One step at a time: Stage-wise analysis of a series of experiments

Agronomy Journal

Volumn 109, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 845-857

  Damesa, Tigist Mideksa ^a   Möhring, Jens ^a   Worku, Mosisa ^b   Piepho, Hans Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Kenya)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019024543     PISSN: 00021962     EISSN: 14350645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2016.07.0395     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Atlin, G.N., R.J. Baker, K.B. McRae, and X. Lu. 2000. Selection response in subdivided target regions. Crop Sci. 40:7–13. doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.4017
2. Caliński, T., S. Czajka, Z. Kaczmarek, P. Krajewski, and W. Pilarczyk. 2005. Analyzing multi-environment variety trials using randomization-derived mixed models. Biometrics 61:448–455. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00334.x
3. Cochran, W.G. 1937. Problems arising in the analysis of a series of similar experiments. J.R. Stat. Soc. 4:102–118.
4. Comstock, R.E., and R.H. Moll. 1963. Genotype-environment interaction. In: W.D. Hanson and H.F. Robinson, editors, Statistical genetics and plant breeding. NAD-NRC Publ. No. 912. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Washington, DC. p. 164–198.
5. Gauch, H.G. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
6. George, A.W., and C. Cavanagh. 2015. Genome-wide association mapping in plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128:1163–1174. doi:10.1007/s00122-015-2497-x
7. James, W., and C. Stein. 1960. Estimation with quadratic loss. In: Proc. Fourth Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Probability. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. p. 361–380.
8. Kleinknecht, K., J. Möhring, K.P. Singh, P.H. Zaidi, G.N. Atlin, and H.P. Piepho. 2013. Comparison of the performance of BLUE and BLUP for zoned Indian maize data. Crop Sci. 53:1384–1391. doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.02.0073
9. Lee, Y., J.A. Nelder, and Y. Pawitan. 2006. Generalized linear models with random effects: Unified analysis via H-likelihood. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL. doi:10.1201/9781420011340
10. Madden, L.V., H.P. Piepho, and P.A. Paul. 2016. Statistical models and methods for network meta-analysis. Phytopathology 106:792– 806. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-12-15-0342-RVW
11. McLean, R.A., W.L. Sanders, and W.W. Stroup. 1991. A unified approach to mixed linear models. Am. Stat. 45:54–64.
12. Meuwissen, T.H.E., B.J. Hayes, and M.E. Goddard. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829.
13. Möhring, J., and H.P. Piepho. 2009. Comparison of weighting in two-stage analyses of plant breeding trials. Crop Sci. 49:1977–1988. doi:10.2135/cropsci2009.02.0083
14. Piepho, H.P. 1997. Analyzing genotype-environment data by mixed models with multiplicative effects. Biometrics 53:761–766. doi:10.2307/2533976
15. Piepho, H.P., and T. Eckl. 2014. Analysis of series of variety trials with perennial grasses. Grass Forage Sci. 69:431–440. doi:10.1111/gfs.12054
16. Piepho, H.P., and J. Möhring. 2005. Best linear unbiased prediction for subdivided target regions. Crop Sci. 45:1151–1159. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0398
17. Piepho, H.P., J. Möhring, T. Schulz-Streeck, and J.O. Ogutu. 2012a. A stage-wise approach for analysis of multi-environment trials. Biometrics 54:844–860. doi:10.1002/bimj.201100219
18. Piepho, H.P., J. Möhring, M. Pflugfelder, W. Hermann, and E.R. Williams. 2015. Problems in parameter estimation for power and AR(1) models of spatial correlation in designed field experiments. Comm. Biomet. Crop Sci. 10:3–16.
19. Piepho, H.P., M.F. Nazir, M. Qamar, A. Rattu, Riaz-ud-Din, M. Hussain, G. Ahmad, Fazal-e-Subhan, J. Ahmed, Abdullah, K.B. Laghari, I.A. Vistro, M.S. Kakar, M.A. Sial, and M. Imtiaz. 2016. Stability analysis for a country-wide series of wheat trials in Pakistan. Crop Sci. 56:2465–2475.
20. Piepho, H.P., J.O. Ogutu, T. Schulz-Streeck, B. Estaghvirou, A. Gordillo, and F. Technow. 2012b. Efficient computation of ridge-regression BLUP in genomic selection in plant breeding. Crop Sci. 52:1093–1104. doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.11.0592
21. Piepho, H.P., E.R. Williams, and L.V. Madden. 2012c. The use of two-way mixed models in multi-treatment meta-analysis. Biometrics 68:1269–1277. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01786.x
22. Robinson, G.K. 1991. That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. Stat. Sci. 6:15–32. doi:10.1214/ss/1177011926
23. Schulz-Streeck, T., J.O. Ogutu, and H.P. Piepho. 2013. Comparisons of single-stage and two-stage approaches to genomic selection using ridge regression BLUP and component wise boosting. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126:69–82. doi:10.1007/s00122-012-1960-1
24. Searle, S.R., G. Casella, and C.E. McCulloch. 1992. Variance components. John Wiley & Sons, New York. doi:10.1002/9780470316856
25. Smith, A.B., B.R. Cullis, and A. Gilmour. 2001. The analysis of crop variety evaluation data in Australia. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 43:129– 145. doi:10.1111/1467-842X.00163
26. Smith, A.B., B.R. Cullis, and R. Thompson. 2005. The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: An overview of current mixed model approaches. J. Agric. Sci. 143:449–462. doi:10.1017/S0021859605005587
27. So, Y.S., and J. Edwards. 2011. Predictive ability assessment of linear mixed models in multienvironment trials in corn. Crop Sci. 51:542–552. doi:10.2135/cropsci2010.06.0338
28. Stroup, W.W. 2015. Rethinking the analysis of non-normal data in plant and soil science. Agron. J. 107:811–827. doi:10.2134/agronj2013.0342
29. Talbot, M. 1997. Resource allocation for selection systems. In: R.A. Kempton and P.N. Fox, editors, Statistical methods for plant variety evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London, UK. p. 162–174. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1503-9_10
30. Vargas, M., E. Combs, G. Alvarado, G. Atlin, K. Mathews, and J. Crossa. 2013. META: A suite of SAS programs to analyze multienvironment breeding trials. Agron. J. 105:11–19. doi:10.2134/agronj2012.0016
31. Welham, S., B.J. Gogel, A.B. Smith, R. Thompson, and B.R. Cullis. 2010. A comparison of analysis methods for late-stage evaluation trials. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 52:125–149. doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.2010.00570.x
32. Whitehead, A. 2002. Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. John Wiley & Sons, New York. doi:10.1002/0470854200
33. Worku, M., L. Wolde, B. Tadesse, D. Girma, A. Girum, W. Abera, et al. 2012. Status and future direction of maize research and production in Ethiopia. In: M. Worku, S. Twumasi-Afriyie, L. Wolde, B. Tadesse, G. Demisie, G. Bogale, et al., editors, Meeting the challenges of global climate change and food security through innovative maize research. Proceedings of the 3rd national maize workshop of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 17–20 Apr. 2011. The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Houston, TX. p. 17–23.
34. Yates, F., and W.G. Cochran. 1938. The analysis of groups of experiments. J. Agric. Sci. 28:556–580. doi:10.1017/S0021859600050978