Electrophysiological measurement of interest during walking in a simulated environment

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 363-370

  Takeda, Yuji ^a   Okuma, Takashi ^a   Kimura, Motohiro ^a   Kurata, Takeshi ^a   Takenaka, Takeshi ^a   Iwaki, Sunao ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Eye fixation related potentials; Interest; Simulator; Task irrelevant probe

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENT; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TIME; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84905497098     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alho K., Töttölä K., Reinikainen K., Sams M., Näätänen R. Brain mechanisms of selective listening reflected by event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987, 68:458-470.
2. Allison B.Z., Polich J. Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm. Biol. Psychol. 2008, 77:277-283.
3. Camerer C., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics. J. Econ. Lit. 2005, 43:9-64.
4. Crowley K.E., Colrain I.M. A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:732-744.
5. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
6. Escera C., Corral M.J. Role of mismatch negativity and novelty-P3 in involuntary auditory attention. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21:251-264.
7. Escera C., Alho K., Winkler I., Näätänen R. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1998, 10:590-604.
8. Fantz R.L. The origin of form perception. Sci. Am. 1961, 204:66-72.
9. Gaarder K., Krauskopf J., Graf V., Kropfl W., Armington J.C. Averaged brain activity following saccadic eye movement. Science 1964, 146:1481-1483.
10. Hillyard S.A., Hink R.F., Schwent V.L., Picton T.W. Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 1973, 182:177-180.
11. Ishikawa T., Thangamani K., Kourogi M., Gee A.P., Mayol-Cuevas W., Hyun J., Kurata T. Interactive 3-D indoor modeler for virtualizing service fields. Virtual Reality 2013, 17:89-109.
12. Izard C.E. Emotion theory and research: highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2009, 60:1-25.
13. Kahneman D. Attention and Effort 1973, Prentice Hall, New York.
14. Kazai K., Yagi A. Comparison between the lambda response of eye-fixation-related potentials and the P100 component of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2003, 3:46-56.
15. Kramer A.F., Trejo L.J., Humphrey D. Assessment of mental workload with task-irrelevant auditory probes. Biol. Psychol. 1995, 40:83-100.
16. Mehta R.K., Parasuraman R. Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:889. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889.
17. Miller M.W., Rietschel J.C., McDonald C.G., Hatfield B.D. A novel approach to the physiological measurement of mental workload. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2011, 80:75-78.
18. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive functioning. Behav. Brain Sci. 1990, 13:201-287.
19. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sounds: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425.
20. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:2544-2590.
21. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:2128-2148.
22. Rif J., Hari R., Hämäläinen M.S., Sams M. Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1991, 79:464-472.
23. Rosenfeld J.P., Bhat K., Miltenberger A., Johnson M. Event-related potentials in the dual task paradigm: P300 discriminates engaging and non-engaging films when film-viewing is the primary task. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1992, 12:221-232.
24. Schröger E. Mismatch negativity: a microphone into auditory memory. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21:138-146.
25. Scott D.F., Groethuysen U.C., Bickford R.G. Lambda responses in the human electroencephalogram. Neurology 1967, 17:770-778.
26. Soltani M., Knight R.T. Neural origins of the P300. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 2000, 14:199-224.
27. Stévens J.C., Hall J.W. Brightness and loudness as functions of stimulus duration. Percept. Psychophys. 1966, 1:319-327.
28. Sugimoto F., Katayama J. Somatosensory P2 reflects resource allocation in a game task: assessment with an irrelevant probe technique using electrical probe stimuli to shoulders. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2013, 87:200-204.
29. Suzuki J., Nittono H., Hori T. Level of interest in video clips modulates event-related potentials to auditory probes. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2005, 55:35-43.
30. Takeda Y., Sugai M., Yagi A. Eye fixation related potentials in a proof reading task. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2001, 40:181-186.
31. Takeda Y., Yoshitsugu N., Itoh K., Kanamori N. Assessment of attentional workload while driving by eye-fixation-related potentials. Kansei Eng. Int. J. 2012, 11:121-126.
32. Ullsperger P., Freude G., Erdmann U. Auditory probe sensitivity to mental workload changes - an event-related potential study. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2001, 40:201-209.
33. Yagi A. Visual signal detection and lambda responses. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1981, 52:604-610.
34. Yagi A., Ishida K., Katayama J. Contour effects on potentials associated with eye fixation. Psychologia 1992, 35:50-54.