Roadway classifications and the accident injury severities of heavy-vehicle drivers

Analytic Methods in Accident Research

Volumn 15, Issue , 2017, Pages 17-28

  Anderson, Jason ^a   Hernandez, Salvador ^a  

^a Oregon State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional class; Heavy vehicle; Heterogeneity; Injury severity; Mixed logit; Roadway classification

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FACTOR ANALYSIS; VEHICLES;

FUNCTIONAL CLASS; HEAVY VEHICLE; HETEROGENEITY; INJURY SEVERITY; MIXED LOGIT;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 85018751121     PISSN: 22136657     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amar.2017.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alvarez, R.M., Nagler, J., When politics and models collide: estimating models of multiparty elections. American Journal of Political Science 42:1 (1998), 55–96.
2. Anastasopoulos, P.C., Mannering, F.L., An empirical assessment of fixed and random parameter logit models using crash- and non-crash-specific injury data. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43:3 (2011), 1140–1147.
3. Behnood, A., Roshandeh, A.M., Mannering, F.L., Latent class analysis of the effects of age, gender and alcohol consumption on driver-injury severities. Analytic Methods in Accident Research 3–4 (2014), 56–91.
4. Blincoe, L., Miller, T.R., Zaloshnja, E., Lawrence, B.A., 2015. The Economical and Societal Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2010 (Revised May 2015).
5. Cerwick, D.M., Gkritza, K., Shaheed, M.S., Hans, Z., A comparison of the mixed logit and latent class methods for crash severity analysis. Analytic Methods in Accident Research 3–4 (2014), 11–27.
6. Eluru, N., Bagheri, M., Miranda-Moreno, L.F., Fu, L., A latent class modeling approach for identifying vehicle driver injury severity factors at highway-railway crossings. Accident Analysis and Prevention 47 (2012), 119–127.
7. Eluru, N., Bhat, C.R., A joint econometric analysis of seat belt use and crash-related injury severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39:5 (2007), 1037–1049.
8. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2013. Commercial Motor Vehicle Facts.
9. Geedipally, S.R., Turner, P.A., Patil, S., Analysis of motorcycle crashes in texas with multinomial logit model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2265 (2011), 62–69.
10. Gkritza, K., Mannering, F.L., Mixed logit analysis of safety-belt use in single- and multi-occupant vehicles. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40:2 (2008), 443–451.
11. Greene, W.H., Econometric Analysis. 7th ed., 2012, Pearson Education, New York, NY.
12. Greene, W.H., NLOGIT 5 Reference Guide. 2012, Econometric Software Inc, Plainview, NY.
13. Idaho Office of Highway Safety, 2014. Idaho Traffic Crashes.
14. Islam, M.Bin., Hernandez, S., Modeling injury outcomes of crashes involving heavy vehicles on texas highways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2388 (2013), 28–36.
15. Islam, M.Bin., Hernandez, S., Large truck-involved crashes: exploratory injury severity analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering 139:6 (2013), 596–604.
16. Islam, S., Jones, S.L., Dye, D., Comprehensive analysis of single and multi-vehicle large truck at-fault crashes on rural and urban roadways in alabama. Accident Analysis and Prevention 67 (2014), 148–158.
17. Kashani, A.T., Mohaymany, A.S., Analysis of the traffic injury severity on two-lane, two-way rural roads based on classification tree models. Safety Science 49:10 (2011), 1314–1320.
18. Khorashadi, A., Niemeier, D., Shankar, V., Mannering, F., Differences in rural and urban driver-injury severities in accidents involving large-trucks: an exploratory analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 37:5 (2005), 910–921.
19. Kim, J.K., Ulfarssom, G.F., Shankar, V.N., Mannering, F.L., A note on modeling pedestrian-injury severity in motor-vehicle crashes with the mixed logit model. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42:6 (2010), 1751–1758.
20. Kim, J.-K., Ulfarsson, G.F., Kim, S., Shankar, V.N., Driver-injury severity in single-vehicle crashes in california: a mixed logit analysis of heterogeneity due to age and gender. Accident Analysis and Prevention 50 (2013), 1073–1081.
21. Lemp, J.D., Kockelman, K.M., Unnikrishnan, A., Analysis of large truck crash severity using heteroskedastic ordered probit models. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43:1 (2011), 370–380.
22. Manepalli, U.R.R., Bham, G.H., Javvadi, B.S., Multinomial logistic regression model for single-vehicle and multivehicle collisions on urban U.S. highways in arkansas. Journal of Transportation Engineering 138:6 (2012), 786–797.
23. Mannering, F.L., Shankar, V., Bhat, C.R., Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data. Analytic Methods in Accident Research 11 (2016), 1–16.
24. McFadden, D., Train, K., Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15:5 (2000), 447–470.
25. Milton, J.C., Shankar, V.N., Mannering, F.L., Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: an exploratory empirical analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40:1 (2008), 260–266.
26. Mohamed, M.G., Saunier, N., Miranda-Moreno, L.F., Ukkusuri, S.V., A clustering regression approach: a comprehensive injury severity analysis of pedestrian-vehicle crashes in New York, US and Montreal, Canada. Safety Science 54 (2013), 27–37.
27. Moore, D.N., Schneider, W.H. IV, Savolainen, P.T., Farzaneh, M., Mixed logit analysis of bicyclist injury severity resulting from motor vehicle crashes at intersetion and non-intersection locations. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43:3 (2011), 621–630.
28. Morgan, A., Mannering, F.L., The effects of road-surface conditions, age, and gender on driver-injury severities. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43:5 (2011), 1852–1863.
29. Obeng, K., Gender differences in injury severity risks in crashes at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43:4 (2011), 1521–1531.
30. Pahukula, J., Hernandez, S., Unnikrishnan, A., A time of day analysis of crashes involving large trucks in Urban areas. Accident Analysis and Prevention 75 (2015), 155–163.
31. Russo, B.J., Savolainen, P.T., Schneider, W.H. IV, Anastasopoulos, P.C., Comparison of factors affecting injury severity in angle collisions by fault status using a random parameters bivariate ordered probit model. Analytic Methods in Accident Research 2 (2014), 21–29.
32. Savolainen, P., Mannering, F., Probabilistic models of motorcyclists’ injury severities in single- and multi-vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39:5 (2007), 955–963.
33. Shaheed, M.S., Gkritza, K., A latent class analysis of single-vehicle motorcycle crash severity outcomes. Analytic Methods in Accident Research 2 (2014), 30–38.
34. Washington, S.P., Karlaftis, M.G., Mannering, F.L., Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. 2nd ed, 2011, Chapman and Hall/CRC. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
35. Xie, Y., Zhao, K., Huynh, N., Analysis of driver injury severity in rural single-vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention 47 (2012), 36–44.
36. Yasmin, S., Eluru, N., Evaluating alternate discrete outcome frameworks for modeling crash injury severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention 59 (2013), 506–521.
37. Yasmin, S., Eluru, N., Bhat, C.R., Tay, R., A latent segmentation based generalized ordered logit model to examine factors influencing driver injury severity. Analytic Methods in Accident Research 1 (2014), 23–38.
38. Ye, F., Lord, D., Comparing three commonly used crash severity models on sample size requirements: multinomial logit, ordered probit and mixed logit models. Analytic Methods in Accident Research 1 (2014), 72–85.