The relationship between engagement and neurophysiological measures of attention in motion-controlled video games: A randomized controlled trial

JMIR Serious Games

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Leiker, Amber M ^a   Miller, Matthew ^a   Brewer, Lauren ^a   Nelson, Monica ^a   Siow, Maria ^a   Lohse, Keith ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Engagement; EP3a; Exergame; Games; Kinect; Motivation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019820979     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22919279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/games.5460     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Levac D, Espy D, Fox E, Pradhan S, Deutsch JE. Kinect-ing with clinicians: A knowledge translation resource to support decision making about video game use in rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2015 Mar; 95(3):426-440 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130618] [Medline: 25256741]
2. Donoso Brown EV, Dudgeon B, Gutman K, Moritz CT, McCoy SW. Understanding upper extremity home programs and the use of gaming technology for persons after stroke. Disabil Health J 2015 Oct; 8(4):507-513. [doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.03.007] [Medline: 25953349]
3. Lohse KR, Hilderman CGE, Cheung KL, Tatla S, Van der Loos HFM. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLoS One 2014; 9(3):e93318 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093318] [Medline: 24681826]
4. Hunicke R, Leblanc M, Zubek R. MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. 2004 Presented at: Challenges in Games AI Workshop, Nineteenth National Conference of Artificial Intelligence; July 2004; San Jose, California p. 1-5.
5. Zimmerli L, Jacky M, Lünenburger L, Riener R, Bolliger M. Increasing patient engagement during virtual reality-based motor rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013 Sep; 94(9):1737-1746. [doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.029] [Medline: 23500181]
6. O'Brien H, Toms E. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement in e-commerce environments. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2010; 61:50-69. [doi: 10.1002/asi.v61:1]
7. O'Brien H, Toms E. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2008; 59(6):938-955. [doi: 10.1002/asi.20801]
8. Shirzad N, Van der Loos HFM. Evaluating the user experience of exercising reaching motions with a robot that predicts desired movement difficulty. J Mot Behav 2016; 48(1):31-46. [doi: 10.1080/00222895.2015.1035430] [Medline: 25945816]
9. Lohse K, Shirzad N, Verster A, Hodges N, Van der Loos HFM. Video games and rehabilitation: Using design principles to enhance engagement in physical therapy. J Neurol Phys Ther 2013 Dec; 37(4):166-175. [doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000017] [Medline: 24232363]
10. Lohse K, Boyd L, Hodges N. Engaging environments enhance motor skill learning in a computer gaming task. J Mot Behav 2015 Aug 21:1-11. [doi: 10.1080/00222895.2015.1068158] [Medline: 26296097]
11. Dyke FB, Leiker AM, Grand KF, Godwin MM, Thompson AG, Rietschel JC, et al. The efficacy of auditory probes in indexing cognitive workload is dependent on stimulus complexity. Int J Psychophysiol 2015 Jan; 95(1):56-62. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.12.008] [Medline: 25528402]
12. Suzuki J, Nittono H, Hori T. Level of interest in video clips modulates event-related potentials to auditory probes. Int J Psychophysiol 2005 Jan; 55(1):35-43. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.06.001] [Medline: 15598514]
13. Takeda Y, Okuma T, Kimura M, Kurata T, Takenaka T, Iwaki S. Electrophysiological measurement of interest during walking in a simulated environment. Int J Psychophysiol 2014 Sep; 93(3):363-370. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.05.012] [Medline: 24892726]
14. Miller MW, Rietschel JC, McDonald CG, Hatfield BD. A novel approach to the physiological measurement of mental workload. Int J Psychophysiol 2011 Apr; 80(1):75-78. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.02.003] [Medline: 21320552]
15. Miller MW, Presacco A, Groman L, Bur S, Rietschel J, Gentili R, et al. The effects of team environment on cerebral cortical processes and attentional reserve. Sport Exercise Perform Psychol 2014; 3(1):61-74. [doi: 10.1037/spy0000001]
16. Oostenveld R, Praamstra P. The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clin Neurophysiol 2001 Apr; 112(4):713-719. [Medline: 11275545]
17. Clayson PE, Baldwin SA, Larson MJ. How does noise affect amplitude and latency measurement of event-related potentials (ERPs)? A methodological critique and simulation study. Psychophysiology 2013 Feb; 50(2):174-186. [doi: 10.1111/psyp.12001] [Medline: 23216521]
18. McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exercise Sport 1989 Mar; 60(1):48-58. [doi: 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413] [Medline: 2489825]
19. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A. G∗Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007 May; 39(2):175-191. [Medline: 17695343]
20. Shirzad N, Van der Loos HFM. Evaluating the user experience of exercising reaching motions with a robot that predicts desired movement difficulty. J Mot Behav 2016; 48(1):31-46. [doi: 10.1080/00222895.2015.1035430] [Medline: 25945816]
21. Tatla S, Jarus T, Virji-Babul N, Holsti L. The development of the Pediatric Motivation Scale for rehabilitation. Can J Occup Ther 2015 Apr; 82(2):93-105. [Medline: 26281433]