minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: Short-term and medium-term outcomes

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 21319-21326

  Yang, Yang ^a   Liu, Bin ^a   Rong, Li Min ^a   Chen, Rui Qiang ^a   Dong, Jian Wen ^a   Xie, Pei Gen ^a   Zhang, Liang Ming ^a   Feng, Feng ^a  

^a THE THIRD AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Fixed diameter endoscopy; Lumbar degenerative disease; Minimally invasive; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION SCORE; LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROENDOSCOPY ASSISTED MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OSTEOARTHROPATHY; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84954349753     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19405901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Tian W, Xu YF, Liu B, Liu YJ, He D, Yuan Q, Lang Z, Han XG. Computer-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014; [Epub ahead of print].
2. Niesche M, Juratli TA, Sitoci KH, Neidel J, Daubner D, Schackert G, Leimert M. Percutaneous pedicle screw and rod fixation with TLIF in a series of 14 patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014; 124: 25-31.
3. Shen X, Zhang H, Gu X, Gu G, Zhou X, He S. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21: 1612-1616.
4. Tsahtsarlis A, Wood M. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 2300-2305.
5. Rodríguez-Vela J, Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Muñoz-Marín J, Herrera A, Velilla J. Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3-to 4-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2013; 22: 2857-2863.
6. Kim JS, Jung B, Lee SH. Instrumented Minimally Invasive spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF); Minimum 5-years Follow-up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012; [Epub ahead of print].
7. Wu WJ, Liang Y, Zhang XK, Cao P, Zheng T. Complications and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of one-or twolevel degenerative disc diseases of the lumbar spine in patients older than 65 years. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012; 125: 2505-2510.
8. Xiaolong S, Lei W, Hailong Z, Xin G, Guangfei G, Shisheng H. Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013; [Epub ahead of print].
9. Hussein M, Abdeldayem A, Mattar MM. Surgical technique and effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy for large uncontained lumbar disc herniations: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 8 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 2014; 23: 1992-1999.
10. Kulkarni AG, Bassi A, Dhruv A. Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: Technique and results of 188 cases. Indian J Orthop 2014; 48: 81-87.
11. Yoshimoto M, Iwase T, Takebayashi T, Ida K, Yamashita T. Microendoscopic discectomy for far lateral lumbar disk herniation: less surgical invasiveness and minimum 2-year follow-up results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014; 27: E1-E7.
12. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, Rice L, Fessler RG. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 98-105.
13. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, Hsu WK, Dawson EG. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 1497-1503.
14. Cook SD, Patron LP, Christakis PM, Bailey KJ, Banta C, Glazer PA. Comparison of methods for determining the presence and extent of anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 1118-1123.
15. Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, Kim KD, Zwienenberg-Lee M, Alamin T, Bammer R. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19: 77-86.
16. Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 2265-2270.
17. Seng C, Siddiqui MA, Wong KP, Zhang K, Yeo W, Tan SB, Yue WM. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38: 2049-2055.
18. Lee JC, Jang HD, Shin BJ. Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: 1548-1557.
19. Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, Xiangqian F. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 1615-1620.
20. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 9: 560-565.
21. Schoenfeld AJ, Ochoa LM, Bader JO, Belmont PJ Jr. Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: a study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 1577-1582.
22. Carragee EJ. The increasing morbidity of elective spinal stenosis surgery: is it necessary? JAMA 2010; 303: 1309-1310.
23. Brodano GB, Martikos K, Lolli F, Gasbarrini A, Cioni A, Bandiera S, Di Silvestre M, Boriani S, Greggi T. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disc Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013; 28: E559-64.
24. Gu G, Zhang H, Fan G, He S, Cai X, Shen X, Guan X, Zhou X. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease. Int Orthop 2014; 38: 817-824.
25. Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA. Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 2002; 49: 499-517.