Missing in (Collective) Action: Ideology, System Justification, and the Motivational Antecedents of Two Types of Protest Behavior

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 99-108

  Jost, John T ^a   Becker, Julia ^b   Osborne, Danny ^c   Badaan, Vivienne ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

collective action; ideology; moral outrage; protest; system justification

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018773167     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721417690633     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Becker J. C., Wright S. C., (2011). (See References). Studies demonstrating that women who are exposed to benevolent sexism decrease their support for collective action for greater gender equality because they perceive the gender system as more justified and see certain advantages of being a woman.
2. Jost J. T., Chaikalis-Petritsis V., Abrams D., Sidanius J., van der Toorn J., Bratt C., (2012). (See References). A combination of survey and experimental studies indicating that system-justification motivation undermines people’s willingness to protest by dampening the experience of group-based anger, even among political activists.
3. Jost J. T., Gaucher D., Stern C., (2015). “The world isn’t fair”: A system justification perspective on social stratification and inequality. In Dovidio J. F., Simpson J. A., (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 317–340). Washington, DC: APA. A comprehensive review that addresses the maintenance of social inequality from a system-justification perspective.
4. Klandermans B., van Stekelenburg J., (2013). (See References). A summary of the social-psychological literature focusing on the dynamics of supply, demand, and mobilization within a framework that emphasizes group-based grievances, collective efficacy, politicized identity, emotions (especially anger), and embeddedness as psychological antecedents of collective action.
5. Osborne D., Sibley C. G., (2013). (See References). A large-scale, nationally representative survey in New Zealand revealing that at higher (vs. lower) levels of system justification, the effect of relative deprivation on subjective well-being and support for collective action is attenuated.
6. Becker J. C., Wright S. C., (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62–77.
7. Berger P. L., Luckmann T., (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
8. Cichocka A., Jost J. T., (2014). Stripped of illusions? Exploring system justification processes in capitalist and post-communist societies. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 6–29.
9. Crosby F. J., (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.
10. Diekman A. B., Goodfriend W., (2007). The good and bad of social change: Ambivalence toward activist groups. Social Justice Research, 20, 401–417.
11. Drury J., Reicher S. D., (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 707–726.
12. Durrheim K., Jacobs N., Dixon J., (2014). Explaining the paradoxical effects of intergroup contact: Paternalistic relations and system justification in domestic labour in South Africa. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 41, 150–164.
13. Eibach R. P., Wilmot M. O., Libby L. K., (2015). The system-justifying function of gratitude norms. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 348–358.
14. Gaucher D., Jost J. T., (2011). Difficulties awakening the sense of injustice and overcoming oppression: On the soporific effects of system justification. In Coleman P. T., (Ed.), Conflict, interdependence, and justice: The intellectual legacy of Morton Deutsch (pp. 227–246). New York, NY: Springer.
15. Górska P., Bilewicz M., (2015). When “a group in itself” becomes “a group for itself”: Overcoming inhibitory effects of superordinate categorization on LGBTQ individuals. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 554–575.
16. Gurr T., (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Hennes E. P., Nam H. H., Stern C., Jost J. T., (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30, 669–688.
18. Jost J. T., (2015). Resistance to change: A social psychological perspective. Social Research, 82, 607–636.
19. Jost J. T., Banaji M. R., Nosek B. A., (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–929.
20. Jost J. T., Burgess D., Mosso C., (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In Jost J. T., Major B., (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363–388). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21. Jost J. T., Chaikalis-Petritsis V., Abrams D., Sidanius J., van der Toorn J., Bratt C., (2012). Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 197–208.
22. Jost J. T., Glaser J., Kruglanski A. W., Sulloway F. J., (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
23. Jost J. T., Krochik M., (2014). Ideological differences in epistemic motivation: Implications for attitude structure, depth of information processing, susceptibility to persuasion, and stereotyping. In Elliot A., (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (pp. 181–231). San Diego, CA: Elsevier/Academic.
24. Jost J. T., Nosek B. A., Gosling S. D., (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136.
25. Jost J. T., van der Toorn J., (2012). System justification theory. In van Lange P. A. M., Kruglanski A. W., Higgins E. T., (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 313–343). London, England: Sage.
26. Jost J. T., Wakslak C., Tyler T. R., (2008). System justification theory and the alleviation of emotional distress: Palliative effects of ideology in an arbitrary social hierarchy and in society. In Hegtvedt K., Clay-Warner J., (Eds.), Justice: Advances in group processes (Vol. 25, pp. 181–211). Bingley, UK: JAI/Emerald.
27. Kawakami K., Dion K. L., (1995). Social identity and affect as determinants of collective action: Toward an integration of relative deprivation and social identity theories. Theory & Psychology, 5, 551–577.
28. Kinder D. R., Sears D. O., (1985). Public opinion and political action. In Lindzey G., Aronson E., (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 659–741). New York, NY: Random House.
29. Klandermans B., van Stekelenburg J., (2013). Social movements and the dynamics of collective action. In Huddy L., Sears D. O., Levy J. S., (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 774–811). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30. Kuran T., (1991). Now out of never: The element of surprise in the East European revolution of 1989. World Politics, 44, 7–48.
31. Leviston Z., Walker I., (2014, June). System legitimacy and support for climate change policy in Australia. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the International Society of Justice Research, New York, NY.
32. McGarty C., Thomas E. F., Lala G., Smith L. G., Bliuc A. M., (2014). New technologies, new identities, and the growth of mass opposition in the Arab Spring. Political Psychology, 35, 725–740.
33. Mills C. W., (1968). Letter to the new left. In Waxman C. I., (Ed.), The end of ideology debate (pp. 126–140). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1960)
34. O’Brien L. T., Crandall C. S., (2005). Perceiving self-interest: Power, ideology, and maintenance of the status quo. Social Justice Research, 18, 1–24.
35. Osborne D., Sibley C. G., (2013). Through rose-colored glasses: System-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 991–1004.
36. Osborne D., Smith H. J., Huo Y. J., (2012). More than a feeling: Discrete emotions mediate the relationship between relative deprivation and reactions to workplace furloughs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 628–641.
37. Rudman L. A., Moss-Racusin C. A., Phelan J. E., Nauts S., (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179.
38. Solak N., Jost J. T., Sümer N., Clore G. L., (2012). Rage against the machine: The case for system-level emotions. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 674–690.
39. Tajfel H., Turner J. C., (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin W. G., Worchel S., (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
40. Tausch N., Becker J., Spears R., Christ O., Saab R., Singh P., Siddiqui R. N., (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and non-normative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148.
41. Vainio A., Mäkiniemi J. P., Paloniemi R., (2014). System justification and the perception of food risks. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 509–523.
42. van Zomeren M., Leach C. W., Spears R., (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180–199.
43. van Zomeren M., Postmes T., Spears R., (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three social psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.
44. Wakslak C. J., Jost J. T., Tyler T. R., Chen E. S., (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274.
45. World Values Survey Association. (2016). World Values Survey Wave 6 2010–2014 official aggregate (v. 20150418). Madrid, Spain: Asep/JDS. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
46. Yeung A. W. Y., Kay A. C., Peach J. M., (2014). Anti-feminist backlash: The role of system justification in the rejection of feminism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 474–484.