The comparison of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia

Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 129-134

  Saraswat, Namita ^a   Kumar, Aditya ^b   Mishra, Abhijeet ^c   Gupta, Amrita ^b   Saurabh, Gyan ^a   Srivastava, Uma ^a  

^a LADY HARDINGE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^b S N MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^c DR RAM MANOHAR LOHIA HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

Endotracheal tube; IPPV; Laparoscopy; Oropharyngeal seal pressure; Proseal LMA

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; HALOTHANE; NITROUS OXIDE; OXYGEN; PROPOFOL; VECURONIUM;

ADULT; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; APPENDECTOMY; ARTICLE; ASSISTED VENTILATION; BREATHING RATE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; NASOGASTRIC TUBE; NEPHRECTOMY; OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK; OXYGENATION; PHARYNX DISEASE; PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 84863070551     PISSN: 00195049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.79891     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sharma B, Sahai C, Bhattacharya A, Kumar VP, Sood J. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A study of 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic surgery. Indian J Anaesth 2003;47:467-72.
2. Misra MN, Ramamurthy B. The Pro-Seal LMAtm and the tracheal tube: A comparison of events at insertion of the airway device. Internet J Anesthesiol 2008. Vol. 16. [Last accessed on 2010 Jul 9].
3. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal'-a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:650-4.
4. Shroff P, Surekha K. Randomized comparative study between the proseal laryngeal mask airway and the endotracheal tube for laparoscopic surgery. Internet J Anesthesiol 2006. Vol. 11. [Last accessed on 2010 Jul 9].
5. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM, et al. A randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:527-33.
6. Sharma B, Sood J, Sahai C, Kumara VP. Efficacy and safety performance of proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic surgery: Experience of 1000 cases. Indian J Anaesth 2008;52:288-96.
7. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH. The LMA proseal is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth 2002;49:857-62.
8. Fujii Y, Tanaka H, Toyooha H. Circulatory responses to laryngeal mask airway insertion or tracheal intubation in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Can J Anaesth 1997;44:1082-6.
9. Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF, King JA, Roux P, Bennett P, et al. The proseal laryngeal mask: Results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:534-9.
10. Lamb K, James MF, Janicki PK. Laryngeal mask airway for intraocular surgery, effects on intraocular pressure and stress responses. Br J Anaesth 1992;69:143-7.
11. Piper J. Physiological equilibria of gas cavities in the body. In: Fenn WO, Rahn M, editors. Handbook of Physiology. Section 3: Respiration. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society; 1965. p. 1205-20.
12. Brimacombe J. The proseal laryngeal mask airway: An easier and safer approach to tracheal tube/ laryngeal mask exchange. Anaesthesia 2003;97:1192-4.
13. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH. LMA-classic and LMA-proseal are effective alternative to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:71-7.
14. Higgins PP, Chung F, Mezei G. Postoperative sore throat after ambulatory surgery. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:582-4.
15. Rabey PG, Murphy PJ, Langton JA, Barker P, Rowbotham DJ. The effect of the laryngeal mask airway on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in patients during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1992;69:621-30.