Applying the CACAO change model to promote systemic transformation in STEM

Transforming Institutions: Undergraduate STEM Education for the 21st Century

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 176-188

  Marker, Anthony ^a   Pyke, Patricia ^a   Ritter, Sarah ^a   Viskupic, Karen ^a   Moll, Amy ^a,b   Eric Landrum, R ^a   Roark, Tony ^a   Shadle, Susan ^a  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Boise State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018812660     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT). (2014). Workshop for new physics and astronomy faculty. College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aapt.org/Conferences/new faculty/nfw.cfm
2. Beach, A. L., Henderson, C., Walter, E. M. & Williams, C. (n.d.). Postsecondary instructional practices survey (NSF #1256505). Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.
3. Brownell, S. E. & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and… tensions with professional identity? CBELife Sciences Education, 11, 339-346.
4. Cottrell Scholars Collaborative (CSC). (2014). CSC New faculty workshop. Retrieved from http://chem.wayne.edu/feiggroup/CSCNFW/cottrell-scholars -collabora.html
5. Dormant, D. (2011). The chocolate model of change. San Bernadino, CA: Author.
6. Gilbert, T. F. (1978). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
7. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 3, 020102-1-020102-14.
8. Kezar, A. (2011). What is the best way to achieve broader reach of improved practices in higher education? Innovative Higher Education, 36, 235-247.
9. Kotter, J. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York, NY: Free Press.
10. McKenna, A.F., Froyd, J., & Litzinger, T. (2014). The complexities of transforming engineering higher education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103, 188-192.
11. Murray, T.A., Higgins, P., Minderhout, V., & Loertscher, J. (2011). Sustaining the development and implementation of student-centered teaching nationally: The importance of a community of practice. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 39, 405-411.
12. National Association of Geoscience Teachers (NAGT). (2015). On the cutting edge: Strong undergraduate geoscience teaching. Retrieved from http://serc.carleton. edu/NAGTWorkshops/index.html
13. National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving undergraduate learning in science and engineering. Washington, DC: Author.
14. National Science Foundation. (2013). Widening implementation and demonstration of evidence-based reforms (WIDER). Program Solicitation #NSF-13-552. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf 13552/nsf13552.htm
15. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
16. Walczyk, J. J., Ramsey, L. L. & Zha, P. (2007). Obstacles to instructional innovation according to college science and mathematics faculty. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 85-106. doi: 10.1002/tea.20119