Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities

Nature

Volumn 546, Issue 7656, 2017, Pages 56-64

  Levine, Jonathan M ^a   Bascompte, Jordi ^b   Adler, Peter B ^c   Allesina, Stefano ^d  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); COMPLEXITY; KNOWLEDGE; RESEARCH; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TROPHIC INTERACTION;

BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SHRUB; SPECIES COEXISTENCE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; THEORETICAL STUDY; TROPHIC CASCADE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOTA; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOTA; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 85020191160     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature22898     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Hutchinson, G. E. The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat. 95, 137-145 (1961).
2. Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343-366 (2000).
3. Barabás, G., Michalska-Smith, M. J. & Allesina, S. The effect of intra-And interspecific competition on coexistence in multispecies communities. Am. Nat. 188, E1-E12 (2016). This paper investigates how the specific arrangement of competition coefficients in a network structure affects stability.
4. Hubbell, S. P. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct. Ecol. 19, 166-172 (2005).
5. Kraft, N. J. B., Valencia, R. & Ackerly, D. D. Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science 322, 580-582 (2008).
6. Allesina, S. & Levine, J. M. A competitive network theory of species diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5638-5642 (2011). This paper uses mathematical theory to show how intransitive competitive loops emerge and stabilize coexistence in diverse competitive networks.
7. Billick, I. & Case, T. J. Higher order interactions in ecological communities: what are they and how can they be detected? Ecology 75, 1529-1543 (1994).
8. Friedman, J., Higgins, L. M. & Gore, J. Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms. Nature Ecol. Evol. 0109 (2017).
9. Thébault, E. & Fontaine, C. Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329, 853-856 (2010).
10. Stouffer, D. B. & Bascompte, J. Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3648-3652 (2011).
11. Montoya, J. M., Woodward, G., Emmerson, M. C. & Solé, R. V. Press perturbations and indirect effects in real food webs. Ecology 90, 2426-2433 (2009).
12. Solé, R. V. & Montoya, J. A. Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proc. R. Soc. B 268, 2039-2045 (2001).
13. Memmott, J., Waser, N. M. & Price, M. V. Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc. R. Soc. B 271, 2605-2611 (2004).
14. Rezende, E. L., Lavabre, J. E., Guimarães, P. R., Jr, Jordano, P. & Bascompte, J. Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks. Nature 448, 925-928 (2007).
15. Case, T. J. Invasion resistance, species build-up and community collapse in metapopulation models with interspecies competition. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42, 239-266 (1991).
16. Stone, L. & Roberts, A. Conditions for a species to gain advantage from the presence of competitors. Ecology 72, 1964-1972 (1991).
17. Kerr, B., Riley, M. A., Feldman, M. W. & Bohannan, B. J. M. Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock-paper-scissors. Nature 418, 171-174 (2002). This paper shows how a rock-paper-scissors competitive loop can stabilize the dynamics of multiple strains of E. coli in the laboratory.
18. Wootton, J. T. Indirect effects and habitat use in an intertidal community: interaction chains and interaction modifications. Am. Nat. 141, 71-89 (1993).
19. Padilla, F. M. et. al. Early root overproduction not triggered by nutrients decisive for competitive success belowground. PLoS ONE 8, e55805 (2013).
20. May, R. M. Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238, 413-414 (1972).
21. Yodzis, P. The indeterminancy of ecological interactions as perceived through perturbation experiments. Ecology 69, 508-515 (1988).
22. Allesina, S. & Tang, S. Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature 483, 205-208 (2012).
23. May, R. M. & Leonard, W. J. Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 29, 243-253 (1975).
24. Levine, S. H. Competitive interactions in ecosystems. Am. Nat. 110, 903-910 (1976).
25. Vandermeer, J. Indirect and diffuse interactions: complicated cycles in a population embedded in a large community. J. Theor. Biol. 142, 429-442 (1990).
26. Hofbauer, J. & Sigmund, K. Evolutionary game dynamics. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 40, 479-519 (2003).
27. Laird, R. A. & Schamp, B. S. Competitive intransitivity promotes species coexistence. Am. Nat. 168, 182-193 (2006).
28. Huisman, J. & Weissing, F. J. Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature 402, 407-410 (1999).
29. Benincá, E., Ballantine, B., Ellner, S. P. & Huisman, J. Species fluctuations sustained by a cyclic succession at the edge of chaos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6389-6394 (2015).
30. Edwards, K. & Schreiber, S. Preemption of space can lead to intransitive coexistence of competitors. Oikos 119, 1201-1209 (2010).
31. MacArthur, R. & Levins, R. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat. 101, 377-385 (1967).
32. Pimm, S. L. The structure of food webs. Theor. Popul. Biol. 16, 144-158 (1979).
33. Krause, A. E., Frank, K. A., Mason, D. M., Ulanowicz, R. E. & Taylor, W. W. Compartments revealed in food-web structure. Nature 426, 282-285 (2003).
34. Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L. & Jordano, P. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19891-19896 (2007).
35. Allesina, S. & Pascual, M. Food web models: a plea for groups. Ecol. Lett. 12, 652-662 (2009).
36. Guimerá, R. et. al. Origin of compartmentalization in food webs. Ecology 91, 2941-2951 (2010).
37. Grilli, J., Rogers, T. & Allesina, S. Modularity and stability in ecological communities. Nature Commun. 7, 12031 (2016).
38. Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J. & Olesen, J. M. The nested assembly of plant-Animal mutualistic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9383-9387 (2003).
39. Bastolla, U. et. al. The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature 458, 1018-1020 (2009).
40. Sinervo, B. & Lively, C. M. The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature 380, 240-243 (1996).
41. Lankau, R. A. & Strauss, S. Y. Mutual feedbacks maintain both genetic and species diversity in a plant community. Science 317, 1561-1563 (2007). This paper shows how genetic diversity in a species of mustard helps to stabilize between-species coexistence through an intransitive competitive relationship.
42. Lankau, R. A. Genetic variation promotes long-term coexistence of Brassica nigra and its competitors. Am. Nat. 174, E40-E53 (2009).
43. Buss, L. W. & Jackson, J. B. C. Competitive networks: nontransitive competitive relationships in cryptic coral reef environments. Am. Nat. 113, 223-234 (1979).
44. Buss, L. W. Competitive intransitivity and size-frequency distributions of interaction populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77, 5355-5359 (1980).
45. Paine, R. T. Ecological determinism in the competition for space: the Robert H. MacArthur Award lecture. Ecology 65, 1339-1348 (1984).
46. Keddy, P. A. & Shipley, B. Competitive hierarchies in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 54, 234-241 (1989).
47. Grace, J. B., Guntenspergen, G. R. & Keough, J. The examination of a competition matrix for transitivity and intransitive loops. Oikos 68, 91-98 (1993).
48. Shipley, B. A null model for competitive hierarchies in competition matrices. Ecology 74, 1693-1699 (1993).
49. Diez, H., Steinlein, T. & Ullmann, I. The role of growth form and correlated traits in competitive ranking of six perennial ruderal plant species grown in unbalanced mixtures. Acta Oecol. 19, 25-36 (1998).
50. Cameron, D. D., White, A. & Antonovics, J. Parasite-grass-forb interactions and rock-paper scissor dynamics: predicting the effects of the parasitic plant Rhinanthus minor on host plant communities. J. Ecol. 97, 1311-1319 (2009).
51. Zhang, S. & Lamb, E. G. Plant competitive ability and the transitivity of competitive hierarchies change with plant age. Plant Ecol. 231, 15-23 (2012).
52. Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, 1982).
53. Ulrich, W., Soliveres, S., Kryszewski, W., Maestre, F. T. & Gotelli, N. J. Matrix models for quantifying competitive intransitivity from species abundance data. Oikos 123, 1057-1070 (2014).
54. Soliveres, S. et. al. Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness. Ecol. Lett. 18, 790-798 (2015).
55. Abrams, P. A. Arguments in favor of higher-order interactions. Am. Nat. 121, 889-891 (1983).
56. Golubski, A. J., Westlund, E. E., Vandermeer, J. & Pascual, M. Ecological networks over the edge: hypergraph trait-mediated indirect interaction (TMII) structure. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 344-354 (2016).
57. Bairey, E., Kelsic, E. D. & Kishony, R. Higher-order species interactions shape ecosystem diversity. Nature Commun. 7, 12285 (2016). This paper uses mathematical models to show that higher-order interactions can cause communities with greater diversity to be more stable than their species-poor counterparts, contrary to classic theory that is based on pairwise interactions.
58. Vandermeer, J. H. A further note on community models. Am. Nat. 117, 379-380 (1981).
59. Mayfield, M. M. & Stouffer, D. B. Higher-order interactions capture unexplained complexity in diverse communities. Nature Ecol. Evol. 1, 0062 (2017).
60. Vandermeer, J. H. The competitive structure of communities: an experimental approach with protozoa. Ecology 50, 362-371 (1969).
61. Neill, W. E. The community matrix and interdependence of the competition coefficients. Am. Nat. 108, 399-408 (1974).
62. Worthen, W. B. & Moore, J. L. Higher-order interactions and indirect effects: a resolution using laboratory Drosophila communities. Am. Nat. 138, 1092-1104 (1991).
63. Morin, P. J., Lawler, S. P. & Johnson, E. A. Competition between aquatic insects and vertebrates: interaction strength and higher order interactions. Ecology 69, 1401-1409 (1988).
64. Pomerantz, M. J. Do 'higher order interactions' in competition systems really exist? Am. Nat. 117, 583-591 (1981).
65. Adler, F. R. & Morris, W. F. A general test for interaction modification. Ecology 75, 1552-1559 (1994).
66. Dormann, C. F. & Roxburgh, S. H. Experimental evidence rejects pairwise modelling approach to coexistence in plant communities. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1279-1285 (2005).
67. Weigelt, A. et. al. Identifying mechanisms of competition in multi-species communities. J. Ecol. 95, 53-64 (2007).
68. Vandermeer, J. H. A further note on community models. Am. Nat. 117, 379-380 (1981).
69. Huisman, J. & Weissing, F. J. Biological conditions for oscillations and chaos generated by multispecies competition. Ecology 82, 2682-2695 (2001).
70. Vasseur, D. A., Amarasekare, P., Rudolf, V. H. W. & Levine, J. M. Eco-evolutionary dynamics enable coexistence via neighbor-dependent selection. Am. Nat. 178, E96-E109 (2011).
71. Bastolla, U., Lässig, M., Manrubia, S. C. & Valleriani, A. Biodiversity in model ecosystems, I: coexistence conditions for competing species. J. Theor. Biol. 235, 521-530 (2005).
72. Jabot, F. & Bascompte, J. Bitrophic interactions shape biodiversity in space. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4521-4526 (2012).
73. Lasky, J. R., Uriarte, M., Boukili, V. K. & Chazdon, R. L. Trait-mediated assembly processes predict successional changes in community diversity of tropical forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5616-5621 (2014).
74. Kraft, N. J. B., Godoy, O. & Levine, J. M. Plant functional traits and the multidimensional nature of species coexistence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 797-802 (2015).
75. Chu, C. & Adler, P. B. Large niche differences emerge at the recruitment stage to stabilize grassland coexistence. Ecol. Monogr. 85, 373-392 (2015). This paper describes state-of-the-Art approaches for combining observational data with mathematical models to project the importance of particular coexistence mechanisms in nature.
76. Godoy, O., Stouffer, D. B., Kraft, N. J. & Levine, J. M. Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences. Ecology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1782 (2017).
77. Ellner, S. P., Snyder, R. E. & Adler, P. B. How to quantify the temporal storage effect using simulations instead of math. Ecol. Lett. 19, 1333-1342 (2016).
78. Antonopoulos, D. A. et. al. Reproducible community dynamics of the gastrointestinal microbiota following antibiotic perturbation. Infect. Immun. 77, 2367-2375 (2009).
79. Costello, C. et. al. Status and solutions for the world's unassessed fisheries. Science 338, 517-520 (2012).
80. Eklof, A. & Ebenman, B. Species loss and secondary extinctions in simple and complex model communities. J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 239-246 (2006).
81. Levine, J. M., Adler, P. B. & Yelenik, S. G. A meta-Analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 7, 975-989 (2004).
82. Silvertown, J., Dodd, M. E., Gowing, D. J. G. & Mountford, J. O. Hydrologically defined niches reveal a basis for species richness in plant communities. Nature 400, 61-63 (1999).
83. Adler, P. B., HilleRisLambers, J. & Levine, J. M. A niche for neutrality. Ecol. Lett. 10, 95-104 (2007).
84. Goh, B. S. Global stability in many-species systems. Am. Nat. 111, 135-143 (1977).
85. Roberts, A. The stability of a feasible random ecosystem. Nature 251, 608-609 (1974).
86. Vandermeer, J. H. Interspecific competition: a new approach to the classical theory. Science 188, 253-255 (1975).
87. Stone, L. Some Problems of Community Ecology: Processes, Patterns and Species Persistence in Ecosystems. PhD thesis, Monash Univ. (1988).
88. Logofet, D. O. Matrices and Graphs: Stability Problems in Mathematical Ecology (CRC, 1992).
89. Case, T. J. An Illustrated Guide to Theoretical Ecology (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).
90. Rohr, R. P., Saavedra, S. & Bascompte, J. On the structural stability of mutualistic systems. Science 345, 1253497 (2014).
91. Justus, J. Ecological and Lyapunov stability. Philos. Sci. 75, 421-436 (2008).
92. Thom, R. Structural Stability and Morphogenesis (Addison-Wesley, 1994).
93. Solé, R. V. & Valls, J. On structural stability and chaos in biological systems. J. Theor. Biol. 155, 87-102 (1992).
94. Saavedra, S. et. al. A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence. Ecol. Monogr. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1263 (2017).