Horizontal resolution and data density effects on remotely sensed LIDAR-based DEM

Geoderma

Volumn 132, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 406-415

  Anderson, Eric S ^a   Thompson, James A ^b   Crouse, David A ^a   Austin, Rob E ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data reduction; Digital elevation model; LIDAR; Resolution

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; ECOLOGY; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; SOILS; WATERSHEDS;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL (DEM); ECOLOGIC PROPERTIES; PEDOLOGIC PROCESSES; SPATIAL VARIABILITY;

OPTICAL RADAR;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; FLOOD; FORESTRY; LANDSCAPE; LIDAR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ATLANTIC ISLANDS; ATLANTIC OCEAN; CARIBBEAN ISLANDS; CAROLINA; GREATER ANTILLES; PUERTO RICO;

EID: 33646241525     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bell J.C., Grigal D.F., and Bates P.C. A soil-terrain model for estimating spatial patterns of soil organic carbon. In: Wilson J.P., and Gallant J.C. (Eds). Terrain Analysis-Principles and Applications (2000), Wiley, New York 295-310
2. Chaplot V., Walter C., and Curmi P. Improving soil hydromorphy prediction according to DEM resolution and available pedological data. Geoderma 97 (2000) 405-422
3. Chaplot V., Bernoux M., Walter C., Curmi P., and Herpin U. Soil carbon storage prediction in temperate hydromorphic soils using a morphologic index and digital elevation model. Soil Sci. 166 (2001) 48-60
4. Daniels R.B., Gamble E.E., Wheeler W.H., and Holzhey C.S. The stratigraphy and geomorphology of the Hofmann Forest Pocosin, North Carolina. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41 (1977) 1175-1180
5. Daniels R.B., Buol S.W., Kleiss H.J., and Ditzler C.A. Soil systems of North Carolina. Tech. Bull. vol. 314 (1999), North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh
6. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). ARC/INFO User's Guide (2003), Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, USA
7. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). FEMA's Flood Hazard Mapping Program: Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners (2003). http:www.FEMA.gov/fhm/gs_main.shtm www.FEMA.gov/fhm/gs_main.shtm
8. Florinsky I.V., and Kuryakova G.A. Determination of grid size for digital terrain modeling in landscape investigations-exemplified by soil moisture distribution at a micro-scale. Int. J. GIS 14 8 (2000) 815-832
9. Florinsky I.V., Eilers R.G., Manning G.R., and Fuller L.G. Prediction of soil properties by digital terrain modeling. Environ. Model. Soft. 17 (2002) 295-311
10. Gessler P.E., Moore I.D., McKenzie N.J., and Ryan P.J. Soil-landscape modelling and the spatial prediction of soil attributes. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 9 (1995) 421-432
11. Gessler P.E., Chadwick O.A., Chamran F., Althouse L.D., and Holmes K.W. Modeling soil-landscape and ecosystem properties using terrain attributes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64 (2000) 2046-2056
12. http://www.ncfloodmaps.com. Last updated February 2004.
13. Hutchinson M.F. Documentation for ANUDEM version 4.4. Centre for Resources and Environmental Studies (1995), Australian National University, Canberra
14. Jenson S.K. Application of hydrologic information automatically extracted from digital elevation modeling. In: Bevens K.J., and Moore I.D. (Eds). Terrain Analysis and Distributed Modeling in Hydrology (1991), Wiley and Son, Chichester, NY 35-48
15. Lefsky M.A., Cohen W.B., Parker G.G., and Harding D.J. LiDAR remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience 52 1 (2002) 19-30
16. Lloyd C.D., and Atkinson P.M. Deriving DSMs from LiDAR data with kriging. Int. J. Remote Sens. 23 12 (2002) 2519-2524
17. Lohr U. Digital elevation models by laser scanning. Photogramm. Rec. 16 91 (1998) 105-109
18. McBratney A.B., Odeh I.O.A., Bishop T.F.A., Dunbar M.S., and Shatar T.M. An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey. Geoderma 97 (2000) 293-327
19. McKenzie N.J., and Ryan P.J. Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation. Geoderma 89 (1999) 67-94
20. Moore I.D., Gessler P.E., Nielsen G.A., and Peterson G.A. Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57 (1993) 443-452
21. Park S.J., McSweeney K., and Lowery B. Identification of the spatial distribution of soils using a process-based terrain characterization. Geoderma 103 (2001) 249-272
22. Thieken A.H., Lücke A., Diekkrüger B., and Richter O. Scaling input data by GIS for hydrological modeling. Hydrol. Process. 13 (1999) 611-630
23. Thompson J.A., and Kolka R.K. Soil carbon storage estimation in a central hardwood forest watershed using quantitative soil-landscape modeling. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69 (2005) 1086-1093
24. Thompson J.A., Bell J.C., and Butler C.A. Quantitative soil-landscape modeling for estimating the areal extent of hydromorphic soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61 (1997) 971-980
25. Thompson J.A., Bell J.C., and Butler C.A. Digital elevation model resolution: effects on terrain attribute calculation and quantitative soil-landscape modeling. Geoderma 100 (2001) 67-89
26. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Standards for Digital Elevation Models (1998), National Mapping Program, Reston, VA
27. Webster R. The development of pedometrics. Geoderma 62 (1994) 2-15
28. Wehr A., and Lohr U. Airborne laser scanning-an introduction and overview. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 54 2-3 (1999) 68-82
29. Zhang W., and Montgomery D.R. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrological simulations. Water Resour. Res. 30 (1994) 1019-1028