Enhancing sustainable community developments: A multi-criteria evaluation model for energy efficient project selection

Energy Procedia

Volumn 5, Issue , 2011, Pages 135-144

  Hsueh, Sung Lin ^a   Yan, Min Ren ^b  

^a TUNG FANG DESIGN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Chinese Culture University (SCE)   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

AHP; Delphi method; Energy conservation; Fuzzy logic; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; COMPUTER CIRCUITS; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FUZZY LOGIC; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; URBAN GROWTH;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); DELPHI METHOD; LOW-CARBON COMMUNITIES; LOW-CARBON DEVELOPMENT; MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION MODELS; SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES; SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 79961123237     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.025     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ding GKC. Sustainable construction-the role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management 2008; 86: 451-464. (Pubitemid 350103052)
2. Lam TI, Chan HW, Poon CS, Chau CK, Chun KP. Factors affecting the implementation of green specifications in construction. Journal of Environmental Management 2010; 91: 654-661.
3. Cole RJ. Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions. Building Research and Information 1999; 27: 230- 246. (Pubitemid 129651732)
4. Holmes J, Hudson G. An evaluation of the objectives of the BREEAM scheme for offices: a local case study. Proceedings of Cutting Edge 2000, RICS Research Foundation, RICS, London, 2000.
5. Johnson S. Greener Buildings: Environmental Impact of Property. MacMillan, Basingstoke; 1993.
6. Cole RJ. Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Building Research and Information 1998; 26: 3-16.
7. Crawley D, Aho I. Building environmental assessment methods: application and development trends. Building Research and Information 1999; 27: 300-308. (Pubitemid 129651738)
8. Rees W. The built environment and the ecosphere: a global perspective. Building Research and Information 1999; 27: 206-220. (Pubitemid 129651730)
9. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2009.
10. Adler M, Ziglio E. Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1996.
11. Lee JW, Kim SH. Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system selection. Computers and Operation Research 2000; 27: 367-382. (Pubitemid 30144761)
12. T.L. Saaty. The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
13. Perng YH, Hsueh SL, Yan MR. Evaluation of housing construction strategies in China using fuzzy-logic system. International Journal of Strategic property management 2005; 9: 215-232.
14. Nishioka Y, Yanagisawa Y, Spengler JD. Saving energy versus saving materials. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2000; 4: 119- 135.
15. Taylor R. Green roofs turn cities upside down. ECOS 2008; 143: 18-21.
16. Kotey NA, Wright JL, Barnaby CS, Collins MR. Solar gain through windows with shading devices: simulation versus measurement. ASHRAE Transactions 2009; 115: 18-30.