Fragmentation

Research Handbook on Climate Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 121-131

  Zelli, Fariborz ^a   Van Asselt, Harro ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018622494     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781783470600.00020     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Abbott, K.W. (2012), The transnational regime complex for climate change, Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy, 30(4), 571-590.
2. Abbott, K.W. (2014), Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change, Transnational Environmental Law, 3(1), 57-88.
3. Abbott, K.W. and D. Snidal (2010), International regulation without international government: improving IO performance through orchestration, Review of International Organizations, 5(3), 315-344.
4. Andonova, L.B., M.M. Betsill and H. Bulkeley (2009), Transnational climate governance, Global Environmental Politics, 9(2), 52-73.
5. Bernstein, S., M. Betsill, M. Hoffmann and M. Paterson (2010), A tale of two Copenhagens: carbon markets and climate governance, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39(1), 161-173.
6. Betsill, M.M. and H. Bulkeley (2004), Transnational networks and global environmental governance: the Cities for Climate Protection Program, International Studies Quarterly, 48(2), 471-493.
7. Betsill, M.M., N.K. Dubash, M. Paterson, H. van Asselt, A. Vihma and H. Winkler (2015), Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader climate governance landscape, Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 1-10.
8. Biermann, F. (2010), Beyond the intergovernmental regime: recent trends in global carbon governance, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(4), 284-288.
9. Biermann, F., P. Pattberg, H. van Asselt and F. Zelli (2009), The fragmentation of global governance architectures:a framework for analysis, Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14-40.
10. Bodansky, D., S. Hoedl, G.E. Metcalf and R.N. Stavins (2014), Facilitating Linkage of Heterogeneous Regional, National and Sub-National Climate Policies through a Future International Agreement, Cambridge, MA:Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
11. Bulkeley, H. (2010), Cities and the governing of climate change, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 229-253.
12. Bulkeley, H. and P. Newell (2010), Governing Climate Change, London: Routledge.
13. Ceres (2011), Climate Risk Disclosure by Insurers: Evaluating Insurer Responses to the NAIC Climate Disclosure Survey, Boston, MA: Ceres.
14. Chan, S. and P. Pauw (2014), A Global Framework for Climate Action: Orchestrating Non-State and Subnational Initiatives for More Effective Global Climate Governance, Bonn: German Development Institute.
15. Conca, K. (2006), Governing Water: Contentious Transnational Politics and Global Institution Building, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. de Coninck, H., C. Fischer, R.G. Newell and T. Ueno (2008), International technology-oriented agreements to address climate change, Energy Policy, 36(1), 335-356.
17. Depledge, J. and F. Yamin (2009), The global climate-change regime: a defence, in D. Helm and C. Hepburn (eds.), The Economics and Politics of Climate Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 433-453.
18. Eckersley, R. (2012), Moving forward in the climate negotiations: multilateralism or minilateralism?, Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 24-42.
19. Falkner, R., H. Stephan and J. Vogler (2010), International climate policy after Copenhagen: towards a ‘building blocks’ approach, Global Policy, 1(3), 252-262.
20. Finnemore, M. and K. Sikkink (1998), International norm dynamics and political change, International Organization, 52(4), 887-917.
21. Gilpin, R. (1986), The richness of the tradition of political realism, in R.O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 301-322.
22. Grieco, J.M. (1993), The relative gains problem for international cooperation: comment, American Political Science Review, 87(3), 729-735.
23. Haas, P.M. (1992), Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination, International Organization, 46(1), 1-35.
24. Hale, T. and C. Roger (2014), Orchestration and transnational climate governance, Review of International Organizations, 9(1), 59-82.
25. Hare, W., C. Stockwell, C. Flachsland and S. Oberthür (2010), The architecture of the global climate regime: a top-down perspective, Climate Policy, 10(6), 600-614.
26. Hoffmann, M.J. (2011), Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Ikenberry, J.G. (2003), Is American multilateralism in decline?, Perspectives on Politics, 1(3), 533-550.
28. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. and J. McGee (2013), Legitimacy in an era of fragmentation: the case of global climate governance, Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 56-78.
29. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. and H. van Asselt (2009), Introduction: exploring and explaining the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(3), 195-211.
30. Keohane, R.O. and D.G. Victor (2011), The regime complex for climate change, Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7-23.
31. Lovell, H. (2010), Governing the carbon offset market, WIREs Climate Change, 1(3), 353-362.
32. Martinez Romera, B. and H. van Asselt (2015), The international regulation of aviation emissions: putting differential treatment in practice, Journal of Environmental Law, 27(2), 259-283.
33. McGee, J.S. (2011), Exclusive minilateralism: an emerging discourse within international climate change governance?, Portal: Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 8(3), 1-29.
34. McGee, J. and R. Taplin (2009), The role of the Asia-Pacific Partnership in discursive contestation of the international climate regime, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(3), 213-238.
35. McGuire, M. (2011), Network management, in M. Bevir (ed.), Sage Handbook of Governance, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 436-453.
36. Moncel, R. and H. van Asselt (2012), All hands on deck! Mobilizing climate change action beyond the UNFCCC, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 21(3), 163-176.
37. Naím, M. (2009), Minilateralism: the magic number to get real international action, Foreign Policy, July/August, 5-8.
38. Okereke, C., H. Bulkeley and H. Schroeder (2009), Conceptualizing climate change governance beyond the international regime, Global Environmental Politics, 9(1), 56-76.
39. Ostrom, E. (2010), Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change, Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550-557.
40. Pacala, S. and R. Socolow (2004), Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies, Science, 305(5686), 968-972.
41. Pattberg, P. and J. Stripple (2008), Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 367-388.
42. Prins, G. and S. Rayner (2007), Time to ditch Kyoto, Nature, 449, 973-975.
43. Rayner, S. (2010), How to eat an elephant: a bottom-up approach to climate policy, Climate Policy, 10(6), 615-621.
44. Selin, H. and S.D. VanDeveer (2009), Changing Climate in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking and Multilevel Governance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Tawney, L. and L. Weischer (2011), Innovation and Technology Transfer: Supporting Low Carbon Development with Climate Finance, WRI Working Paper, Washington, DC: WRI.
46. UNFCCC (2010), Report on Options to Facilitate Collaborative Technology Research and Development. Note by the Chair of the Expert Group on Technology Transfer, UN Doc. FCCC/SBSTA/2010/INF.11, 24 November.
47. UNFCCC (2011), Decision 1/CP.16, The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention, UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1, 15 March.
48. van Asselt, H. (2007), From UN-ity to diversity? The UNFCCC, the Asia-Pacific Partnership, and the future of international law on climate change, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 1(1), 17-28.
49. van Asselt, H. (2012), Managing the fragmentation of international environmental law: forests at the intersection of the climate and biodiversity regimes, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 44(4), 1205-1278.
50. van Asselt, H. and F. Zelli (2014), Connect the dots: managing the fragmentation of global climate governance, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 16(2), 137-155.
51. Van de Graaf, T. (2013), Fragmentation in global energy governance: explaining the creation of IRENA, Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 14-33.
52. Velders, G.J.M., S.O. Andersen, J.S. Daniel, D.W. Fahey and M. McFarland (2007), The importance of the Montreal Protocol in protecting climate, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(12), 4814-4819.
53. Victor, D.G. (2011), Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Victor, D.G., J.C. House and S. Joy (2005), A Madisonian approach to climate policy, Science, 309(5742), 1820-1821.
55. Wagenaar, H. (2011), Meaning in Action. Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis, Armonk, NY:M.E. Sharpe.
56. Willke, H. (1995), Systemtheorie III: Steuerungstheorie, Stuttgart: Fischer.
57. Willke, H. (1997), Supervision des Staates, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
58. World Bank (2008), Development and Climate Change: A Strategic Framework for the World Bank Group, Washington, DC: World Bank.
59. Zelli, F. (2011), The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture, WIREs Climate Change, 2(2), 255-270.
60. Zelli, F. and H. van Asselt (2013), The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance: causes, consequences, and responses, Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 1-13.
61. Zelli, F., A. Gupta and H. van Asselt (2013a), Institutional interactions at the crossroads of trade and environment:the dominance of liberal environmentalism?, Global Governance, 19(1), 105-118.
62. Zelli, F., P. Pattberg, H. Stephan and H. van Asselt (2013b), Global climate governance and energy choices, in A. Goldthau (ed.), The Handbook of Global Energy Policy, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 340-357.
63. Zürn, M. (1993), Problematic social situations and international institutions: on the use of game theory in international politics, in F.R. Pfetsch (ed.), International Relations and Pan-Europe:Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Findings, Münster: Lit, pp. 63-84.