|
Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 248-256
|
Is the treatment beneficial, experimental, or futile?
a a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;
ADENOCARCINOMA;
ADULT;
ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE;
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT;
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION;
BREAST TUMOR;
CASE REPORT;
COST CONTROL;
ECONOMICS;
EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PATIENT RIGHT;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNCERTAINTY;
UNITED STATES;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
ADENOCARCINOMA;
ADULT;
ANTINEOPLASTIC COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOLS;
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES;
COST CONTROL;
DISCLOSURE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
MEDICAL FUTILITY;
PATIENT RIGHTS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TECHNOLOGY, HIGH-COST;
THERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
THERAPIES, INVESTIGATIONAL;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNCERTAINTY;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0030101635
PISSN: 09631801
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1017/s0963180100007003 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (19)
|