Clarifying the landscape approach: A Letter to the Editor on “Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics”

Global Change Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2017, Pages 4453-4454

  Erbaugh, James ^a   Agrawal, Arun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; TROPIC CLIMATE;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND REMEDIATION; HUMANS; TROPICAL CLIMATE;

EID: 85021811047     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: 13652486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13788     Document Type: Letter

References (15)

1. Agrawal, A., & Benson, C. S. (2011). Common property theory and resource governance institutions: Strengthening explanations of multiple outcomes. Environmental Conservation, 38, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000925.
2. Bonn Challenge. (2016). The challenge. Accessed 15 March 2017. Retrieved from: http://www.bonnchallenge.org/content/challenge
3. Chazdon, R. L., Brancalion, P. H. S., Lamb, D., Laestadius, L., Calmon, M., & Kumar, C. (2015). A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conservation Letters, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12220.
4. Ferraro, P. J., & Hanauer, M. M. (2014). Advances in measuring the environmental and social impacts of environmental programs. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 495–517. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101813-013230.
5. Lamb, D. (2014). Large-scale forest restoration. London: Routledge.
6. Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621.
7. McCall, M. K. (2016). Beyond “Landscape” in REDD+: The Imperative for “Territory”. World Development, 85, 58–72.
8. Miranda, J. J., Corral, L., Blackman, A., Asner, G., & Lima, E. (2016). Effects of protected areas on forest cover change and local communities: Evidence from the Peruvian Amazon. World Development, 78, 288–307.
9. Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 21–64), 2nd Edn. Boulder: Westview Press.
10. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science (New York, N.Y.), 325, 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.
11. Reed, J., Deakin, L., & Sunderland, T. (2015). What are “Integrated Landscape Approaches” and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: A systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence, 4, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2382-4-2.
12. Reed, J., Van Vianen, J., Deakin, E. L., Barlow, J., & Sunderland, T. (2016). Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: Learning from the past to guide the future. Global Change Biology, 22, 2540–2554. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13284.
13. Regan, T. (1981). The nature and possibility of an envorinmental ethic. Environmental Ethics, 3, 19–34.
14. Sabogal, C., Besacier, C., & McGuire, D. (2015). Forest and landscape restoration: Concepts, approaches and challenges for implementation. Unasylva, 66, 3–10.
15. Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J. L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., … Buck, L. E. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 8349–8356. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210595110.