEAN, Sheila (2000) ‘Gene Therapy - Cure or Challenge?’ in Michael Freeman and Andrew Lewis (eds.) Law and Medicine, Current Legal Issues Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 205.
45. MCNEILL, Paul (1993) The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. MARGO, Curtis (2001) ‘When is surgery research? Towards an operational definition of human research’ Journal of Medical Ethics 27: 40.
47. MASON, J. Kenyon, MCCALL SMITH, Alexander and LAURIE, Graeme (2002) Law and Medical Ethics. London: Butterworths, 6th edn.
48. Medical Research Council (1998) Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials, Appendix 1, Article 10.
49. MONTGOMERY, Jonathan (2003) Health Care Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn.
50. MORIN, Karine (1998) ‘The Standard of Disclosure in Human Subject Experimentation’ Journal of Legal Medicine 19: 157.
51. NOAH, Lars (2003) ‘Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the Pitfalls of Unregulated Biomedical Innovation’ Florida Law Review 55: 603.
52. Nuffield Council on Bioethics Working Party Report (1995) Human Tissue: Ethical and Legal Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
53. OBERMAN, Michelle and FRADER, Joel (2003) ‘Dying Children and Medical Research: Access to Clinical Trials as Benefit and Burden’ American Journal of Law and Medicine 29: 301.
54. PRICE, David (2000) Legal and Ethical Aspects of Organ Transplantation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Report of the Public Inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995: Learning from Bristol (2001) Cm 5207, The Stationery Office.
56. Royal College of Physicians (1996) Guidelines on the Practice of Ethics Committees in Medical Research involving Human Subjects. Royal College of Physicians of London, 3rd edn.
57. SCHNEIDERMAN, Lawrence and JECKER, Nancy (1996) ‘Is the Treatment Beneficial, Experimental or Futile?’ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5: 248.
58. STAUCH, Marc, WHEAT, Kay, and TINGLE, John (2002) Sourcebook on Medical Law. London: Cavendish Publishing, 2nd edn.
59. STIRRAT, George (2004) ‘Ethics and evidence based surgery’ Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 160.
60. TATTERSALL, M and SIMES, R (1992), ‘Issues in Informed Consent’ in C. Williams (ed.), Introducing New Treatments for Cancer: Practical, Ethical and Legal Problems. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, p. 79.
61. TUNKEL. Victor (1992) ‘Legal Aspects of Clinical Trials in the United Kingdom’ in C. J. Williams (ed.) Introducing New Treatments for Cancer: Practical, Ethical and Legal Problems. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, p. 9.
62. VINEIS, Paolo (2004) ‘Introduction to the symposium: what evidence based medicine is and what it is not’ Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 120.
63. World Medical Association, (2000) Declaration of Helsinki (1964, amended in Edinburgh, 2000 by the WMA 52nd General Assembly).