Possibilities of using low quality digital elevation models of floodplains in hydraulic numerical models

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2017, Pages

  Laks, Ireneusz ^a   Sojka, Mariusz ^a   Walczak, Zbigniew ^a   Wrózyński, Rafał ^a  

^a POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Accuracy; DEM; Flood inundation; Hydraulic modeling

Indexed keywords

BANKS (BODIES OF WATER); ERROR STATISTICS; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODS; HYDRAULIC MODELS; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; NUMERICAL MODELS; OPTICAL RADAR;

2D NUMERICAL MODELS; ACCURACY; AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS; CALCULATED VALUES; CORRECTION PROCEDURE; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; STANDARD DEVIATION;

SURVEYING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; FLOOD; FLOODPLAIN; FLOW VELOCITY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LIDAR; NUMERICAL MODEL; SATELLITE DATA; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

POLAND [CENTRAL EUROPE]; WARTA RIVER;

EID: 85018462167     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w9040283     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Knebl, M.R.; Yang, Z.L.; Hutchison, K.; Maidment, D.R. Regional scale flood modeling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: A case study for the San Antonio River Basin Summer 2002 storm event. J. Environ. Manag. 2005, 75, 325-336.
2. Bates, P.D. Integrating remote sensing data with flood inundation models: How far have we got? Hydrol. Processes 2012, 26, 2515-2521.
3. Yan, K.; Di Baldassarre, G.; Solomatine, D.P.; Schumann, G.J.P. A review of low-cost space-borne data for flood modelling: Topography, flood extent and water level. Hydrol. Processes 2015, 29, 3368-3387.
4. Vaze, J.; Teng, J.; Spencer, G. Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on topographic indices. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25, 1086-1098.
5. Shafique, M.; van der Meijde, M.; Kerle, N.; van der Meer, F. Impact of DEM source and resolution on topographic seismic amplification. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2011, 13, 420-427.
6. Caviedes-Voullième, D.; García-Navarro, P.; Murillo, J. Influence of mesh structure on 2D full shallow water equations and SCS Curve Number simulation of rainfall/runoff events. J. Hydrol. 2012, 448, 39-59.
7. Dutta, D.; Herath, S. Effect of DEM Accuracy in Flood Inundation Simulation using Distributed Hydrological Models. Seisan Kenkyu 2001, 53, 602-605.
8. Yilmaz, M.; Usul, N.; Akyurek, A. Modeling the propagation of DEM uncertainty in flood inundation. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ESRI International User Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 9-13 August 2004.
9. Wechsler, S. Uncertainties associated with digital elevation models for hydrologic applications: A review. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2007, 11, 1481-1500.
10. Walczak, Z.; Sojka, M.; Wrózynski, R.; Laks, I. Estimation of Polder Retention Capacity Based on ASTER, SRTM and LIDAR DEMs: The Case of Majdany Polder (West Poland). Water 2016, 8, 230.
11. Merwade, V.; Cook, A.; Coonrod, J. GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. Environ. Model. Softw. 2008, 23, 1300-1311.
12. Asante, K.O.; Arlan, G.A.; Pervez, S.; Rowland, J. A linear geospatial streamflow modeling system for data sparse environments. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2008, 6, 233-241.
13. Gichamo, T.Z.; Popescu, I.; Jonoski, A.; Solomatine, D. River cross-section extraction from the ASTER global DEM for flood modeling. Environ. Model. Softw. 2012, 31, 37-46.
14. Höhle, J.; Höhle, M. Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2009, 64, 398-406.
15. Weng, Q. Quantifying uncertainty of digital elevation models derived from topographic maps. In Advances in Spatial Data Handling; SpringerBerlin: Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; pp. 403-418.
16. Gallay, M.; Lloyd, C.; McKinley, J. Using geographicallyWeighted regression for analysing elevation error of high-resolution DEMS. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Accuracy Symposium, Leicester, UK, 20-23 July 2010.
17. Saksena, S.; Merwade, V. Incorporating the effect of DEM resolution and accuracy for improved flood inundation mapping. J. Hydrol. 2015, 530, 180-194.
18. Zhou, Q.; Chen, Y. Generalization of DEM for terrain analysis using a compound method. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2011, 66, 38-45.
19. Karwel, A.K. Estimation of DEM accuracy on the area of Poland based on the elevation data of the LIPS project. Arch. Fotogram. Kartogr. Teledetekcji 2007, 17, 357-362. (In Polish).
20. Pazus, R.; Osada, E.; Olejnik, S. Levelling geoid 2001. Geodeta Magazyn Geoinformacyjny 2002, 5, 10-17. (In Polish).
21. Lyszkowicz, A. Geoid in the area of Poland in the author's investigations. Tech. Sci. 2012, 15, 49-64.
22. Erdogan, S. Modelling the spatial distribution of DEM error with geographically weighted regression: An experimental study. Comput. Geosci. 2010, 36, 34-43.
23. Anselin, L. GeoDa™ 0.9 User's Guide. Urbana 2003, 51, 61801.
24. Taud, H.; Parrot, J.-F.; Alvarez, R. DEM generation by contour line dilation. Comput. Geosci. 1999, 25, 775-783.
25. Oky Dicky Ardiansyah, P.; Yokoyama, R. DEM generation method from contour lines based on the steepest slope segment chain and a monotone interpolation function. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2002, 57, 86-101.
26. Xie, K.; Wu, Y.; Ma, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, B.; Hessel, R. Using contour lines to generate digital elevation models for steep slope areas: A case study of the Loess Plateau in North China. Catena 2003, 54, 161-171.
27. Hashimoto, T. DEM generation from stereo AVNIR images. Adv. Space Res. 2000, 25, 931-936.
28. Kornus, W.; Alamús, R.; Ruiz, A.; Talaya, J. DEM generation from SPOT-5 3-fold along track stereoscopic imagery using autocalibration. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2006, 60, 147-159.
29. Walczak, Z.; Sojka, M.; Laks, I. Assessment of mapping of embankments and control structure on digital elevation model based up on Majdany polder. Annu. Set Environ. Prot. 2013, 15, 2711-2724.
30. Schröder, P.-M. Zur Numerischen Simulation Turbulenter Freispiegelströmungen Mit Ausgeprägt Dreidimensionaler Charakteristik; Mitteilungen des Instituts für Wasserbau und Wasserwirtschaft der RWTH: Mainz, Germany, 1997 (In Germany)
31. Sroka, Z.; Walczak, Z.; Wosiewicz, B.J. Analiza Ustalonych Przeplywów wód Gruntowych Metoda? Elementów Skonczonych; Oprogramowanie In ? zynierskie; Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej im. Augusta Cieszkowskiego w Poznaniu: Pozna n, Poland, 2004. (In Polish)
32. Suárez, J.P.; Plaza, A. Four-triangles adaptive algorithms for RTIN terrain meshes. Math. Comput. Model. 2009, 49, 1012-1020.
33. Anderson, E.S.; Thompson, J.A.; Crouse, D.A.; Austin, R.E. Horizontal resolution and data density effects on remotely sensed LIDAR-based DEM. Geoderma 2006, 132, 406-415.
34. Ai, T.; Li, J. A DEM generalization by minor valley branch detection and grid filling. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2010, 65, 198-207.
35. Horritt, M.S.; Bates, P.D.; Mattinson, M.J. Effects of mesh resolution and topographic representation in 2D finite volume models of shallow water fluvial flow. J. Hydrol. 2006, 329, 306-314.
36. Schubert, J.E.; Sanders, B.F.; Smith, M.J.; Wright, N.G. Unstructured mesh generation and landcover-based resistance for hydrodynamic modeling of urban flooding. Adv. Water Resour. 2008, 31, 1603-1621.
37. Büttner, O. The influence of topographic and mesh resolution in 2D hydrodynamic modelling for floodplains and Urban areas. Geophys. Res. Abstr. 2007, 9, 08232.
38. Rismo2D. Finite-Elemente Modellierungsve Rfahren zur 2D-Tiefengemittelten Simulation Stationärer und Instationärer Strömungen. Available online: http://www.hnware.de (accessed on 7 September 2016).
39. Wosiewicz, B.; Laks, I.; Sroka, Z. Computer system of flow simulation for the Warta river. In Prace Naukowe Instytutu Geotechniki i Hydromechaniki Politechniki Wroclawskiej, seria Konferencje; Wroclaw University of Technology: Wroclaw, Poland, 1996; Volume 38.
40. Preissmann, A. Propagation of translatory waves in channels and rivers. In Proceedings of the 1st Congress of French Association for Computation, Grenoble, France, 14-16 September 1961; pp. 433-442.