Bone graft volumetric changes and clinical outcomes after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: A prospective cohort study with a five-year follow-up

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 1663-1668

  Ha, Kee Yong ^a   Lee, Jun Seok ^b   Kim, Ki Won ^a  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^b Dongshin General Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bone graft; Bone resorption; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF); Posterolateral fusion (PLF); Volume

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILIAC BONE; INSTRUMENTATION; LUMBOSACRAL SPINE; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS;

EID: 68949139254     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aacab5     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Burchardt H. Biology of bone transplantation. Orthop Clin North Am 1987; 18:187-196
2. BodenSD. Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute. Spine 2002;27:S26-31.
3. Boden SD, Sumner DR. Biologic factors affecting spinal fusion and bone regeneration. Spine 1995;20:S102-12.
4. Kim KW, Ha KY, Moon MS, et al. Volumetric change of the graft bone after intertransverse fusion. Spine 1999;24:428-433
5. Xue Q, Li H, Zou X, et al. The Influence of alendronate treatment and bone graft volume on posterior lateral spine fusion in a porcine model. Spine 2005;30:1116-1121
6. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, et al. Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spon-dylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 1997;22:210-219
7. Madan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 2002;27: 1536-1542
8. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-273
9. Goto K, Tajima N, Chosa E, et al. Effects of lumbar spinal fusion on the other lumbar intervertebral levels (three-dimensional finite element analysis). J Orthop Sci 2003;8:577-584
10. Evans JH. Biomechanics of lumbar fusion. Clin Orthop RelatRes 1985;193: 38-46.
11. Sudo H, Oda I, Abumi K, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and lamina strain. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;5:150-155
12. Kumar N, Judith MR, Kumar A, et al. Analysis of stress distribution in lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2005;30:1731-1735
13. Kostuik JP, Valdevit A, Chang HG, et al. Biomechanical testing of the lum-bosacral spine. Spine 1998;23:1721-1728
14. Glazer PA, Colliou O, Lotz JC, et al. Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation. Spine 1996;21:1211-1222