De novo transcriptome assembly of sugarcane leaves submitted to prolonged water-deficit stress

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Belesini, A A ^a   Carvalho, F M S ^a   Telles, B R ^a   de Castro, G M ^b   Giachetto, P F ^b   Vantini, J S ^a   Carlin, S D ^c   Cazetta, J O ^a   Pinheiro, D G ^a   Ferro, M I T ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA INFORMÁTICA AGROPECUÁRIA   (Brazil)

^c Centro Avançado da Pesquisa Tecnológica do Agronegócio de Cana   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Drought; Gene expression; RNA seq; Saccharum spp.

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTIVAR; DROUGHT STRESS; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE NUMBER; GREENHOUSE; MISCANTHUS GIGANTEUS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NONHUMAN; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT GENE; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; PLANT METABOLISM; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; RNA SEQUENCE; RNA TRANSCRIPTION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SORGHUM; SUGARCANE;

EID: 85020005149     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16765680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4238/gmr16028845     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abe H, Urao T, Ito T, Seki M, et al. (2003). Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15: 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.006130
2. Andrade JCF, Terto J, Silva JV and Almeida C (2015). Expression profiles of sugarcane under drought conditions: Variation in gene regulation. Genet. Mol. Biol. 38: 465-469. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-475738420140288
3. Barling A, Swaminathan K, Mitros T, James BT, et al. (2013). A detailed gene expression study of the Miscanthus genus reveals changes in the transcriptome associated with the rejuvenation of spring rhizomes. BMC Genomics 14: 864-879. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-864
4. Barry CS, Blume B, Bouzayen M, Cooper W, et al. (1996). Differential expression of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase gene family of tomato. Plant J. 9: 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.09040525.x
5. Becker-André M, Schulze-Lefert P and Hahlbrock K (1991). Structural comparison, modes of expression, and putative cis-acting elements of the two 4-coumarate: CoA ligase genes in potato. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 8551-8559.
6. Boguski MS, Lowe TM and Tolstoshev CM (1993). dbEST--database for “expressed sequence tags”. Nat. Genet. 4: 332-333. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0893-332
7. Cardoso-Silva CB, Costa EA, Mancini MC, Balsalobre TW, et al. (2014). De novo assembly and transcriptome analysis of contrasting sugarcane varieties. PLoS One 9: e88462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088462
8. Carlin SD and Santos DMM (2009). Indicadores fisiológicos da interação entre déficit hídrico e acidez do solo em cana-de-açúcar. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 44: 1106-1113. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2009000900006
9. Carson DL and Botha FC (2000). Preliminary analysis of expressed sequence tags for sugarcane. Crop Sci. 40: 1769-1779. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4061769x
10. Carson DL and Botha FC (2002). Genes expressed in sugarcane maturing intermodal tissue. Plant Cell Rep. 20: 1075-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0444-1
11. Castro PHL, Tavares RM, Bejarano ER and Azevedo H (2012). SUMO, a heavyweight player in plant abiotic stress responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69: 3269-3283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1094-2
12. Catala R, Ouyang J, Abreu IA, Hu Y, et al. (2007). The Arabidopsis E3 SUMO ligase SIZ1 regulates plant growth and drought responses. Plant Cell 19: 2952-2966. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.049981
13. Chaumont F and Tyerman SD (2014). Aquaporins: highly regulated channels controlling plant water relations. Plant Physiol. 164: 1600-1618. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.233791
14. Chowdhury EK, Choi B, Cho B-K, Kim JK, et al. (2013). Regulation of 4CL, encoding 4-coumarate: coenzyme A ligase, expression in kenaf under diverse stress conditions. Plant Omics 6: 254-262.
15. CONAB-Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2016). Acompanhamento de safra brasileira: Cana-de-açúcar. Quarto levantamento, abril/2016. Available at [http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/16_04_14_09_06_31_boletim_cana_portugues_-_4o_lev_-_15-16.pdf ]. Accessed May 19, 2016.
16. de Araujo PG, Rossi M, de Jesus EM, Saccaro Jr NL, et al. (2005). Transcriptionally active transposable elements in recent hybrid sugarcane. Plant J. 44: 707-717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02579.x
17. Desikan R, A-H-Mackerness S, Hancock JT and Neill SJ (2001). Regulation of the Arabidopsis transcriptome by oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 127: 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.127.1.159
18. Dixon RA and Paiva NL (1995). Stress-induced phenilpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7: 1085-1097. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.7.7.1085
19. Falco MC and Silva-Filho MC (2003). Expression of soybean proteinase inhibitors in transgenic sugarcane plants: Effects on natural defense against Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 41: 761-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00100-1
20. Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, et al. (2012). Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: D1178-D1186. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr944
21. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, et al. (2013). Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 29: 644-652. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1883
22. Grativol C, Regulski M, Bertalan M, McCombie WR, et al. (2014). Sugarcane genome sequencing by methylation filtration provides tools for genomic research in the genus Saccharum. Plant J. 79: 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12539
23. Gui J, Shen J and Li L (2011). Functional characterization of evolutionarily divergent 4-coumarate:coenzyme a ligases in rice. Plant Physiol. 157: 574-586. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.178301
24. Habben JE, Bao X, Bate NJ, DeBruin JL, et al. (2014). Transgenic alteration of ethylene biosynthesis increases grain yield in maize under field drought-stress conditions. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12: 685-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12172
25. Hahlbrock B and Scheel D (1989). Physiology and molecular biology of phenylpropanoid metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 1-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002023
26. Hamberger B and Hahlbrock K (2004). The 4-coumarate: CoA ligase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana comprises one rare, sinapate-activating and three commonly occurring isoenzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 2209-2214. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307307101
27. Hao Y, Oh E, Choi G, Liang Z, et al. (2012). Interactions between HLH and bHLH factors modulate light-regulated plant development. Mol. Plant 5: 688-697. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss011
28. Heim MA, Jakoby M, Werber M, Martin C, et al. (2003). The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family in plants: a genome-wide study of protein structure and functional diversity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 735-747. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg088
29. Ho HL (2015). Functional roles of plant protein kinases in signal transduction pathways during abiotic and biotic stress. J. Biodivers. Biopros. Dev 2: 147-154.
30. Iskandar HM, Casu RE, Fletcher AT, Schmidt S, et al. (2011). Identification of drought-response genes and a study of their expression during sucrose accumulation and water deficit in sugarcane culms. BMC Plant Biol. 11: 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-12
31. Jarzyniak KM and Jasiński M (2014). Membrane transporters and drought resistance-a complex issue. Front. Plant Sci. 5: 687-701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00687
32. Kido EA, Ferreira Neto JRC, Silva RLO, Pandolfi V, et al. (2012). New insights in the sugarcane transcriptome responding to drought stress as revealed by super SAGE. Sci. World J. 2012: 821062. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/821062
33. Kim C, Lee TH, Compton RO, Robertson JS, et al. (2013). A genome-wide BAC end-sequence survey of sugarcane elucidates genome composition, and identifies BACs covering much of the euchromatin. Plant Mol. Biol. 81: 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-012-9987-x
34. Knight H and Knight MR (2001). Abiotic stress signalling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. Trends Plant Sci. 6: 262-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(01)01946-X
35. Kurama EE, Fenille RC, Rosa VE, Jr., Rosa DD, et al. (2002). Mining the enzymes involved in the detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in sugarcane. Mol. Plant Pathol. 3: 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00119.x
36. Langmead B and Salzberg SL (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9: 357-359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
37. Li M, Liang Z, Zeng Y, Jing Y, et al. (2016). Differential expression profiles and pathways of genes in sugarcane leaf at elongation stage in response to drought stress. BMC Genomics 17: 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2552-2
38. Li W and Godzik A (2006). Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22: 1658-1659. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158
39. Lindermayr C, Möllers B, Fliegmann J, Uhlmann A, et al. (2003). Deletion of a Single Amino Acid Residue from Different 4-Coumarate: CoA Ligases from Soybean Results in the Generation of New Substrate Specificitie. Eur. J. Biochem. 269: 1304-1315. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02775.x
40. de Lorenzo L, Merchan F, Laporte P, Thompson R, et al. (2009). A novel plant leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase regulates the response of Medicago truncatula roots to salt stress. Plant Cell 21: 668-680. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.059576
41. Love MI, Huber W and Anders S (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15: 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
42. Lyzenga WJ and Stone SL (2012). Abiotic stress tolerance mediated by protein ubiquitination. J. Exp. Bot. 63: 599-616. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err310
43. McCarthy DJ, Chen Y and Smyth GK (2012). Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: 4288-4297. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks042
44. Mello MO, Tanaka AS and Silva-Filho MC (2003). Molecular evolution of Bowman-Birk type proteinase inhibitors in flowering plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 27: 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00373-1
45. Mirica LM and Klinman JP (2008). The nature of O2 activation by the ethylene-forming enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 1814-1819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711626105
46. Mittler R (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 7: 405-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02312-9
47. Nogueira FT, De Rosa VE, Jr., Menossi M, Ulian EC, et al. (2003). RNA expression profiles and data mining of sugarcane response to low temperature. Plant Physiol. 132: 1811-1824. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.017483
48. Papini-Terzi FS, Rocha FR, Vêncio RZ, Oliveira KC, et al. (2005). Transcription profiling of signal transduction-related genes in sugarcane tissues. DNA Res. 12: 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/12.1.27
49. Pickart CM and Eddins MJ (2004). Ubiquitin: structures, functions, mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1695: 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.09.019
50. Pincelli RP and Silva MA (2012). Alterações morfológicas foliares em cultivares de cana-de-açúcar em resposta à deficiência hídrica. Biosci. J. 28: 546-556.
51. Rocha FR, Papini-Terzi FS, Nishiyama MY, Jr., Vêncio RZN, et al. (2007). Signal transduction-related responses to phytohormones and environmental challenges in sugarcane. BMC Genomics 8: 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-71
52. Rodrigues FA, Laia ML and Zingaretti SM (2009). Analysis of gene expression profiles under water stress in tolerant and sensitive sugarcane plants. Plant Sci. 176: 286-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.11.007
53. Sarikas A, Hartmann T and Pan ZQ (2011). The cullin protein family. Genome Biol. 12: 220. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-4-220
54. Schmelzer E, Kruger-Lebus S and Hahlbrock K (1989). Temporal and Spatial Patterns of Gene Expression around Sites of Attempted Fungal Infection in Parsley Leaves. Plant Cell 1: 993-1001. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.1.10.993
55. Sharma M and Pandey GK (2016). Expansion and function of repeat domain proteins during stress and development in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1218.
56. Sharma B, Joshi D, Yadav PK, Gupta AK, et al. (2016). Role of ubiquitin-mediated degradation system in plant biology. Front. Plant Sci. 7: 806. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00806
57. Shen G, Kuppu S, Venkataramani S, Wang J, et al. (2010). ANKYRIN REPEAT-CONTAINING PROTEIN 2A is an essential molecular chaperone for peroxisomal membrane-bound ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE3 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22: 811-831. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.065979
58. Shiu SH and Bleecker AB (2001). Plant receptor-like kinase gene family: diversity, function, and signaling. Sci. STKE 2001: 22.
59. Silva MA, Jifon JL, Silva JAG and Sharma V (2007). Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 19: 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202007000300003
60. Soares-Costa A, Beltramini LM, Thiemann OH and Henrique-Silva F (2002). A sugarcane cystatin: recombinant expression, purification, and antifungal activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 296: 1194-1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02046-6
61. Sugiharto B, Ermawati N, Mori H, Aoki K, et al. (2002). Identification and characterization of a gene encoding drought-inducible protein localizing in the bundle sheath cell of sugarcane. Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 350-354. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcf039
62. Torii KU (2004). Leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases in plants: structure, function, and signal transduction pathways. Int. Rev. Cytol. 234: 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(04)34001-5
63. Torii KU and Clark SE (2000). Receptor-like kinases in plant development. Adv. Bot. Res. 32: 225-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(00)32026-2
64. Vantini JS, Dedemo GC, Jovino Gimenez DF, Fonseca LF, et al. (2015). Differential gene expression in drought-tolerant sugarcane roots. Genet. Mol. Res. 14: 7196-7207. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.June.29.13
65. Vargas L, Santa Brígida AB, Mota Filho JP, de Carvalho TG, et al. (2014). Drought tolerance conferred to sugarcane by association with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus: a transcriptomic view of hormone pathways. PLoS One 9: e114744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114744
66. Vettore AL, Silva FR, Kemper EL and Arruda P (2001). The libraries that made SUCEST. Genet. Mol. Biol. 24: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572001000100002
67. Vettore AL, da Silva FR, Kemper EL, Souza GM, et al. (2003). Analysis and functional annotation of an expressed sequence tag collection for tropical crop sugarcane. Genome Res. 13: 2725-2735. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1532103
68. Zhang S, Qi Y, Liu M and Yang C (2013). SUMO E3 ligase AtMMS21 regulates drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana (F). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 55: 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12024