The effects of mental practice combined with modified constraint-induced therapy on corticospinal excitability, movement quality, function, and activities of daily living in persons with stroke

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 40, Issue 20, 2018, Pages 2449-2457

  Kim, Hee ^a   Yoo, Eun Young ^b   Jung, Min Ye ^b   Kim, Jongbae ^b   Park, Ji Hyuk ^b   Kang, Dae Hyuk ^c  

^a Konyang University   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University Wonju   (South Korea)

^c Hanseo University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Corticospinal excitability; motor imagery; occupational performance; stratified randomization; stroke; task oriented training

Indexed keywords

AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STROKE REHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PSYCHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85020637155     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1337817     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Dahl A, Askim T, Stock R, et al. Short-and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:436–447.
2. Hakkennes S, Keating JL., Constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51:221–231.
3. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006;296:2095–2104.
4. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, et al. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:55–60.
5. de Groot MH, Phillips SJ, Eskes GA., Fatigue associated with stroke and other neurologic conditions: implications for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1714–1720.
6. Page SJ, Levine P, Hill V., Mental practice as a gateway to modified constraint-induced movement therapy: a promising combination to improve function. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61:321–327.
7. Peurala SH, Kantanen MP, Sjögren T, et al. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on activity and participation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26:209–223.
8. Braun S, Kleynen M, Schols J, et al. Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a framework. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:579–591.
9. Cha Y-J, Yoo E-Y, Jung M-Y, et al. Effects of mental practice with action observation training on occupational performance after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:1405–1413.
10. Lacourse MG, Orr EL, Cramer SC, et al. Brain activation during execution and motor imagery of novel and skilled sequential hand movements. Neuroimage. 2005;27:505–519.
11. Williams J, Pearce AJ, Loporto M, et al. The relationship between corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and motor imagery ability. Behav Brain Res. 2012;226:369–375.
12. Levy WJ, McCaffrey M, Hagichi S., Motor evoked potential as a predictor of recovery in chronic spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 1987;20:138–142.
13. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, et al. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain. 2007;130:170–180.
14. Cha Y-J, Yoo E-Y, Jung M-Y, et al. Effects of functional task training with mental practice in stroke: a meta analysis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;30:239–246.
15. Page SJ, Levine P, Khoury JC. Modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice: thinking through better motor outcomes. Stroke. 2009;40:551–554.
16. Ietswaart M, Johnston M, Dijkerman HC, et al. Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain. 2011;134:1373–1386.
17. Liu KP, Chan CC, Lee TM, et al. Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1403–1408.
18. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard A., Mental practice in chronic stroke results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Stroke. 2007;38:1293–1297.
19. Tatemichi T, Desmond D, Stern Y, et al. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1994;57:202–207.
20. Mulder T., Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2007;114:1265–1278.
21. Kwon YC, Park J-H., Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K). Part I: development of the test for the elderly. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1989;28:125–135.
22. Isaac A, Marks DF, Russell DG., An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ). Journal of Mental Imagery. 1986;10:23–30.
23. Brunnstrom S., Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther. 1966;46:357
24. Kang MJ, Yoon TS, Park CI, et al. Motor evoked potential in stroke. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 1993;17:26–35.
25. Kiers L, Fernando B, Tomkins D., Facilitatory effect of thinking about movement on magnetic motor-evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;105:262–268.
26. Kim Y-H, You SH, Ko M-H, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1471–1476.
27. Rice MS, Alaimo AJ, Cook JA., Movement dynamics and occupational embeddedness in a grasping and placing task. Occup Ther Int. 1999;6:298.
28. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann R, et al. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50:311
29. Van der Lee J, Beckerman H, Knol D, et al. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35:1410–1414.
30. Hammer AM, Lindmark B., Responsiveness and validity of the motor activity log in patients during the subacute phase after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:1184–1193.
31. Liepert J, Miltner W, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 1998;250:5–8.
32. Lacourse MG, Turner JA, Randolph-Orr E, et al. Cerebral and cerebellar sensorimotor plasticity following motor imagery-based mental practice of a sequential movement. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:505
33. Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron J-C., Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke. 2006;37:1941–1952.
34. Neuper C, Scherer R, Reiner M, et al. Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual–motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Cognitive Brain Res. 2005;25:668–677.
35. Sakamoto M, Muraoka T, Mizuguchi N, et al. Combining observation and imagery of an action enhances human corticospinal excitability. Neurosci Res. 2009;65:23–27.
36. Maeda F, Kleiner-Fisman G, Pascual-Leone A., Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: specificity of the effect and role of observer's orientation. J Neurophysiol. 2002;87:1329–1335.
37. Nijland R, Kwakkel G, Bakers J, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for the upper paretic limb in acute or sub-acute stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2011;6:425–433.
38. Shi YX, Tian JH, Yang KH, et al. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus traditional rehabilitation in patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:972–982.