Ten-year performance of the United States national elm trial

Arboriculture and Urban Forestry

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 107-120

  Griffin, Jason J ^a   Jacobi, William R ^b   McPherson, E Gregory ^c   Sadof, Clifford S ^d   McKenna, James R ^e   Gleason, Mark L ^f   Gauthier, Nicole Ward ^g   Potter, Daniel A ^h   Smitley, David R ⁱ   Adams, Gerard C ^j   Gould, Ann Brooks ^k   Cash, Christian R ^l   Walla, James A ^m   Starrett, Mark C ⁿ   Chastagner, Gary ^o   Sibley, Jeff L ^p   Krischik, Vera A ^q   Newby, Adam F ^p  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^c PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^f IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

ⁱ MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^k RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources   (United States)

^m Northern Tree Specialties   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^o WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Chalkbark elm; Japanese elm; Lacebark elm; Scotch elm; Siberian elm; Smoothleaf elm; Tree evaluation; Ulmus carpinifolia; Ulmus glabra; Ulmus japonica; Ulmus parvifolia; Ulmus propinqua; Ulmus pumila; Ulmus wilsoniana; Urban forestry; Wilson elm.

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; COMMUNITY FORESTRY; CULTIVAR; DISEASE; GROWTH; PATHOGEN; SURVIVAL; TREE; URBAN FORESTRY;

COLORADO; UNITED STATES;

HEMIPTERA; HEXAPODA; ULMUS; ULMUS AMERICANA; ULMUS GLABRA; ULMUS JAPONICA; ULMUS PARVIFOLIA; ULMUS PROCERA; ULMUS PROPINQUA; ULMUS PUMILA; ULMUS WILSONIANA;

EID: 85019148141     PISSN: 19355297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. American Horticultural Society (AHS). 2017. AHS Plant Heat Zone Map. Accessed 10 May 2016. http://ahsgardening.org/gardening-resources/gardening-maps/heat-zone-m.
2. Colorado State University (CSU). 2017. National Elm Trial. http:bspm.agsci.colostate.edu/national-elm-trial.
3. Condra, J.M., C.M. Brady, and D.A. Potter. 2010. Resistance of landscape-suitable elms to Japanese beetle, gall aphids, and leaf miners, with notes on life history of Orchestes alni and Agromyza aristata in Kentucky. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36:101-109.
4. Costello, L.R., S.R. Scott, and C.M. Drake. 2004. A 10-year evaluation of the performance of four elm cultivars in California, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 30(2):114-122.
5. Dirr, M.A. 2009. Manual of Woody Landscape Plants: Their Identification, Ornamental Characteristics, Culture, Propagation and Uses, sixth edition. Stipes Publishing, Champaign, Illinois, U.S. 1164 pp.
6. Gerhold, H.D., W.N. Wandell, and N.L. Lacasse (Eds.). 1993. Street Tree Factsheets. The Pennsylvania State University.
7. Harlow, W.M., E.S. Harrar, J.W. Hardin, and F.M. White. 1991. Textbook of Dendrology: Covering the Important Forest Trees of the United States and Canada, seventh edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, U.S. 240 pp.
8. Karnosky, D.F. 1982. Double jeopardy for elms: Dutch elm disease and phloem necrosis. Arnoldia 42(2):70-77.
9. Lanier, G.N. 1981. Behavior-modifying chemicals in Dutch elm disease vector control. pp. 371-394. In: Proceedings of the Dutch Elm Disease Symposium and Workshop, 5-9 October 1981, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Manitoba Department of Natural Resources, Forest Protection and Dutch Elm Disease Branch, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
10. Martin, D. 2012. Pest alert: Elm yellows. USDA Forest Service. Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry.
11. McPherson, G., L. Costello, J. Harding, S. Dreistadt, M.L. Flint, and S. Mezger. 2009. National Elm Trial: Initial report from northern California. Western Arborist. pp. 32-36.
12. Mittempergher, L., and A. Santini. 2004. The history of elm breeding. Investigacion Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13(1):161-177.
13. NOAA. 2017. NOAA Regional Climate Centers. http://xmacis.rcc-acis.org.
14. Peacock, J.W. 1981. Citywide mass trapping of Scolytus multistriatus. pp. 406-426. In: Proceedings of the Dutch Elm Disease Symposium and Workshop, 5-9 October 1981, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Manitoba Department of Natural Resources, Forest Protection and Dutch Elm Disease Branch, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
15. Plotnik, A. 2000. The Urban Tree Book: An Uncommon Field Guide for City and Town. Three Rivers Press, New York, New York, U.S. 54 pp.
16. Potter, D.A., and C.T. Redmond. 2013. Relative resistance or susceptibility of landscape-suitable elms (Ulmus spp.) to multiple insect pests. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 39:236-243.
17. Riffle, J.W., and G.W. Peterson (tech. coords.). 1986. Diseases of trees in the Great Plains. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-129. Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 96 pp.
18. Santamour, F.S., and S.E. Bentz. 1995. Updated checklist of elm (Ulmus) cultivars for use in North America. Journal of Arboriculture 21(3):122-131.
19. Sinclair, W.A., and H.H. Lyon. 2005. Diseases of Trees and Shrubs, second edition. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, U.S. 396 pp.
20. Slavicek, J.M., and K.S. Knight. 2011. Generation of American elm trees with tolerance to Dutch elm disease through controlled crosses and selection. pp. 342-346. In: R.A. Sniezko, A.D. Yanchuk, J.T. Kliejunas, K.M. Palmieri, J.M. Alexander, and S.J. Frankel (tech coord.). Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Genetics of Host-Parasite Interactions in Forestry: Disease and Insect Resistance in Forest Trees.
21. Smalley, E.B., and R.P. Guries. 1993. Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31:325-352.
22. Stipes, R.J., and R.J. Campana (Eds.). 1981. Compendium of Elm Diseases. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, U.S. 96 pp.
23. The Morton Arboretum. 2015. Elm cultivars checklist. Accessed 02 December 2015. http://systematics.mortonarb.org/ulmus.
24. Townsend, A.M. 2000. USDA genetic research on elms. pp. 271- 278. In: The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. C.P. Dunn (Ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, U.S.
25. Townsend, A.M., and L.W. Douglass. 2001. Variation among American elm clones in long-term dieback, growth, and survival following Ophiostoma inoculation. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 19(2):100-103.
26. Townsend, A.M., and L.W. Douglass. 2004. Evaluation of elm clones for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. Journal of Arboriculture 30(3):179-184.
27. Townsend, A.M., and L.R. Schreiber. 1975. Recent progress in the breeding and selection of elms. Proceedings of the Central States Tree Improvement Conference 9:1-6.
28. Townsend, A.M., S.E. Bentz, and L.W. Douglass. 2005. Evaluation of 19 American elm clones for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 23(1):21-24.
29. Townsend, A.M., S.E. Bentz, and G.R. Johnson. 1995. Variation in response of selected American elm clones to Ophiostoma ulmi. Journal of Environmental Horticulture. 13(3):126-128.
30. USDA. 2012. Plant Hardiness Zone Map. Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://planthardiness.ars.usda.gov.
31. Vega, F.E., and M. Blackwell (Eds.). 2005. Insect-Fungal Associations: Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, U.S. 352 pp.
32. Webber, J.F., and J.N. Gibbs. 1989. Insect dissemination of fungal plant pathogens of trees. pp. 161-193. In: N. Wilding, NM. Collins, P.M. Hammond, and J.F. Webber. Insect-Fungus Interactions. Academic Press, London, UK.