When is surgery research? Towards an operational definition of human research

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 40-43

  Margo, C E ^a  

^a Waston Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimental surgery; Innovative surgery; Medical ethics; Surgical research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT RIGHT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROTECTION; SURGERY; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INVESTIGATIONAL THERAPIES;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIALS; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT SELECTION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; THERAPIES, INVESTIGATIONAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035131146     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.1.40     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Keeping research subjects out of harm's way
2. Experimenting with humans. Part 2: Innovation or exploitation?
3. Innovative treatment versus clinical research: An ethics issue in transplantation
4. Surgical research, experimentation and innovation
5. Qualms about innovative surgery
6. Drugs and operations. Some important differences
7. Numerators without denominators: There is no FDA for the surgeon
8. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research
9. Are randomized surgical trials appropriate for evaluating new operations?
10. Surgical innovation and its evaluation
11. Paying for innovations in surgery
12. Human subjects have it worse than guinea pigs
13. A cautionary tale of innovation in refractive surgery
14. Toward a statement of the principles underlying responsible conduct in biomedical research
15. Challenge to human subject protection in US medical research