Viscoelastic Tissue Plasminogen Activator Challenge Predicts Massive Transfusion in 15 Minutes

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 225, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 138-147

  Moore, Hunter B ^a   Moore, Ernest E ^a,c   Chapman, Michael P ^a   Huebner, Benjamin R ^a   Einersen, Peter M ^a   Oushy, Solimon ^a   Silliman, Christopher C ^a,d   Banerjee, Anirban ^a   Sauaia, Angela ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Food Science and Human Nutrition   (United States)

^c DENVER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Bonfils Blood Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG MEGADOSE; FEMALE; GUNSHOT INJURY; HEART ARREST; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; LOW DRUG DOSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PENETRATING TRAUMA; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTHROMBIN TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOCK; THROMBOELASTOGRAPHY; VISCOELASTICITY; YOUDEN INDEX; BLOOD CLOTTING TEST; COMPLICATION; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HEMORRHAGE; INJURY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; BLOOD COAGULATION TESTS; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; THROMBELASTOGRAPHY; TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR; TRAUMA CENTERS; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 85019481700     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Mutschler, M., Nienaber, U., Munzberg, M., et al. The Shock Index revisited—a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A retrospective analysis on 21,853 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU. Crit Care, 17, 2013, R172.
2. Yucel, N., Lefering, R., Maegele, M., et al. Trauma Associated Severe Hemorrhage (TASH)-score: probability of mass transfusion as surrogate for life threatening hemorrhage after multiple trauma. J Trauma 60 (2006), 1228–1236 discussion 1236–1237.
3. Mina, M.J., Winkler, A.M., Dente, C.J., Let technology do the work: Improving prediction of massive transfusion with the aid of a smartphone application. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75 (2013), 669–675.
4. Tonglet, M.L., Minon, J.M., Seidel, L., et al. Prehospital identification of trauma patients with early acute coagulopathy and massive bleeding: results of a prospective non-interventional clinical trial evaluating the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS). Crit Care, 18, 2014, 648.
5. Brockamp, T., Nienaber, U., Mutschler, M., et al. Predicting on-going hemorrhage and transfusion requirement after severe trauma: a validation of six scoring systems and algorithms on the TraumaRegister DGU. Crit Care, 16, 2012, R129.
6. Cotton, B.A., Faz, G., Hatch, Q.M., et al. Rapid thrombelastography delivers real-time results that predict transfusion within 1 hour of admission. J Trauma 71 (2011), 407–414 discussion 414–417.
7. Gonzalez, E., Pieracci, F.M., Moore, E.E., Kashuk, J.L., Coagulation abnormalities in the trauma patient: the role of point-of-care thromboelastography. Semin Thromb Hemost 36 (2010), 723–737.
8. Brohi, K., Cohen, M.J., Davenport, R.A., Acute coagulopathy of trauma: mechanism, identification and effect. Curr Opin Crit Care 13 (2007), 680–685.
9. Brohi, K., Singh, J., Heron, M., Coats, T., Acute traumatic coagulopathy. J Trauma 54 (2003), 1127–1130.
10. Brohi, K., Cohen, M.J., Ganter, M.T., et al. Acute traumatic coagulopathy: initiated by hypoperfusion: modulated through the protein C pathway?. Ann Surg 245 (2007), 812–818.
11. Peltan, I.D., Vande Vusse, L.K., Maier, R.V., Watkins, T.R., An international normalized ratio-based definition of acute traumatic coagulopathy is associated with mortality, venous thromboembolism, and multiple organ failure after injury. Crit Care Med 43 (2015), 1429–1438.
12. Kutcher, M.E., Ferguson, A.R., Cohen, M.J., A principal component analysis of coagulation after trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74 (2013), 1223–1229 discussion 1229–1230.
13. Chin, T.L., Moore, E.E., Moore, H.B., et al. A principal component analysis of postinjury viscoelastic assays: clotting factor depletion versus fibrinolysis. Surgery 156 (2014), 570–577.
14. Moore, H.B., Moore, E.E., Gonzalez, E., et al. Hyperfibrinolysis, physiologic fibrinolysis, and fibrinolysis shutdown: the spectrum of postinjury fibrinolysis and relevance to antifibrinolytic therapy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77 (2014), 811–817 discussion 817.
15. Moore, H.B., Moore, E.E., Lawson, P.J., et al. Fibrinolysis shutdown phenotype masks changes in rodent coagulation in tissue injury versus hemorrhagic shock. Surgery 158 (2015), 386–392.
16. Moore, H.B., Moore, E.E., Gonzalez, E., et al. Plasma is the physiologic buffer of tissue plasminogen activator-mediated fibrinolysis: rationale for plasma-first resuscitation after life-threatening hemorrhage. J Am Coll Surg 220 (2015), 872–879.
17. Moore, H.B., Moore, E.E., Gonzalez, E., et al. Hemolysis exacerbates hyperfibrinolysis, whereas platelolysis shuts down fibrinolysis: evolving concepts of the spectrum of fibrinolysis in response to severe injury. Shock 43 (2015), 39–46.
18. Moore, H.B., Moore, E.E., Chapman, M.P., et al. Viscoelastic measurements of platelet function, not fibrinogen function, predicts sensitivity to tissue-type plasminogen activator in trauma patients. J Thromb Haemost 13 (2015), 1878–1887.
19. Moren, A.M., Hamptom, D., Diggs, B., et al. Recursive partitioning identifies greater than 4 U of packed red blood cells per hour as an improved massive transfusion definition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79 (2015), 920–924.
20. Nunez, T.C., Voskresensky, I.V., Dossett, L.A., et al. Early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: simple as ABC (assessment of blood consumption)?. J Trauma 66 (2009), 346–352.
21. Schisterman, E.F., Perkins, N.J., Liu, A., Bondell, H., Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden Index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology 16 (2005), 73–81.
22. Pottecher, J., Ageron, F.X., Fauche, C., et al. Prehospital SI and pulse pressure/heart rate ratio to predict massive transfusion after severe trauma: retrospective analysis of a large regional trauma database. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81 (2016), 713–722.
23. Wo, C.C., Shoemaker, W.C., Appel, P.L., et al. Unreliability of blood pressure and heart rate to evaluate cardiac output in emergency resuscitation and critical illness. Crit Care Med 21 (1993), 218–223.
24. Binner, C., Selinski, S., Barysch, M.J., et al. Munich Oktoberfest experience: remarkable impact of sex and age in ethanol intoxication. Arch Toxicol 82 (2008), 933–939.
25. Krumrei, N.J., Park, M.S., Cotton, B.A., Zielinski, M.D., Comparison of massive blood transfusion predictive models in the rural setting. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72 (2012), 211–215.
26. De Jong, A., Deras, P., Martinez, O., et al. Relationship between obesity and massive transfusion needs in trauma patients, and validation of TASH score in obese population: a retrospective study on 910 trauma patients. PLoS One, 11, 2016, e0152109.
27. Maegele, M., Lefering, R., Wafaisade, A., et al. Revalidation and update of the TASH-Score: a scoring system to predict the probability for massive transfusion as a surrogate for life-threatening haemorrhage after severe injury. Vox Sang 100 (2011), 231–238.
28. Hilbert-Carius, P., Hofmann, G.O., Lefering, R., et al. Clinical presentation and blood gas analysis of multiple trauma patients for prediction of standard coagulation parameters at emergency department arrival. Anaesthesist 65 (2016), 274–280.
29. Callcut, R.A., Cripps, M.W., Nelson, M.F., et al. The massive transfusion score as a decision aid for resuscitation: learning when to turn the massive transfusion protocol on and off. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80 (2016), 450–456.
30. Beynon, C., Erk, A.G., Potzy, A., et al. Point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 23, 2015, 58.
31. Goodman, M.D., Makley, A.T., Hanseman, D.J., et al. All the bang without the bucks: defining essential point-of-care testing for traumatic coagulopathy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79 (2015), 117–124 discussion 124.
32. Chapman, M.P., Moore, E.E., Moore, H.B., et al. Overwhelming tPA release, not PAI-1 degradation, is responsible for hyperfibrinolysis in severely injured trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80 (2016), 16–23 discussion 25.
33. Schochl, H., Cadamuro, J., Seidl, S., et al. Hyperfibrinolysis is common in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: results from a prospective observational thromboelastometry study. Resuscitation 84 (2013), 454–459.
34. Zaar, M., Fedyk, C.G., Pidcoke, H.F., et al. Platelet activation after presyncope by lower body negative pressure in humans. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e116174.
35. Gonzalez, E., Moore, E.E., Moore, H.B., et al. Goal-directed hemostatic resuscitation of trauma-induced coagulopathy: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial comparing a viscoelastic assay to conventional coagulation assays. Ann Surg 263 (2016), 1051–1059.
36. Moore, H.B., Moore, E.E., Chin, T.L., et al. Activated clotting time of thrombelastography (T-ACT) predicts early postinjury blood component transfusion beyond plasma. Surgery 156 (2014), 564–569.
37. Zatta, A.J., McQuilten, Z.K., Mitra, B., et al. Elucidating the clinical characteristics of patients captured using different definitions of massive transfusion. Vox Sang 107 (2014), 60–70.
38. Gurbel, P.A., Bliden, K.P., Tantry, U.S., et al. First report of the point-of-care TEG: a technical validation study of the TEG-6S system. Platelets 27 (2016), 642–649.
39. Etchill, E., Sperry, J., Zuckerbraun, B., et al. The confusion continues: results from an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma survey on massive transfusion practices among United States trauma centers. Transfusion 56 (2016), 2478–2486.