Meta: A suite of sas programs to analyze multienvironment breeding trials

Agronomy Journal

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 11-19

  Vargas, Mateo ^a,b   Combs, Emily ^c   Alvarado, Gregorio ^b   Atlin, Gary ^b   Mathews, Ky ^b   Crossa, Jose ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA CHAPINGO   (Mexico)

^b INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYOMMATINAE;

EID: 84872959297     PISSN: 00021962     EISSN: 14350645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2012.0016     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Banziger, M., P.S. Setimela, D. Hodson, and B. Vivek. 2004. Breeding for improved drought tolerance in maize adapted to southern Africa. In: T. Fischer et al., editors, New directions for a diverse planet: Proceedings for the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia. 26 Sept.-1 Oct. 2004. Regional Inst., Gosford, NSW, Australia.
2. Bos, I. 2008. Selection methods in plant breeding. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
3. Campos, H., M. Cooper, J.E. Habben, G.O. Edmeades, and J.R. Schussler. 2004. Improving drought tolerance in maize: A view from industry. Field Crops Res. 90:19-34. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.003
4. Cooper, M., I.H. DeLacy, and K.E. Basford. 1996. Relationships among analytical methods used to analyze genotypic adaptation in multi-environment trials. In: M. Cooper and G.L. Hammer, editors, Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK. p. 193-224.
5. Holland, J.B. 2006. Estimating genotypic correlations and their standard errors using multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation with SAS Proc MIXED. Crop Sci. 46:642-654. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0191
6. McLean, R.A., W.L. Sanders, and W.W. Stroup. 1991. A unif ed approach to mixed linear models. Am. Stat. 45:54-64.
7. Oehlert, G.W. 2000. A first course in design and analysis of experiments. W.H. Freeman, New York.
8. Piepho, H., and J. Mohring. 2006. Selection in cultivar trials: Is it ignorable? Crop Sci. 46:192-201. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.04-0038
9. Shaw, R.G., and T. Mitchell-Olds. 1993. ANOVA for unbalanced data: An overview. Ecology 74:1638-1645. doi:10.2307/1939922
10. Smith, A.B., B.R. Cullis, and R. T ompson. 2005. The analysis of crop culti-var breeding and evaluation trials: An overview of current mixed model approaches. J. Agric. Sci. 143: 449-462. doi:10.1017/S 0021859605005587
11. Spilke, J., H.P. Piepho, and X. Hu. 2005. Analysis of unbalanced data by mixed linear models using the mixed procedure of the SAS system. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 191: 47-54. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037 X. 2004. 00120. x
12. Xu, Y. 2010. Molecular plant breeding. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK.