The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and gender on substantial assistance departures in federal courts

Race and Justice

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 49-78

  Spohn, Cassia ^a   Brennan, Pauline K ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug laws; Presumptive sentencing; Race and sentencing; Sentencing guidelines; Stereotypes

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019441105     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21533687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2153368710396228     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Albonetti, C. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
2. Albonetti, C. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses. Law and Society Review, 31, 789-822.
3. Albonetti, C. A. (2002). The joint conditioning effect of defendant’s gender and ethnicity on length of imprisonment under federal sentencing guidelines for drug trafficking/manufacturing offenders. Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice, 6, 39-60.
4. Barak, G. (1994). Between the waves: Mass-mediated themes of crime and justice. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 21, 133-147.
5. Barlow, M. H. (1998). Race and the problem of crime in '‘Time’' and '‘Newsweek’' cover stories, 1946 to 1995. Social Justice, 25, 149-183.
6. Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York, NY: Free Press.
7. Belknap, J. (1996). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
8. Bernstein, I. N., Kelley, W. R., & Doyle, P.A. (1977). Societal reaction to deviants: A case of criminal defendants. American Sociological Review, 42, 743-755.
9. Bernstein, I, Kick, E., Leung, J. T., & Schultz, B. (1977). Charge reduction: An intermediate stage in the process of labeling criminal defendants. Social Forces, 56, 362-384.
10. Bickle, G. S., & Peterson, R. D. (1991). The impact of gender-based family roles on criminal sentencing. Social Problems, 38, 372-394.
11. Bond-Maupin, L. (1998). '‘That wasn’t even me they showed’': Women as criminals on America’s Most Wanted. Violence Against Women, 4, 30-44.
12. Brennan, P. K. (2002). Women sentenced to jail in New York City. New York, NY: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
13. Brennan, P. K. (2006). Sentencing female misdemeanants: An examination of the direct and indirect effects of race/ethnicity. Justice Quarterly, 23, 60-95.
14. Brennan, P. K. (2009). The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and sex on sentencing outcomes. In M. D. Krohn, A. J. Lizotte, & G. P. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of crime and deviance. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
15. Brennan, P. K., & Spohn, C. (2008). Race/ethnicity and sentencing outcomes among drug offenders in North Carolina. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 371-398.
16. Brennan, P. K., & Spohn, C. (2009). The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and sex on sentence length decisions in federal courts. Race and Social Problems, 1, 200-217.
17. Brennan, P. K., & Vandenberg, A. L. (2009). Depictions of female offenders in front-page newspaper stories: The importance of race/ethnicity. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 2, 141-175.
18. Castro, D. O. (1998). ‘Hot blood and easy virtue’: Mass media and the making of racist latino/a stereotypes. In C. R. Mann & M. S. Zatz (Eds.), Images of color, images of crime (pp. 134-144). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.
19. Chermak, S. (1994). Body count news: How crime is presented in the news media. Justice Quarterly, 11(4), 561-582.
20. Chiricos, T. G., & Crawford, C. (1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. In D. F. Hawkins (Ed.), Ethnicity, race, and crime: Perspectives across time and space (pp. 281-309). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
21. Crawford, C. (2000). Gender, race, and habitual offender sentencing in Florida. Criminology, 38, 263-280.
22. Crew, K. B. (1991). Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy? Justice Quarterly, 8, 59-84.
23. Crow, M. S., & Johnson, K. A. (2008). Race, ethnicity, and habitual-offender sentencing: A multilevel analysis of individual contextual threat. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 63-83.
24. Curry, T. R., & Corral-Camacho, G. (2008). Sentencing young minority males for drug offenses: Testing for conditional effects between race/ethnicity, gender, and age during the U.S. war on drugs. Punishment & Society, 10, 253-276.
25. Daly, K., & Bordt, R. L. (1995). Sex effects and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12, 141-175.
26. Daly, K., & Tonry, M. (1997). Gender, race, and sentencing. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research, volume 22 (pp. 201-252). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27. Dates, J. L., & Pease, E. C. (1997). Warping the world-Media’s mangled images of race. In E. E. Dennis & E. C. Pease (Eds.), The media in black and white (pp. 77-82). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
28. Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, S. (2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: Comparisons among white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 994-1011.
29. Doerner, J. K. & Demuth, S. (2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 1-27.
30. Engen, R. L. & Gainey, R. R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207-1229.
31. Engen, R. L., Gainey, R. R., Crutchfield, R. D., & Weis, J. G. (2003). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured alternatives. Criminology, 41, 99-130.
32. Entman, R. (1990). Modern racism and the images of blacks in local television news. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 332-345.
33. Entman, R. (1992). Blacks in the news: Television, modern racism and cultural change. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 341-361.
34. Entman, R. (1994). Representation and reality in the portrayal of blacks on network television news. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 509-520.
35. Entman, R. (1997). African Americans according to TV news. In E. E. Dennis & E. C. Pease (Eds.), The media in black and white (pp. 29-36). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
36. Everett, R. S., & Wojkiewicz, R. A. (2002). Difference, disparity, and race/ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 189-211.
37. Farnworth, M., & Teske, R. H. C, Jr. (1995). Gender differences in felony court processing: Three hypotheses of disparity. Women & Criminal Justice, 6, 23-44.
38. Farr, K. A. (1997). Aggravating and differentiating factors in the cases of white and minority women on death row. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 260-278.
39. Farr, K. A. (2000). Defeminizing and dehumanizing female murderers: Depictions of lesbians on death row. Women & Criminal Justice, 11, 49-66.
40. Freiburger, T. L., & Hilinski, C. M. (2009). An examination of the interactions of race and gender on sentencing decisions using a trichotomous dependent variable. Crime & Delinquency, Published online February 24, 2009, doi: 10.1177/0011128708330178.
41. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
42. Griffin, T., & Wooldredge, J. (2006). Sex-based disparities in felony dispositions before versus after sentencing reform in Ohio. Criminology, 44, 893-923.
43. Gruhl, J., Welch, S., & Spohn, C. (1984). Women as criminal defendants: A test for paternalism. The Western Political Science Quarterly, 37, 456-467.
44. Harris, A. R. (1977). Sex and theories of deviance: Toward a functional theory of deviant type-scripts. American Sociological Review, 42, 3-16.
45. Hartley, R. D., Maddan, S., & Spohn, C. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in Federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, 24, 382-407.
46. Healey, J. F. (1997). Race, ethnicity, and gender in the United States: Inequality, group conflict, and power. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
47. Heilbrun, A. B. (1982). Female criminals: Behavior and treatment within the criminal justice system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 341-351.
48. Hofer, P. J., Blackwell, K. R., & Ruback, R. B. (1999). The effect of the federal sentencing guidelines on inter-judge disparity. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 90, 239-321.
49. Huckerby, J. (2003). Women who kill their children: Case study and conclusions concerning the differences in the fall from maternal grace by Khoua and Andrea Yates. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 10, 149-172.
50. Humphries, D. (1981). Serious crime, news coverage, and ideology: A content analysis of crime coverage in a metropolitan newspaper. Crime & Delinquency, 27, 191-205.
51. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1997). Public perceptions of race and crime: The role of racial stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 375-401.
52. Johnson, B. E., Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 737-783.
53. Kautt, P. M. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19, 633-672.
54. Kempf-Leonard, K., & Sample, L. L. (2001). Have the federal sentencing guidelines reduced severity? An examination of one circuit. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 46, 737-783.
55. Klein, D. (1995). The etiology of female crime: A review of the literature. B. R. Price and N. J. Sokoloff, The criminal justice system and women: Offenders, victims, and workers (pp. 30-53). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
56. Koons-Witt, B. (2002). The effect of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 297-328.
57. Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. T. (1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 81-106.
58. Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. T. (2002). Downward departures for serious violent offenders: Local court '‘corrections’' to Pennsylvania’s sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 897-932.
59. Kruttschnitt, C. (1980-1981). Social statuses and the sentences of female offenders. Law and Society Review, 15, 247-265.
60. Kruttschnitt, C. (1982). Women, crime, and dependency: An application of the Theory of Law. Criminology, 19, 495-513.
61. Kruttschnitt, C. (1984). Sex and criminal court dispositions: The unresolved controversy. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 213-232.
62. Kurokawa, M. (1971). Mutual perceptions of racial images: White, black, and Japanese Americans. Journal of Social Issues, 27, 213-235.
63. LaCasse, C. & Payne, A. A. (1999). Federal sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences: Do defendants bargain in the shadow of the judge? Journal of Law and Economics, 42, 245-269.
64. LaFrenz, C., & Spohn, C. (2006). Who is punished more harshly? An examination of race/ethnicity, gender, age and employment status under the federal sentencing guidelines. Justice Research and Policy, 8, 25-56.
65. Landrine, H. (1985). Race class stereotypes of women. Sex Roles, 13, 65-75.
66. Madriz, E. (1997). Images of criminals and victims: A study on women’s fear and social control. Gender & Society, 11, 342-356.
67. Maxfield, L. D., & Kramer, J. (1998). Substantial assistance: An empirical yardstick gauging equity in current federal policy and practice. Washington, DC: United States Sentencing Commission.
68. Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 439-466.
69. Mustard, D. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from U.S. federal courts. Journal of Law & Economics, 44, 285-314.
70. Nagel, I. H., & Johnson, B. L. (1994). The role of gender in a structured sentencing system: Equal treatment, policy choices, and the sentencing of female offenders under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85, 181-221.
71. Nagel, I. H., & Schulhofer, S. J. (1992). A tale of three cities: An empirical study of charging and bargaining practices under the federal sentencing guidelines. Southern California Law Review, 66, 501-566.
72. Nagel, S. S., & Weitzman, L. J. (1971). Women as litigants. Hastings Law Journal, 23, 171-198.
73. Peffley, M., Shields, T., & Williams, B. (1996). The intersection of race and crime in television news stories: An experimental study. Political Communication, 13, 309-327.
74. Portillos, E. L. (1998). Latinos and Latinas: Latinos, gangs, and drugs. In C. R. Mann & M. S. Zatz (Eds.), Images of color, images of crime (pp. 156-165). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
75. Rodriguez, S. F., Curry, T., & Lee, G. (2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87, 318-339.
76. Sarat, A. (1993). Research on the death penalty: Speaking of death: Narratives of violence in capital trials. Law & Society Review, 27, 19-58.
77. Schur, E. M. (1971). Labeling deviant behavior. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
78. Schur, E. M. (1983). Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma, and social control. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
79. Smart, C. (1977). Women, crime, and criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
80. Smith, T. W. (1990). Ethnic Images. Retrieved January 28, 2008, from http://cloud9.norc.uchicago.edu/dlib/t-19.htm
81. Spohn, C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially-neutral sentencing process. J. Horney, Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system, (Vol. 3, pp. 427-501). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
82. Spohn, C. (2005). Sentencing decisions in three U.S. district courts: Testing the assumption of uniformity in the federal sentencing process. Justice Research & Policy, 7, 1-27.
83. Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. (2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.
84. Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
85. Spohn, C., & Spears, J. W. (1997). Gender and case processing decisions: A comparison of case outcomes for male and female defendants charged with violent felonies. Women & Criminal Justice, 8, 29-59.
86. Spohn, C., Welch, S., & Gruhl, J. (1985). Women defendants in court: The interaction between sex and race in convicting and sentencing. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 178-198.
87. Stacey, A. M., & Spohn, C. (2006). Gender and the social costs of sentencing: An analysis of sentences imposed on male and female offenders in three U.S. district courts. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 11, 43-76.
88. Steen, S., Engen, R. L., & Gainey, R. R. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435-468.
89. Steffensmeier, D. (1980). Assessing the impact of the woman’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime and Delinquency, 26, 344-357.
90. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65, 705-729.
91. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges’ sentencing decisions: Hispanic-black-white comparisons. Criminology, 39, 145-178.
92. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261.
93. Steffensmeier, D., & Kramer, J. (1980). The differential impact of criminal stigmatization on male and female felons. Sex Roles, 6, 1-16.
94. Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446.
95. Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.
96. Stith, K., & Cabranes, J. A. (1998). Fear of judging: Sentencing guidelines in the federal courts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
97. Surette, R. (1992). Media, crime, and criminal justice: Images and realities. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
98. Tonry, M. H. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
99. Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-177.
100. U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2001). Federal sentencing guidelines manual. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
101. U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2003). Sourcebook of federal sentencing statistics. Washington, DC: United States Sentencing Commission.
102. U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2004). Fifteen years of guidelines sentencing: An assessment of how well the federal criminal justice system is achieving the goals of sentencing reform. Washington, DC: United States Sentencing Commission.
103. Visher, C. A. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry. Criminology, 21, 5-28.
104. Weisselberg, C. D. & Dunworth, T. (1993). Inter-district variation under the guidelines: The trees may be more significant than the forest. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 6, 25-28.
105. Wheeler, S., Mann, K., & Sarat, A. (1988). Sitting in Judgment: The Sentencing of White-Collar Criminals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
106. Young, V. D. (1986). Gender expectations and their impact on black female offenders and victims. Justice Quarterly, 3, 305-327.