Forest service land management litigation 1989-2002

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 196-202

  Keele, Denise M ^a   Malmsheimer, Robert W ^a   Floyd, Donald W ^a   Perez, Jerome E ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Federal court; Forest policy; Forest service litigation; Lawsuits; National forests

Indexed keywords

FOREST POLICY; FOREST SERVICE LITIGATION; LAND MANAGEMENT LITIGATION; LAWSUITS;

DECISION MAKING; LAND USE; MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; LAND MANAGEMENT; POLICY MAKING; STAKEHOLDER;

DECISION MAKING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; LAND USE; LITIGATION;

EID: 33746709269     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alden, A., and P. Ellefson. 1997. Natural resource and environmental litigation in the courts: A review of parties, statutes, and circuits involved. Staff Pap. Series 125, University of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources, St. Paul, MN. 56 p.
2. Baldwin, P. 1997. Federal land management: Appeals and litigation. Congressional Res. Serv. Rep. 97-274. 15 p.
3. Buccino, S., T. Dowling, D. Kendall, and E. Weiss 2001. Hostile environment: How activist judges threaten our air, water, and land. Unpublished report by Alliance for Justice, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and Community Rights Counsel, July. 46 p.
4. Carter, J., M. Leahy, and W. Snappe III. 2003. Cutting science, ecology, and transparency out of national forest management: How the Bush administration uses the judicial system to weaken environmental laws. Environ. Law Rep. 33:10959-10977.
5. Coggins, G., C. Wilkinson, and J. Leshy. 2001. Federal public land and resource law, 4th Ed. Foundation Press, New York. 1232 p.
6. Floyd, D. 2004. Managing insurmountable opportunities. J. For. 102(2):8-9.
7. Jones, E., and C. Taylor. 1995. Litigating agency change: The impact of the courts and administrative appeals process on the Forest Service. Policy Stud. J. 23(2):310-336.
8. Malmsheimer, R. 1999. Review of natural resource agencies' decisions by U.S. Courts of Appeals' judges: Objective jurists or political policy makers? PhD dissertation, Faculty of Forestry, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY. 332 p.
9. Malmsheimer, R., and D. Floyd. 2004. U.S. Courts of Appeals judges' review of federal natural resources agencies decisions. Soc. Nat. Resourc. 17:533-546.
10. Malmsheimer R., D. Keele, and D. Floyd. 2004. National forest litigation in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. J. For. 102(2):20-25.
11. Shapiro, M. 1995. The United States, Chap. 4. P. 43-66 in The global expansion of judicial power, Tate, C., and T. Vallinder (eds). New York University Press, New York.
12. Snape, W. III, and J.M. Carter II. 2003. Weakening NEPA: How the Bush administration uses the judicial system to weaken environmental protections. Environ. Law Rep. 33:10682-10693.
13. Tipple, T.J., and J.D. Wellmann. 1991. Herbert Kaufman's forest ranger thirty years later: From simplicity and homogeneity to complexity and diversity. Public Admin. Rev. 51(5):421-428.
14. Thomas, J.W., and A. Sienkiewicz. 2005. The relationship between science and democracy: Public land policies, regulation, and management. Public Land Resourc. Law Rev. 26:39-69.
15. USDA Forest Service. 2002. The process predicament: How statutory, regulatory, and administrative factors affect national forest management. Available online at www.fs.fed.us/publications.html; last accessed Apr. 15, 2005.
16. Wenner, L. 1982. The environmental decade in court. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. 224 p.
17. Wenner, L.S., AND L.F. Dutter. 1988. Contextual influences on court outcomes. West. Polit. Quart. 41:113-134.
18. Wenner, L.S., and C. Ostberg. 1994. Restraint in environmental cases by Reagan-Bush judicial appointees. Judicature 77:217-220.