Shared visions, future challenges: A case study of three Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program locations

Ecology and Society

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Walpole, Emily H ^a   Toman, Eric ^a   Wilson, Robyn S ^a   Stidham, Melanie ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CFLRP; Collaboration; Ecological restoration; Forest management

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH PROGRAM; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; STAKEHOLDER; THINNING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 85021805877     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-09248-220235     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Antuma, J., B. Esch, B. Hall, E. Munn, and F. Sturges. 2014. Restoring forests and communities: lessons from the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program. The National Forest Foundation, Missoula, Montana, USA.
2. Barro, S. C., and A. D. Bright. 1998. Public views on ecological restoration: a snapshot from the Chicago area. Ecological Restoration 16(1):59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/er.16.1.59.
3. Bartlett, G. 2012. Developing collaboration and cooperation. Pages 81–88 in M. North, editor. Managing Sierra Nevada forests. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-237. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, California, USA.
4. Butler, W. H. 2013. Collaboration at arm’s length: navigating agency engagement in landscape-scale ecological restoration collaboratives. Journal of Forestry 111(6):395–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/jof.13-027.
5. Druschke, C. G., and K. C. Hychka. 2015. Manager perspectives on communication and public engagement in ecological restoration project success. Ecology and Society 20(1): 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-07451-200158.
6. DuPraw, M. E. 2014. Illuminating capacity-building strategies for landscape-scale collaborative forest management through constructivist grounded theory. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
7. Edwards, A., G. Elwyn, J. Covey, E. Matthews, and R. Pill. 2001. Presenting risk information a review of the effects of framing and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication 6(1):61–82. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730150501413.
8. Findley, A. J., M. S. Carroll, and K. A. Blatner. 2001. Social complexity and the management of small-diameter stands. Journal of Forestry 99(12):18–27.
9. Gobster, P. H., and R. B. Hull. 2000. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/er.19.4.225.
10. Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, USA.
11. Harris, J. A., R. J. Hobbs, E. Higgs, and J. Aronson. 2006. Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology 14(2):170–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00136.x
12. Hjerpe, E., J. Abrams, and D. R. Becker. 2009. Socioeconomic barriers and the role of biomass utilization in southwestern ponderosa pine restoration. Ecological Restoration 27(2):169–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/er.27.2.169.
13. Hjerpe, E. E., and Y. S. Kim. 2008. Economic impacts of southwestern national forest fuels reductions. Journal of Forestry 106(6):311–316.
14. Hobbs, R. J., and D. A. Norton. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4(2):93–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.1996.tb00112.x
15. Jordan, W. R. 1995. Restoration (the word). Ecological Restoration 13(2): 151–152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/er.13.2.151.
16. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 47: 263–291. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
17. Keele, D. M., R. W. Malmsheimer, D. W. Floyd, and J. E. Perez. 2006. Forest Service land management litigation 1989–2002. Journal of Forestry 104(4):196–202.
18. Koontz, T. M. and E. M. Johnson. 2004. One size does not fit all: matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sciences 37(2):185–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:olic.0000048532.94150.07.
19. Leach, W. D. 2006. Public involvement in USDA Forest Service policymaking: a literature review. Journal of Forestry 104(1):43–49.
20. Margerum, R. D. 2002. Collaborative planning building consensus and building a distinct model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21(3):237–253. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0202100302.
21. Margerum, R. D. 2008. A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management 41 (4):487–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9067-9.
22. Margerum, R. D. 2011. Beyond consensus: improving collaborative planning and management. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015813.001.0001.
23. Meine, C. D. 1995. The oldest task in human history. Pages 7–35 in R. L. Knight and S. F. Bates, editors. A new century of natural resource management. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
24. Melillo, J. M., T. C. Richmond, and G. W. Yohe. 2014. Climate change impacts in the United States: the Third National Climate Assessment. US Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C., USA.
25. Millar, C. I., N. L. Stephenson, and S. L. Stephens. 2007. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17(8):2145–2151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/06-1715.1.
26. Moote, M. A., and D. Becker. 2003. Exploring barriers to collaborative forestry: report from a workshop held at Hart Prairie, Flagstaff, Arizona, September 17–19, 2003.The Ecological Restoration Institute, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
27. Moote, A., and K. Lowe. 2008. What to expect from collaboration in natural resource management: a research synthesis for practitioners. The Ecological Restoration Institute, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
28. Morgan, M. G., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, and C. Atman, editors. 2002. Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814679.
29. Noss, R. F. 2001. Beyond Kyoto: forest management in a time of rapid climate change. Conservation Biology 15(3):578–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003578.x
30. Olsen, C. S., and B. A. Shindler. 2010. Trust, acceptance, and citizen-agency interactions after large fires: influences on planning processes. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19 (1):137–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/wf08168.
31. Rittel, H. W., and M. M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2):155–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01405730.
32. Rubin, H. J., and I. S. Rubin. 2005. Qualitative interviewing (second edition): the art of hearing data. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
33. Schuett, M. A., S. W. Selin, and D. Carr. S. 2001. Making it work: keys to successful collaboration in natural resource management. Environmental Management 27(4):587–593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002670010172.
34. Schultz, C. A., D. L. Coelho, and R. D. Beam. 2014. Design and governance of multiparty monitoring under the USDA Forest Service’s Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program. Journal of Forestry 112(2):198–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/jof.13-070.
35. Shindler, B. A., M. Brunson, and G. H. Stankey. 2002. Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis. General Technical Report -537. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/pnw-gtr-537.
36. Shindler, B., and L. A. Cramer. 1999. Shifting public values for forest management: making sense of wicked problems. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 14(1):28–34.
37. Society for Ecological Restoration. 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration, version 2. The Society for Ecological Restoration International Science and Policy Working Group, Washington, D.C., USA.
38. Spence, A., and N. Pidgeon. 2010. Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change 20(4):656–667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002.
39. Stern, M. J. and T. D. Baird. 2015. Trust ecology and the resilience of natural resource management institutions. Ecology and Society 20(2):14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-07248-200214.
40. Stern, M. J., and K. J. Coleman. 2015. The multidimensionality of trust: applications in collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 28(2):117–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.945062.
41. Thompson, J. R., S. L. Duncan, and K. N. Johnson. 2009. Is there potential for the historical range of variability to guide conservation given the social range of variability. Ecology and Society 20(1):18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-02482-140118.
42. Thompson, M. P., N. M. Vaillant, J. R. Haas, K. M. Gebert, and K. D. Stockmann. 2013. Quantifying the potential impacts of fuel treatments on wildfire suppression costs. Journal of Forestry 111 (1):49–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/jof.12-027.
43. Toman, E., B. Shindler, and M. Brunson. 2006. Fire and fuel management communication strategies: citizen evaluations of agency outreach programs. Society and Natural Resources 19:321–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920500519206.
44. United States Congress. 2009. Omnibus Land Management Act of 2009. Section IV. United States Congress, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/restoration/documents/cflrp/titleIV.pdf
45. United States Government Accountability Office (USGAO). 2008. Natural resource management: opportunities exist to enhance federal participation in collaborative efforts to reduce conflicts and improve natural resource conditions: GAO-08-262. USGAO, Washington, D.C., USA.
46. Vining, J., E. Tyler, and B. S. Kweon. 2000. Public values, opinions, and emotions in restoration controversies. Pages 143–162 in P. H. Gobster and R. B. Hull, editors. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
47. Wilson, R. S., T. J. Ascher, and E. Toman. 2012. The importance of framing for communicating risk and managing forest health. Journal of Forestry 110(6):337–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/jof.11-058.
48. Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
49. Yaffee, S. L. 1994. The wisdom of the spotted owl: policy lessons for a new century. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.