Learning from Non-Linear Ecosystem Dynamics Is Vital for Achieving Land Degradation Neutrality

Land Degradation and Development

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 2308-2314

  Sietz, Diana ^a   Fleskens, Luuk ^a,b   Stringer, Lindsay C ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cost benefit; ecosystem regime; sustainable land management; timing; window of opportunity and risk

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DYNAMICS; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; LAND USE; RESTORATION;

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION; COST BENEFITS; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS; FINANCIAL VIABILITY; LAND DEGRADATION; SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENTS; TIMING;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; LAND DEGRADATION; LAND MANAGEMENT; LEARNING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85019162032     PISSN: 10853278     EISSN: 1099145X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2732     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Akhtar-Schuster M, Stringer LC, Erlewein A, Metternicht G, Minelli S, Safriel U, Sommer S. 2017. Unpacking the concept of land degradation neutrality and addressing its operation through the Rio conventions. Journal of Environmental Management 195: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.044.
2. Baptista I, Irvine B, Fleskens L, Geissen V, Ritsema C. 2016. Modelling the biophysical impact and financial viability of soil management technologies under variable climate in Cabo Verde drylands: the PESERA-DESMICE approach. Land Degradation and Development 27: 1679–1690. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2552.
3. Barkemeyer R, Stringer LC, Hollins JA, Josephi F. 2015. Corporate reporting on solutions to wicked problems: sustainable land management in the mining sector. Environmental Science & Policy 48: 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.021.
4. Bestelmeyer BT. 2006. Threshold concepts and their use in rangeland management and restoration: the good, the bad, and the insidious. Restoration Ecology 14: 325–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00140.x.
5. Broadhurst LM, Jones TA, Smith FS, North T, Guja L. 2016. Maximizing seed resources for restoration in an uncertain future. Bioscience 66: 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv155.
6. Chasek P, Safriel U, Shikongo S, Fuhrman VF. 2015. Operationalizing zero net land degradation: the next stage in international efforts to combat desertification? Journal of Arid Environments 112: 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.020.
7. De Groot RA, Blignaut J, Van Der Ploeg S, Aronson J, Elmqvist T, Farley J. 2013. Benefits of investing in ecosystem restoration. Conservation Biology 27: 1286–1293. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12158.
8. Diffenbaugh N, Field CB. 2013. Changes in ecologically critical terrestrial climate conditions. Science 341: 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237123.
9. ELD Initiative. 2015. The value of land: Prosperous lands and positive rewards through sustainable land management. Available from www.eld-initiative.org.
10. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS. 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 557–581. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711.
11. Foster CN, Sato CF, Lindenmayer DB, Barton PS. 2016. Integrating theory into disturbance interaction experiments to better inform ecosystem management. Global Change Biology 22: 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13155.
12. Friedel MH. 1991. Range condition assessment and the concept of thresholds: a viewpoint. Journal of Range Management 44: 422–426.
13. Giger M, Liniger H, Sauter C, Schwilch G. 2015. Economic benefits and costs of sustainable land management technologies: an analysis of WOCAT's global data. Land Degradation & Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2429.
14. Gilardelli F, Sgorbati S, Citterio S, Gentili R. 2016. Restoring limestone quarries: hayseed, commercial seed mixture or spontaneous succession? Land Degradation & Development 27: 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2244.
15. Hill J, Stellmes M, Udelhoven T, Röder A, Sommer S. 2008. Mediterranean desertification and land degradation: mapping related land use change syndromes based on satellite observations. Global and Planetary Change 64: 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.10.005.
16. Hirota M, Holmgren M, Van Nes EH, Scheffer M. 2011. Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions. Science 334: 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210657.
17. Hobbs RJ, Higgs ES, Hall C. 2013. Novel ecosystems: intervening in the new ecological world order. John Wiley: Oxford, UK.
18. Holling CS. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 4: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
19. Holmgren M, Hirota M, Van Nes EH, Scheffer M. 2013. Effects of interannual climate variability on tropical tree cover. Nature Climate Change 3: 755–758. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1906.
20. Holmgren M, Scheffer M. 2001. El Niño as a window of opportunity for the restoration of degraded arid ecosystems. Ecosystems 4: 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100210000065.
21. James JJ, Gornish ES, DiTomaso JM, Davy J, Doran MP, Bechetti T, Lile D, Brownsey P, Laca EA. 2015. Managing Medusahead (Taeniatherumcaput-medusae) on rangeland: a meta-analysis of control effects and assessment of stakeholder needs. Rangeland Ecology & Management 68: 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2015.03.006.
22. Kok M, Lüdeke MKB, Lucas P, Sterzel T, Walther C, Janssen P, Sietz D, De Soysa I. 2016. A new method for analysing socio-ecological patterns of vulnerability. Regional Environmental Change 16: 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0746-1.
23. Malhi Y, Roberts JT, Betts RA, Killeen TJ, Li W, Nobre CA. 2008. Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319: 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146961.
24. Nilsson C, Polvi LE, Gardeström J, Hasselquist EM, Lind L, Sarneel JM. 2015. Riparian and in-stream restoration of boreal streams and rivers: success or failure? Ecohydrology 8: 753–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1480.
25. Nkonya E, Anderson W, Kato E, Koo J, Mirzabaev A, von Braun J, Meyer S. 2016. Global cost of land degradation. In Economics of land degradation and improvement – a global assessment for sustainable development, Nkonya E, Mirzabaev A, von Braun J (eds). International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA, Center for Development Research, University of Bonn: Germany, Ch. 6; 117–165.
26. Orr BJ, Cowie AL, Castillo Sanchez VM, Chasek P, Crossman ND, Erlewein A, Louwagie G, Maron M, Metternicht GI, Minelli S, Tengberg AE, Walter S, Welton S. 2017. Scientific conceptual framework for land degradation neutrality. A Report of the Science-Policy Interface. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn, Germany.
27. Qadir M, Quillérou E, Nangia V, Murtaza G, Singh M, Thomas RJ, Drechsel P, Noble AD. 2014. Economics of salt-induced land degradation and restoration. Natural Resources Forum 38: 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12054.
28. Reed MS, Stringer LC. 2016. Land degradation, desertification and climate change: anticipating, assessing and adapting to future change. Routledge: Oxon, UK.
29. Reed MS, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Perkins JS, Atlhopheng JR, Mulale K, Favretto N. 2015. Reorienting land degradation towards sustainable land management: linking sustainable livelihoods with ecosystem services in rangeland systems. Journal of Environmental Management 151: 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.010.
30. Roques KG, O'Connor TG, Watkinson AR. 2001. Dynamics of shrub encroachment in an African savanna: relative influences of fire, herbivory, rainfall and density dependence. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00069-X.
31. Scheffer M, Barrett S, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Green AJ, Holmgren M, Hughes TP, Kosten S, van de Leemput IA, Nepstad DC, van Nes EH, Peeters ETHM, Walker B. 2015. Creating a safe operating space for iconic ecosystems. Science 347: 1317–1319. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa3769.
32. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B. 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413: 591–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/35098000.
33. Scheffer M, Carpenter S. 2003. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 648–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.002.
34. Sietz D, Van Dijk H. 2015. Land-based adaptation to global change: what drives soil and water conservation in western Africa? Global Environmental Change 33: 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.001.
35. Sietz D. 2014. Regionalisation of global insights into dryland vulnerability: better reflecting smallholders' vulnerability in Northeast Brazil. Global Environmental Change 25: 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.010.
36. Sitters J, Holmgren M, Stoorvogel JJ, López BC. 2012. Rainfall-tuned management facilitates dry forest recovery. Restoration Ecology 20: 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00761.x.
37. Staal A, Dekker SC, Hirota M, Van Nes EH. 2015. Synergistic effects of drought and deforestation on the resilience of the south-eastern Amazon rainforest. Ecological Complexity 22: 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2015.01.003.
38. Stavi I, Lal R. 2015. Achieving zero net land degradation: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Arid Environments 112: 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.01.016.
39. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S. 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347: 6223. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.
40. Suding KN, Hobbs RJ. 2009. Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.012.
41. Suding KN. 2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42: 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145115.
42. Tarrason D, Ravera F, Reed MS, Dougill AJ, Gonzalez L. 2016. Land degradation assessment through an ecosystem services lens: integrating knowledge and methods in pastoral semi-arid systems. Journal of Arid Environments 124: 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.08.002.
43. UNCCD. 2016. Land in balance. The scientific conceptual framework for land degradation neutrality (LDN). Science-Policy Brief 02. September 2016, United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Science-Policy Interface, Bonn, Germany.
44. UNCCD. 2015. Report of the conference of the parties on its twelfth session. Addendum (ICCD/COP(12)/20/Add.1). Online [accessed 7 February 2016]: http://www.unccd.int/Lists/OfficialDocuments/cop12/20add1eng.pdf
45. Valone TJ, Meyer M, Brown JH, Chew RM. 2002. Timescale of perennial grass recovery in desertified arid grasslands following livestock removal. Conservation Biology 16: 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01045.x.
46. Westoby M, Walker B, Noy-Meir I. 1989. Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal of Range Management 42: 266–274.
47. Wilson KA, Lulow M, Burger J, Fang YC, Andersen C, Olson D, O'Connell M, McBride MF. 2011. Optimal restoration: accounting for space, time and uncertainty. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01975.
48. Zahawi RA, Reid RL, Holl KD. 2014. Hidden costs of passive restoration. Restoration Ecology 22: 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12098.