Design and governance of multiparty monitoring under the USDA Forest Service's Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 198-206

  Schultz, Courtney A ^a   Coelho, Dana L ^a   Beam, Ryan D ^a  

^a Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Collaboration; Forest planning; Monitoring; Restoration

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; DESIGN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LAND RECLAMATION; LEVEL MEASUREMENT; MONITORING; RESEARCH; RESTORATION;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; COLLABORATION; FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION; FOREST PLANNING; GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS; US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURES;

FORESTRY;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LEGISLATION; MONITORING; PLANNING PROCESS; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

CONSERVATION; DESIGN; FORESTRY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MONITORING; RESEARCH; RESTORATION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84897528501     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5849/jof.13-070     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BENSON, M.H. 2010. Adaptive management approaches by resource management agencies in the United States: Implications for energy development in the Interior West. J. Energy Nat. Resour. Law 28(1):87-118.
2. BIBER, E.S.T. 2011. The problem of environmental monitoring. Univ. Colorado Law Rev. 83(1):1-82.
3. BUTLER, W.H. 2013. Collaboration at arm's length: Navigating engagement in landscapescale ecological restoration collaboratives. J. For. 111(6):395-403.
4. CHARMAZ, K. 1991. Translating graduate qualitative methods into undergraduate teaching: Intensive interviewing as a case example. Teaching Sociol. 19(3):384-395.
5. CRESWELL, J.W. 2008. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 296 p.
6. DELUCA, T.H., G.H. APLET, B. WILMER, AND J. BURCHFIELD. 2010. The unknown trajectory of forest restoration: A call for ecosystem monitoring. J. For. 108(6):288-295.
7. DOREMUS, H. 2001. Adaptive management, the Endangered Species Act, and the institutional challenges of "new age" environmental protection. Washburn Law J. 41:50-89.
8. DOREMUS, H. 2008. Data gaps in natural resource management: Sniffing for leaks along the information pipeline. Indiana Law J. 83(2):407-463.
9. DOREMUS, H. 2011. Adaptive management as an information problem. North Carolina Law Rev. 89:1455-1498.
10. FERNANDEZ-GIMENEZ, M.E., H.L. BALLARD, AND V.E. STURTEVANT. 2008. Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: A study of five community-based forestry organizations in the Western USA. Ecol. Soc. 13(2):4.
11. FOLKE, C., T. HAHN, P. OLSSON, AND J. NORBERG. 2005. Adaptive governance of socialecological systems. Annu. Rev. Env. Res. 30: 441-473.
12. HOLLING, C.S. (ED.). 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 377 p.
13. LARSON, A.J., R.T. BELOTE, M.A. WILLIAMSON. AND G.H. APLET. 2013. Making monitoring count: Project design for active adaptive management. J. For. 111(5):348-356.
14. MOIR, W.H., AND W.M. BLOCK. 2001. Adaptive management on public lands in the United States: Commitment or rhetoric? Environ. Manage. 28(2):141-148.
15. NIE, M., AND C. SCHULTZ. 2012. Decision-making triggers in adaptive management. Conserv. Biol. 26(6):1137-1144.
16. RASBAND, J., J. SALZMAN, AND M. SQUILLACE. 2009. Natural resources law and policy, 2nd ed. Foundation Press, New York. 1396 p.
17. RINGOLD, P.L., J. ALEGRIA, R.L. CZAPLEWSKI, B.S. MULDER, T. TOLLE, AND K. BURNETT. 1996. Adaptive monitoring design for ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 6(3):745-747.
18. RUHL, J.B. 2008. Adaptive management for natural resources-inevitable, impossible, or both? P. 1-6 in Proc. of 54th Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Annual Institute. Snowmass, CO.
19. RUHL, J.B., AND R.L. FISCHMAN. 2010. Adaptive management in the courts. Minnesota Law Rev. 95(2):424-484.
20. SCHRADER-FRECHETTE, K., AND E.D. MCCOY. 1994. Applied ecology and the logic of case studies. Philos. Sci. 61(2):228-249.
21. SCHULTZ, C. 2008. Responding to scientific uncertainty in US forest policy. Environ. Sci. Policy 11(3):253-271.
22. SCHULTZ, C., T. JEDD, AND R. BEAM. 2012. The Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Act: A history and overview of the first projects. J. For. 110(7):381-391.
23. SCHULTZ, C., AND M. NIE. 2012. Decision-making triggers, adaptive management, and natural resources law and planning. Nat. Res. J. 52: 443-521.
24. SINGLETON, R.A. JR., AND B.C. STRAITS. 2009. Approaches to social research, 5th ed. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. 672 p.
25. STANKEY, G.H., B.T. BORMANN, C. RYAN, B. SHINDLER, V. STURTEVANT, R.N. CLARK, AND C. PHILPOT. 2003. Adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan: Rhetoric and reality. J. For. 101(1):40-46.
26. STEM, C., R. MARGOLUIS, N. SALAFSKY, AND M. BROWN. 2005. Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: A review of trends and approaches. Conserv. Biol. 19(2):295-309.
27. STRAUSS, A., AND J. CORBIN. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 272 p.
28. US SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. 2008. Collaborative ecological restoration. 110th Congress, 2d sess., S. Hrg. 110-453.
29. YIN, R.K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods, 4th ed. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA. 240 p.