Making climate governance global: how UN climate summitry comes to matter in a complex climate regime

Environmental Politics

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 580-599

  Lövbrand, Eva ^a   Hjerpe, Mattias ^a   Linnér, Björn Ola ^a,b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

climate governance; global connections; non state actors; regime complex; survey; UN Climate Change Conferences

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; SURVEY; UNITED NATIONS;

EID: 85018687566     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1319019     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abbott, K.W., et al., eds., 2015. International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
2. Amit, V., ed., 2000. Constructing the field. Ethnographic field work in the contemporary world. London:Routledge.
3. Bäckstrand, K., 2011. The democratic legitimacy of global climate governance after Copenhagen. In:J., Dryzek, R., Norgaard, and D., Schlosberg, eds. Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 669–684.
4. Bäckstrand, K., and Kuyper, J., 2017. The democratic legitimacy of orchestration:the UNFCCC, non-state actors, and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics, 26 (4).
5. Bäckstrand, K., and Lövbrand, E., eds., 2015. Research handbook on climate governance. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
6. Betsill, M., 2015. NGOs. In:K., Bäckstrand and E., Lövbrand, eds. Research handbook on climate governance. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar, 251–261.
7. Betsill, M., and Corell, E., 2008. NGO diplomacy:the influence of non-governmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge:MIT Press.
8. Betzold, C., Castro, P., and Weiler, F., 2012. AOSIS in the UNFCCC negotiations:from unity to fragmentation? Climate Policy, 12 (5), 591–613. doi:10.1080/14693062.2012.692205
9. Bodansky, D., 2010. The Copenhagen climate conference:a post-mortem. American Journal of International Law, 104 (2), 230–240. doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.104.2.0230
10. Bulkeley, H., et al., 2014. Transnational climate change governance. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
11. Campbell, L.M., et al., 2014. Studying global environmental meetings to understand global environmental governance:collaborative event ethnography at the tenth conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity. Global Environmental Politics, 14 (3), 1–20. doi:10.1162/GLEP_e_00236
12. Chan, S., and Pauw, P., 2014. A Global Framework for Climate Action (GFCA):orchestrating nonstate and subnational initiatives for more effective global climate governance, Discussion Paper 34/2014. Bonn:German Development Institute.
13. Chan, S., et al., 2015. Reinvigorating international climate policy:a comprehensive framework for effective non-state action. Global Policy, 6 (4), 466–473. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12294
14. Christoff, P., 2016. The promissory note:COP 21 and the Paris climate agreement. Environmental Politics, 25 (5), 765–787. doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1191818
15. Death, C., 2010. Governing sustainable development. Partnerships, protests and power at the world summit. London:Routledge.
16. Death, C., 2011. Summit theatre:exemplary governmentality and environmental diplomacy in Johannesburg and Copenhagen. Environmental Politics, 20 (1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.538161
17. Editorial, 2016. A milestone year? The unprecedented climate events of 2015 should prompt action on the policy stage. Nature Climate Change, 6 (1), 1. doi:10.1038/nclimate2911
18. ENB, 2016. Earth negotiations bulletin:summary of the Bonn climate change conference 16-26 May 2016. Available from:http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb12676e.pdf [Accessed 1June 2016].
19. Fisher, D., 2010. COP-15 in Copenhagen:how the merging of movements left civil society out in the cold. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (2), 11–17. doi:10.1162/glep.2010.10.2.11
20. Hadden, J., 2015. Networks in contention. The divisive politics of climate change. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
21. Hale, T., and Roger, C., 2014. Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organization, 9 (1), 59–82. doi:10.1007/s11558-013-9174-0
22. Hale, T., 2016. “All hands on deck”:The Paris agreement and non-state climate action. Global Environmental Politics 16 (3), 12–21.
23. Hanegraaff, M.C., 2015. Interest groups at transnational negotiation conferences:goals, strategies, interactions, and influence. Global Governance, 21 (4), 599–620. doi:10.5555/1075-2846-21.4.599
24. Hjerpe, M., and Buhr, K., 2014. Frames of climate change in side events from Kyoto to Durban. Global Environmental Politics, 14 (2), 102–121. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00231
25. Hjerpe, M., and Linnér, B.-O., 2010. The functions of side events in global climate change governance. Climate Policy, 10 (2), 167–180. doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0617
26. Hoffman, M., 2011. Climate governance at the cross-roads. Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
27. Jordan, A., et al., 2015. Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5 (11), 977–982. doi:10.1038/nclimate2725
28. Keohane, R., and Victor, D., 2011. The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9 (1), 7–23. doi:10.1017/S1537592710004068
29. Muñoz Cabré, M., 2011. Issue-linkages to climate change measured through NGO participation in the UNFCCC. Global Environmental Politics, 11 (3), 10–22. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00066
30. Nasiritousi, N., 2017. Fossil fuel emitters and climate change:unpacking the governance activities of large oil and gas companies. Environmental Politics, 26 (4).
31. Nasiritousi, N., and Linnér, B.-O., 2016. Open or closed meetings? Explaining non-state actor involvement in the international climate change negotiations. International Environmental Agreements:Politics, Law & Economics, 16 (1), 127–144. doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9237-6
32. New York Times, 2015. With marches banned, shoes carry a message. Available from:http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/climate/2015-paris-climate-talks/silent-rally-activists-shoes [Accessed 3March 2016].
33. Orr, S.K., 2016. Institutional control and climate change activism at COP 21 in Paris. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (3), 23–30. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00363
34. Schatz, E., ed., 2009. Political ethnography. What immersion contributes to the study of power. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
35. Schroeder, H., Boykoff, M.T., and Spiers, L., 2012. Equity and state representations in climate negotiations. Nature Climate Change, 2 (12), 834–836. doi:10.1038/nclimate1742
36. Stripple, J., and Bulkeley, H., eds., 2014. Governing the climate. New approaches to rationality, power and politics. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
37. Tsing, A., 2005. Friction. An ethnography of global connections. Princeton:Princeton University Press.
38. Tsing, A., 2016. The mushroom at the end of the world. On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton:Princeton University Press.
39. UNFCCC, 2016. Decision 1/CP.21. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1.
40. Victor, D., 2011. Global warming gridlock. Creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
41. Zelli, F., and van Asselt, H., 2015. Fragmentation. In:K., Bäckstrand and E., Lövbrand, eds. Research handbook on climate governance. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar, 121–131.