Application of a narrow-surface cage in full endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

International Journal of Surgery

Volumn 42, Issue , 2017, Pages 83-89

  He, Er xing ^a,b   Guo, Jing ^a,b   Ling, Qin jie ^a,b   Yin, Zhi xun ^a,b   Wang, Ying ^a,b   Li, Ming ^a,b  

^a GUANGZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Guangzhou Orthopaedics Trauma Hospital   (China)

Author keywords

Endoscopy; Fusion cage; Lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive spine surgery

Indexed keywords

POLYETHERETHERKETONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LUMBAR DISK HERNIA; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NARROW SURFACE FUSION CAGE; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGID ENDOSCOPE; SPINE FUSION IMPLANT; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROCEDURES; SPINE FUSION; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SPINAL FUSION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 85018722635     PISSN: 17439191     EISSN: 17439159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.053     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. [1] Wang, Y.T., Wu, X.T., Chen, H., Wang, C., Endoscopy-assisted posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a single segment. J. Clin. Neurosci. 21 (2014), 287–292.
2. [2] Yang, Y., Liu, B., Rong, L.M., Chen, R.Q., Dong, J.W., Xie, P.G., Zhang, L.M., Feng, F., Microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: short-term and medium-term outcomes. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 8 (2015), 21319–21326.
3. [3] Xu, B.S., Liu, Y., Xu, H.W., Yang, Q., Ma, X.L., Hu, Y.C., Intervertebral fusion with Mobile Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Orthop. Surg. 8 (2016), 241–245.
4. [4] Isaacs, R.E., Podichetty, V.K., Santiago, P., Sandhu, F.A., Spears, J., Kelly, K., Rice, L., Fessler, R.G., Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J. Neurosurg. Spine 3 (2005), 98–105.
5. [5] Yao, N., Wang, W., Liu, Y., Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion with B-Twin expandable spinal spacer. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 131 (2011), 791–796.
6. [6] Smith, M.M., Foley, K.T., Microendoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and initial clinical results. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg., 99, 1997 105–105(101).
7. [7] Perezcruet, M.J., Foley, K.T., Isaacs, R.E., Ricewyllie, L., Wellington, R., Smith, M.M., Fessler, R.G., Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical note. Neurosurgery 51 (2002), 129–136.
8. [8] Khoo, L.T., Fessler, R.G., Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery, 51, 2002, S146.
9. [9] Popov, V., Anderson, D.G., Minimal invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Adv. Orthop., 2012, 2012, 645321.
10. [10] Jacquot, F., Gastambide, D., Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?. Int. Orthop. 37 (2013), 1507–1510.
11. [11] Khoo, L.T., Palmer, S., Laich, D.T., Fessler, R.G., Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery, 52, 2003, 1512.
12. [12] Schwender, J.D., Holly, L.T., Rouben, D.P., Foley, K.T., Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 18:Suppl (2005), S1–S6.
13. [13] Ozgur, B.M., Yoo, K., Rodriguez, G., Taylor, W.R., Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Eur. Spine J. 14 (2005), 887–894.
14. [14] Nakai, O., Ookawa, A., Yamaura, I., Long-term roentgenographic and functional changes in patients who were treated with wide fenestration for central lumbar stenosis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 73 (1991), 1184–1191.
15. [15] Shah, R.R., Mohammed, S., Saifuddin, A., Taylor, B.A., Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation. Eur. Spine J. 12 (2003), 378–385.
16. [16] Cho, W., Wu, C., Mehbod, A.A., Transfeldt, E.E., Comparison of cage designs for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical study. Clin. Biomech. 23 (2008), 979–985.
17. [17] Tsitsopoulos, P.P., Serhan, H., Voronov, L.I., Carandang, G., Havey, R.M., Ghanayem, A.J., Patwardhan, A.G., Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 25 (2012), 240–244.
18. [18] Tan, J.S., Bailey, C.S., Dvorak, M.F., Fisher, C.G., Oxland, T.R., Interbody device shape and size are important to strengthen the vertebra-implant interface. Spine, 30, 2005, 638.
19. [19] Ames, C.P., Acosta, F.L. Jr., Chi, J., Iyengar, J., Muiru, W., Acaroglu, E., Puttlitz, C.M., Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels. Spine 30 (2005), E562–E566.
20. [20] Fogel, G.R., Toohey, J.S., Neidre, A., Brantigan, J.W., Outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the 9-mm width lumbar I/F cage and the variable screw placement system. J. Surg. Orthop. Adv. 18 (2009), 77–82.
21. [21] Ha, K.Y., Lee, J.S., Kim, K.W., Bone graft volumetric changes and clinical outcomes after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study with a five-year follow-up. Spine, 34, 2009, 1663.
22. [22] Lin, P.M., Posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique: complications and pitfalls. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 193 (1985), 90–102.
23. [23] Closkey, R.F., Parsons, J.R., Lee, C.K., Blacksin, M.F., Zimmerman, M.C., Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. Analysis of critical bone graft area. Spine 18 (1993), 1011–1015.