Organizing product innovation: Hierarchy, market or triple-helix networks?

Triple Helix

Volumn 1, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-21

  Fitjar, Rune Dahl ^a   Gjelsvik, Martin ^b   Rodríguez Pose, Andrés ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^b INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Firms; Markets; Networks; Norway; Organization; Outsourcing; Triple helix

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018973926     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21971927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Argyres N (1996) Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strateg Manag J 17(2):129–150
2. Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2007) The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. J Manag Stud 44:1242–1254
3. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120
4. Barney JB, Ouchi WG (1986) Organizational Economics. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
5. Barzel Y (1981) Competitive tying arrangements: the case of medical insurance. Econ Inq 19(4):598–613
6. Bathelt H, Turi P (2011) Local, global and virtual buzz: the importance of face-to-face contact in economic interaction and possibilities to go beyond. Geoforum 42(5):520–529
7. Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28(1):31–56
8. Baum JAC, Oliver C (1991) Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Adm Sci Q 36:187–218
9. Beaverstock JV, Derudder B, Faulconbridge JR, Witlox F (2009) International business travel: some explorations. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 91(3):193–202
10. Boschma RA (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39(1):61–74
11. Burgelman RA (2002) Strategy is destiny. The Free Press, New York
12. Burt RS (1992) Structural holes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
13. Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol 110:349–349
14. Chesbrough H (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
15. Coase R (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4:386–405
16. Cohen W, Nelson RR, Walsh J (1997) Appropriability conditions and why firms patent and why they do not in the American manufacturing sector. Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh
17. Conner KR (1991) A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm? J Manag 17:121–154
18. Conner KR, Prahalad CK (1996) A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organ Sci 7 (5):477–501
19. Dodgson M (2014) Collaboration and innovation management. In: Dodgson M, Gann DM, Phillips N (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford University Press, Oxford
20. Dosi G, Kogut B (1992) National specificities and the context of change: the coevolution of organization and technology. In: Kogut B (ed) Country competitiveness: technology and the organization of work. Oxford University Press, New York
21. Duranton G, Puga D (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4, Vol. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2063–2117
22. Etzkowitz H (2003) Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Soc Sci Inf 42:293–337
23. Etzkowitz H (2008) The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. Routledge, New York
24. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Res Policy 29:109–123
25. Fitjar RD, Rodríguez-Pose A (2011) When local interaction does not suffice: sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environ Planning A 43:1248–1267
26. Fitjar RD, Rodríguez-Pose A (2013) Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Res Policy 42(1):128–138
27. Foss NJ (1996) Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: some critical comments. Organ Sci 7(5):470–476
28. Foss NJ, Laursen K, Pedersen T (2011) Linking customer interaction and innovation: the mediating role of new organizational practices. Organ Sci 22:980–999
29. Gertler MS (2003) Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or, the undefinable tacitness of being (there). J Econ Geogr 3:75–99
30. Glaeser E (2011) Triumph of the city: how our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier and happier. Macmillan, New York
31. Gordon IR, McCann P (2000) Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Stud 37:513–532
32. Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510
33. Granovetter M (1992) Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis. Acta Sociologica 35(1):3–11
34. Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. J Polit Econ 94(4):691–719
35. Gulati R, Lawrence PR, Puranam P (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: beyond incentive conflict. Strateg Manag J 26(5):415–441
36. Kakabadse N, Kakabadse A (2000) Critical review—outsourcing: a paradigm shift. J Manage Dev 19(8):670–728
37. Kogut B, Zander UB (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3:383–397
38. Kogut B, Zander UB (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ Sci 7(5):502–518
39. Langlois RN (1992) Transaction-cost economics in real time. Ind Corp Chang 1(1):99–127
40. Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strateg Manag J 27(2):131–150
41. Leamer EE, Storper M (2001) The economic geography of the internet age. J Int Bus Stud 32(4):641–665
42. Leknes E (2010) Fremveksten av byregioner i Norge. In: Farsund AA, Leknes E (eds) Norske byregioner: utviklingstrekk og styringsutfordringer. Høyskoleforlaget, Kristiansand, pp 55–93
43. Leydesdorff L (2000) The Triple Helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Res Policy 29:243–255
44. Leydesdorff L (2012) The Triple-Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-tuple of Helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? J Knowledge Econ 3(1):25–35
45. Leydesdorff L, Fritsch M (2006) Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics. Res Policy 35:1538–1553
46. Leydesdorff L, Mayer M (2006) Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: introduction to the special issue. Res Policy 35:1441–1449
47. Leydesdorff L, Dolfsma W, van der Panne G (2006) Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of Triple Helix relations among technology, organization, and territory. Res Policy 35:181–199
48. Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1988) First-mover advantages. Strateg Manag J 9(S1):41–58
49. Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1998) First-mover (dis)advantages: retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strateg Manag J 19:1111–1125
50. Macneil IR (1980) The new social contract: an inquiry into modern contractual relations. Yale University Press, New Haven
51. Maskell P, Bathelt H, Malmberg A (2006) Building global knowledge pipelines: the role of temporary clusters. Eur Plan Stud 14(8):997–1013
52. Moodysson J (2008) Principles and practices of knowledge creation: on the organization of "buzz" and "pipelines" in life science communities. Econ Geogr 84(4):449–469
53. Morrison A, Rabellotti R, Zirulia L (2013) When do global pipelines enhance the diffusion of knowledge in clusters? Econ Geogr 89(1):77–96
54. Nickerson J, Zenger T (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm: the problem-solving perspective. Organ Sci 15:617–632
55. Osborn RN, Hagedoorn J (1997) The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of interorganizational alliances and networks. Acad Manag J 40:261–278
56. Peteraf M, Helfat CE (2003) The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strateg Manag J 24(10):997
57. Polanyi K (1944) The great transformation. Rinehart, New York
58. Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. The Free Press, New York
59. Porter ME (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harv Bus Rev 76(6):77–90
60. Powell WW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res Organ Behav 12:295–336
61. Quinn JB, Hilmer FG (1994) Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Manage Rev 35(4):43–55
62. Ranga M, Etzkowitz H (2013) Triple helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Ind High Educ 27(4):237–262
63. Roper S, Du J, Love JH (2008) Modeling the innovation value chain. Res Policy 37:961–977
64. Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
65. Shenkar O (2010) Copycats: how smart companies use imitation to gain a strategic edge. Harvard Business Press, Boston
66. Stogdill R (1959) Individual behavior and group achievement. Oxford University Press, New York
67. Storper M, Venables AJ (2004) Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. J Econ Geogr 4(4):351–370
68. Strand Ø, Leydesdorff L (2013) Where is synergy indicated in the Norwegian innovation system? Triple-Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80(3):471–484
69. Tapscott D, Williams AD (2006) Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything. Portfolio, New York
70. Teece DJ (2000) Managing intellectual capital. Oxford University Press, Oxford
71. Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28(13):1319–1350
72. Teece DJ (2009) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Oxford University Press, Oxford
73. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533
74. Tidd J, Bessant J (2009) Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change, 4th edn. Wiley, Chichester
75. Torre A (2008) On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Reg Stud 42 (6):869–889
76. Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am Sociol Rev 61(4):674–698
77. Von Hippel E (1988) The sources of innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge
78. Williamson O (1973) Markets and hierarchies: some elementary considerations. Am Econ Rev 63(2):316–325
79. Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. The Free Press, New York
80. Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Adm Sci Q 36:269–296