Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond

Environmental Politics

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 561-579

  Bäckstrand, Karin ^a   Kuyper, Jonathan W ^a,b   Linnér, Björn Ola ^c,d   Lövbrand, Eva ^c  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019688546     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485     Document Type: Editorial

References (60)

1. Abbott, K.W., 2012. The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C:Government and Policy, 30 (4), 571–590. doi:10.1068/c11127
2. Allan, J.I., and Hadden, J., 2017. Exploring the framing power of NGOs in global climate politics. Environmental Politics, 26 (4).
3. Bäckstrand, K., 2008. Accountability of networked climate governance:the rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (3), 74–102. doi:10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74
4. Bäckstrand, K., and Kronsell, A., 2015. Rethinking the Green State. Environmental governance towards climate and sustainability transitions. London:Routledge.
5. Bäckstrand, K., and Kuyper, J.W., 2017. The democratic legitimacy of orchestration:the UNFCCC, non-state actors, and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics, 26 (4).
6. Bäckstrand, K., and Lövbrand, E., 2015. The research handbook on climate governance. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
7. Bang, G., Hovi, J., and Skodvin, T., 2016. The Paris Agreement:short-term and long-term effectiveness. Politics and Governance, 4 (3), 209–218. doi:10.17645/pag.v4i3.640
8. Bernauer, T., and McGrath, L.F., 2016. Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6, 680–683. doi:10.1038/nclimate2948
9. Betsill, M.M., 2015. NGOs. In:K., Bäckstrand and E., Lövbrand, eds. Research handbook on climate governance. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar, 251–261.
10. Betsill, M.M., and Corell, E., 2001. NGO influence in international environmental negotiations:a framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 1 (4), 65–85. doi:10.1162/152638001317146372
11. Betsill, M., et al., 2015. Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader climate governance landscape. Global Environmental Politics, 15 (2), 1–10. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00294
12. Bodansky, D., 2012. The Durban platform:issues and options for a 2015 agreement. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. December 2012.
13. Bodansky, D., 2015. Reflections on the Paris Conference. Opinio Juris. Available from:http://opiniojuris.org/2015/12/15/reflections-on-the-paris-conference/ [Accessed 19March 2016].
14. Bodansky, D., 2016. The legal character of the Paris agreement. Working paper.
15. Börzel, T.A., and Risse, T., 2005. Effective and legitimate tools of international governance? In:E., Grande and L.W., Pauly, eds. Complex sovereignty:on the reconstitution of political authority in the 21st century. Toronto:Toronto University Press, 195–216.
16. Brun, A., 2016. Conference diplomacy:the making of the Paris agreement. Politics and Governance, 4 (3), 115–123. doi:10.17645/pag.v4i3.649
17. Bulkeley, H., et al., 2014. Transnational climate change governance. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
18. Busby, J., 2016. After Paris:good enough climate governance. Current History, January 3-9.
19. Cabré, M., 2011. Issue-linkages to climate change measured through NGO participation in the UNFCCC. Global Environmental Politics, 11 (3), 10–22. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00066
20. Chan, S., et al., 2015a. Reinvigorating international climate policy:a comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6 (4), 466–473. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12294
21. Chan, S., et al., 2015b. Strengthening non-state climate action:a progress assessment if commitments launched at the 2014 UN Climate Summit. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Papers No. 242 and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics.
22. Chan, S., Brandi, C., and Bauer, S., 2016. Aligning transnational climate action with international climate governance:the road from Paris. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25 (2), 238–247. doi:10.1111/reel.12168
23. Christoff, P., 2016. The promissory note:COP21 and the Paris Climate Agreement. Environmental Politics, 25 (5), 765–787. doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1191818
24. Clémençon, R., 2016. The two sides of the Paris Climate Agreement. TheJournal of Environment & Development, 25 (1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/1070496516631362
25. Cole, D.H., 2015. Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 5 (2), 114–118. doi:10.1038/nclimate2490
26. Dimitrov, R.S., 2016. The Paris agreement on climate change:behind closed doors. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (3), 1–11. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00361
27. Dryzek, J.S., 2017. The meanings of life for non-state actors in climate politics. Environmental Politics, 26 (4).
28. Falkner, R., 2016. The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 95 (2), 1–28.
29. Fisher, D.R., 2010. COP-15 in Copenhagen:how the merging of movements left civil society out in the cold. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (2), 11–17. doi:10.1162/glep.2010.10.2.11
30. Fuss, S., et al., 2014. Betting on negative emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4, 850–853. doi:10.1038/nclimate2392
31. Green, J.F., 2014. Rethinking private authority:agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton:Princeton University Press.
32. Hadden, J., 2015. Networks in contention:the divisive politics of climate change. New York:Cambridge University Press.
33. Hale, T., 2016. “All hands on deck”:the Paris Agreement and non-state climate action. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (3), 12–22. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00362
34. Hickman, T., 2016. Rethinking authority in global climate governance. London:Routledge.
35. Hoffmann, M.J., 2011. Climate governance at the crossroads:experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
36. Hsu, A., et al., 2015. Towards a new climate diplomacy. Nature Climate Change, 5, 501–503. doi:10.1038/nclimate2594
37. IPCC, 2014. International cooperation:agreements and instruments in climate change 2014:mitigation of climate change. Working Group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
38. Jordan, A., et al., 2015. Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5, 977–982. doi:10.1038/nclimate2725
39. Kuchler, M., 2017. The human rights turn:ENGOs changing tactics in the quest for a more transparent, participatory and accountable CDM. Environmental Politics, 26 (4).
40. Lövbrand, E., Hjerpe, M., and Linnér, B.-J., 2017. Making climate governance global:how UN climate summitry comes to matter in a complex climate regime. Environmental Politics, 26 (4).
41. Nasiritousi, N., 2016. Shapers, brokers and doers:the dynamic roles of non-state actors in global climate change governance. Thesis (PhD). Linköping University.
42. Nasiritousi, N., 2017. Fossil fuel emitters and climate change:unpacking the governance activities of large oil and gas companies. Environmental Politics, 26 (4).
43. Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., and Linnér, B.-O., 2016. The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance:understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements:Politics, Law and Economics, 16 (1), 109–126. doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8
44. Newell, P., 2000. Climate for change. Non-state actors and the global politics of greenhouse. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
45. Orr, S., 2016. Institutional control and climate change activism at COP21 in Paris. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (3), 23–30. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00363
46. Parker, C., et al., 2012. Fragmented climate change leadership:making sense of the ambiguous outcome of COP-15. Environmental Politics, 21 (2), 268–286. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.651903
47. Savaresi, A.-L., 2016. The Paris Agreement:a new beginning? Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 34 (1), 16–26. doi:10.1080/02646811.2016.1133983
48. Schmidt, V.A., 2013. Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited:input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61 (1), 2–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
49. Sovacool, B., Linnér, B.-O., and Goodsite, M., 2015. The political economy of climate adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 5 (7), 616–618. doi:10.1038/nclimate2665
50. UNFCCC, 2010. Report of the conference of the parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban Report of the Subsidiary Body for Implementation on its thirty-second session. FCCC/SBI/2010/10. from 31 May to 9 June 2010UNFCCC (2011). Conference of the Parties from 28 November to 11 December 2011, UNFCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1
51. UNFCCC, 2015a. Paris Agreement. FCCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1.
52. UNFCCC, 2015b. Draft decision -/CP.21. FCCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1.
53. UNFCCC, 2015c. Synthesis report on the aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions:note by the secretariat. FCCC/CP/2015/7, 30 October 2015. Available from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/07.pdf
54. UNFCCC, 2015d. Technical Annex - Synthesis report on the aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions. Available from: http://unfccc.int/files/focus/indc_portal/application/pdf/technical_annex_-_synthesis_report_on_the_aggregate_effect_of_the_intended_nationally_determined_contributions.pdf
55. UNFCCC, 2016. Roadmap for global climate action. Available from: http://newsroom.unfccc.int/media/658505/high-level-champions-climate-action-roadmap.pdf http://newsroom.unfccc.int/media/658505/high-level-champions-climate-action-roadmap.pdf http://newsroom.unfccc.int/media/658505/high-level-champions-climate-action-roadmap.pdf http://newsroom.unfccc.int/media/658505/high-level-champions-climate-action-roadmap.pdf
56. van Asselt, H., 2016. The role of non-state actors in reviewing in ambition, implementation, and compliance in the Paris Agreement. Climate Law, 6 (1), 91–108.
57. Victor, D.G., 2011. Global warming gridlock:creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
58. Widerberg, O., 2017. The ‘Black Box’ problem of orchestration:how to evaluate the performance of the Lima-Paris Action Agenda. Environmental Politics, 26 (4).
59. Widerberg, O., and Pattberg, P., 2015. International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance:raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC? Global Policy, 6 (1), 45–56. doi:10.1111/gpol.2015.6.issue-1
60. Zelli, F., Möller, I., and van Asselt, H., 2017. Institutional complexity and private authority in global climate governance:the cases of climate engineering, REDD+, and short-lived climate pollutants. Environmental Politics, 26 (4).