Augury of darkness: the low-mass dark Z ′ portal

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2017, Issue 4, 2017, Pages

  Alves, Alexandre ^a   Arcadi, Giorgio ^b   Mambrini, Yann ^c   Profumo, Stefano ^d,e   Queiroz, Farinaldo S ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR KERNPHYSIK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018454075     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2017)164     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13 [arXiv:1502.01589] [INSPIRE].
2. J.L. Feng, Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48 (2010) 495 [arXiv:1003.0904] [INSPIRE].
3. J. Silk et al., Particle dark matter: observations, models and searches, (2010).
4. H. Baer, K.-Y. Choi, J.E. Kim and L. Roszkowski, Dark matter production in the early universe: beyond the thermal WIMP paradigm, Phys. Rept. 555 (2015) 1 [arXiv:1407.0017] [INSPIRE].
5. L.E. Strigari, Galactic searches for dark matter, Phys. Rept. 531 (2013) 1 [arXiv:1211.7090] [INSPIRE].
6. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
7. E. Del Nobile, Halo-independent comparison of direct dark matter detection data: a review, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2014 (2014) 604914 [arXiv:1404.4130] [INSPIRE].
8. T. Marrodán Undagoitia and L. Rauch, Dark matter direct-detection experiments, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 013001 [arXiv:1509.08767] [INSPIRE].
9. F. Mayet et al., A review of the discovery reach of directional dark matter detection, Phys. Rept. 627 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1602.03781] [INSPIRE].
10. F.S. Queiroz, W. Rodejohann and C.E. Yaguna, Is the dark matter particle its own antiparticle?, arXiv:1610.06581 [INSPIRE].
11. S. Profumo, Astrophysical probes of dark matter, in Proceedings, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Searching for New Physics at Small and Large Scales (TASI 2012), Boulder U.S.A., 4-29 June 2012, pg. 143 [arXiv:1301.0952] [INSPIRE].
12. J. Conrad, Indirect detection of WIMP dark matter: a compact review, in Interplay between Particle and Astroparticle physics (IPA2014), London U.K., 18-22 August 2014 [arXiv:1411.1925] [INSPIRE].
13. F.S. Queiroz, Dark matter overview: collider, direct and indirect detection searches, arXiv:1605.08788 [INSPIRE].
14. N. Fornengo, R.A. Lineros, M. Regis and M. Taoso, Galactic synchrotron emission from WIMPs at radio frequencies, JCAP 01 (2012) 005 [arXiv:1110.4337] [INSPIRE].
15. Y. Mambrini, M.H.G. Tytgat, G. Zaharijas and B. Zaldivar, Complementarity of galactic radio and collider data in constraining WIMP dark matter models, JCAP 11 (2012) 038 [arXiv:1206.2352] [INSPIRE].
16. D. Abercrombie et al., Dark matter benchmark models for early LHC run-2 searches: report of the ATLAS/CMS dark matter forum, arXiv:1507.00966 [INSPIRE].
17. J. Edsjo and P. Gondolo, Neutralino relic density including coannihilations, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 1879 [hep-ph/9704361] [INSPIRE].
18. K. Griest, Cross-sections, relic abundance and detection rates for neutralino dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 2357
19. [Erratum ibid. D 39 (1989) 3802]
20. S. Profumo, TeV gamma-rays and the largest masses and annihilation cross sections of neutralino dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 103521 [astro-ph/0508628] [INSPIRE].
21. C. Garcia-Cely and J. Heeck, Phenomenology of left-right symmetric dark matter, JCAP 03 (2016) 021 [arXiv:1512.03332] [INSPIRE].
22. C. Karwin, S. Murgia, T.M.P. Tait, T.A. Porter and P. Tanedo, Dark matter interpretation of the Fermi-LAT observation toward the galactic center, arXiv:1612.05687 [INSPIRE].
23. J.K. Mizukoshi, C.A. de S. Pires, F.S. Queiroz and P.S. Rodrigues da Silva, WIMPs in a 3-3-1 model with heavy sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 065024 [arXiv:1010.4097] [INSPIRE].
24. RHNmodel, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2029 [arXiv:1201.1268] [INSPIRE].
25. J.D. Ruiz-Alvarez, C.A. de S. Pires, F.S. Queiroz, D. Restrepo and P.S. Rodrigues da Silva, On the connection of gamma-rays, dark matter and Higgs searches at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075011 [arXiv:1206.5779] [INSPIRE].
26. D. Cogollo, A.X. Gonzalez-Morales, F.S. Queiroz and P.R. Teles, Excluding the light dark matter window of a 331 model using LHC and direct dark matter detection data, JCAP 11 (2014) 002 [arXiv:1402.3271] [INSPIRE].
27. ′ model, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 095004 [arXiv:1408.5153] [INSPIRE].
28. μ, electroweak, dark matter and collider constraints on 331 models, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 113011 [arXiv:1408.6203] [INSPIRE].
29. A. Alves, S. Profumo, F.S. Queiroz and W. Shepherd, Effective field theory approach to the galactic center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 115003 [arXiv:1403.5027] [INSPIRE].
30. ′ models for the LHCb and g − 2 muon anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 055045 [arXiv:1511.07447] [INSPIRE].
31. P.V. Dong, N.T.K. Ngan and D.V. Soa, Simple 3-3-1 model and implication for dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 075019 [arXiv:1407.3839] [INSPIRE].
32. P.V. Dong, C.S. Kim, D.V. Soa and N.T. Thuy, Investigation of dark matter in minimal 3-3-1 models, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 115019 [arXiv:1501.04385] [INSPIRE].
33. A. Alves, G. Arcadi, P.V. Dong, L. Duarte, F.S. Queiroz and J.W.F. Valle, R-parity as a residual gauge symmetry: probing a theory of cosmological dark matter, arXiv:1612.04383 [INSPIRE].
34. ′ models, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 035022 [arXiv:1106.0885] [INSPIRE].
35. H. An, R. Huo and L.-T. Wang, Searching for low mass dark portal at the LHC, Phys. Dark Univ. 2 (2013) 50 [arXiv:1212.2221] [INSPIRE].
36. ′ mass in 331 models using direct dark matter detection, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2960 [arXiv:1307.7802] [INSPIRE].
37. ′ portal: direct, indirect and collider searches, JHEP 04 (2014) 063 [arXiv:1312.5281] [INSPIRE].
38. ′ and dark matter: LHC vs LUX constraints, JHEP 03 (2014) 134 [arXiv:1401.0221] [INSPIRE].
39. A. De Simone, G.F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Benchmarks for dark matter searches at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2014) 081 [arXiv:1402.6287] [INSPIRE].
40. ′ -mediated dark matter and the galactic center gamma ray excess, JHEP 08 (2014) 131 [arXiv:1405.7691] [INSPIRE].
41. ′ as a single dark matter candidate, JHEP 05 (2014) 088 [arXiv:1403.2918] [INSPIRE].
42. W.-Z. Feng, G. Shiu, P. Soler and F. Ye, Probing hidden sectors with Stückelberg U(1) gauge fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 061802 [arXiv:1401.5880] [INSPIRE].
43. ′, Phys. Lett. B 734 (2014) 350 [arXiv:1403.4837] [INSPIRE].
44. P.V. Dong, D.T. Huong, F.S. Queiroz and N.T. Thuy, Phenomenology of the 3-3-1-1 model, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 075021 [arXiv:1405.2591] [INSPIRE].
45. F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, T. Schwetz and S. Vogl, Implications of unitarity and gauge invariance for simplified dark matter models, JHEP 02 (2016) 016 [arXiv:1510.02110] [INSPIRE].
46. C. Marcos, M. Peiro and S. Robles, On the importance of direct detection combined limits for spin independent and spin dependent dark matter interactions, JCAP 03 (2016) 019 [arXiv:1507.08625] [INSPIRE].
47. M. Chala, F. Kahlhoefer, M. McCullough, G. Nardini and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Constraining dark sectors with monojets and dijets, JHEP 07 (2015) 089 [arXiv:1503.05916] [INSPIRE].
48. − collider searches, arXiv:1501.04486 [INSPIRE].
49. ′ mediator between dark matter and the SU(3) sector, JHEP 03 (2016) 006 [arXiv:1509.05615] [INSPIRE].
50. V.M. Lozano, M. Peiró and P. Soler, Isospin violating dark matter in Stückelberg portal scenarios, JHEP 04 (2015) 175 [arXiv:1503.01780] [INSPIRE].
51. ′ in models with multiple Higgs doublet fields, JHEP 05 (2015) 127 [arXiv:1502.00855] [INSPIRE].
52. Xextended Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 035025 [arXiv:1611.02672] [INSPIRE].
53. − with U(1) gauge symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 035018 [arXiv:1608.03894] [INSPIRE].
54. M. Klasen, F. Lyonnet and F.S. Queiroz, NLO+NLL collider bounds, Dirac fermion and scalar dark matter in the B-L model, arXiv:1607.06468 [INSPIRE].
55. N.F. Bell, Y. Cai and R.K. Leane, Impact of mass generation for spin-1 mediator simplified models, JCAP 01 (2017) 039 [arXiv:1610.03063] [INSPIRE].
56. Xdark sector, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 115015 [arXiv:1607.06218] [INSPIRE].
57. M. Duerr, F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, T. Schwetz and S. Vogl, How to save the WIMP: global analysis of a dark matter model with two s-channel mediators, JHEP 09 (2016) 042 [arXiv:1606.07609] [INSPIRE].
58. ′ models from LHC dijet searches and implications for dark matter, JHEP 09 (2016) 018 [arXiv:1605.07940] [INSPIRE].
59. ′, JHEP 10 (2016) 071 [arXiv:1605.06513] [INSPIRE].
60. C. Englert, M. McCullough and M. Spannowsky, s-channel dark matter simplified models and unitarity, Phys. Dark Univ. 14 (2016) 48 [arXiv:1604.07975] [INSPIRE].
61. ′ boson interactions with nucleons, arXiv:1611.03367 [INSPIRE].
62. τ model, JHEP 12 (2016) 106 [arXiv:1609.04026] [INSPIRE].
63. ′ portal dark matter and LHC run-2 results, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 075003 [arXiv:1601.07526] [INSPIRE].
64. ′ jet, JHEP 06 (2015) 205 [arXiv:1504.01395] [INSPIRE].
65. ′ and anomaly cancellation, Nucl. Phys. B 918 (2017) 220 [arXiv:1609.02188] [INSPIRE].
66. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the differential and double-differential Drell-Yan cross sections in proton-proton collisions at s=7 TeV, JHEP 12 (2013) 030 [arXiv:1310.7291] [INSPIRE].
67. ATLAS collaboration, Search for high-mass dilepton resonances in pp collisions at s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 052005 [arXiv:1405.4123] [INSPIRE].
68. ′ portal, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 083004 [arXiv:1501.03490] [INSPIRE].
69. X models, JHEP 10 (2015) 076 [arXiv:1506.06767] [INSPIRE].
70. I. Hoenig, G. Samach and D. Tucker-Smith, Searching for dilepton resonances below the Z mass at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 075016 [arXiv:1408.1075] [INSPIRE].
71. J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
72. A. Alloul, J. D’Hondt, K. De Causmaecker, B. Fuks and M. Rausch de Traubenberg, Automated mass spectrum generation for new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2325 [arXiv:1301.5932] [INSPIRE].
73. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: going beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
74. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
75. DELPHES 3 collaboration, J. de Favereau et al., DELPHES 3, a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
76. M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini and M. Treccani, Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-quark production in hadronic collisions, JHEP 01 (2007) 013 [hep-ph/0611129] [INSPIRE].
77. ATLAS collaboration, Search for new high-mass resonances in the dilepton final state using proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2016-045, CERN, Geneva Switzerland, (2016).
78. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554
79. [Erratum ibid. C 73 (2013) 2501]
80. G. Arcadi, Y. Mambrini and F. Richard, Z-portal dark matter, JCAP 03 (2015) 018 [arXiv:1411.2985] [INSPIRE].
81. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates, Comput. Phys. Commun. 192 (2015) 322 [arXiv:1407.6129] [INSPIRE].
82. DES and Fermi-LAT collaborations, A. Albert et al., Searching for dark matter annihilation in recently discovered milky way satellites with Fermi-LAT, Astrophys. J. 834 (2017) 110 [arXiv:1611.03184] [INSPIRE].
83. D. Hooper, C. Kelso and F.S. Queiroz, Stringent and robust constraints on the dark matter annihilation cross section from the region of the galactic center, Astropart. Phys. 46 (2013) 55 [arXiv:1209.3015] [INSPIRE].
84. T. Bringmann and C. Weniger, Gamma ray signals from dark matter: concepts, status and prospects, Phys. Dark Univ. 1 (2012) 194 [arXiv:1208.5481] [INSPIRE].
85. L. Bergstrom, T. Bringmann, I. Cholis, D. Hooper and C. Weniger, New limits on dark matter annihilation from AMS cosmic ray positron data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 171101 [arXiv:1306.3983] [INSPIRE].
86. A.X. Gonzalez-Morales, S. Profumo and F.S. Queiroz, Effect of black holes in local dwarf spheroidal galaxies on gamma-ray constraints on dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 103508 [arXiv:1406.2424] [INSPIRE].
87. S. Profumo, F.S. Queiroz and C.E. Yaguna, Extending Fermi-LAT and H.E.S.S. limits on gamma-ray lines from dark matter annihilation, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 461 (2016) 3976 [arXiv:1602.08501] [INSPIRE].
88. R. Caputo et al., Search for gamma-ray emission from dark matter annihilation in the small Magellanic cloud with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 062004 [arXiv:1603.00965] [INSPIRE].
89. H.-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang, Revisiting scalar and pseudoscalar couplings with nucleons, JHEP 07 (2012) 009 [arXiv:1202.1292] [INSPIRE].
90. F. D’Eramo, B.J. Kavanagh and P. Panci, You can hide but you have to run: direct detection with vector mediators, JHEP 08 (2016) 111 [arXiv:1605.04917] [INSPIRE].
91. PandaX-II collaboration, C. Fu et al., Spin-dependent weakly-interacting-massive-particle-nucleon cross section limits from first data of PandaX-II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 071301 [arXiv:1611.06553] [INSPIRE].
92. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303 [arXiv:1608.07648] [INSPIRE].
93. M. Escudero, D. Hooper and S.J. Witte, Updated collider and direct detection constraints on dark matter models for the galactic center gamma-ray excess, JCAP 02 (2017) 038 [arXiv:1612.06462] [INSPIRE].
94. M. Lindner, M. Platscher and F.S. Queiroz, A call for new physics: the muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation, arXiv:1610.06587 [INSPIRE].
95. C.E. Yaguna, Isospin-violating dark matter in the light of recent data, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 055015 [arXiv:1610.08683] [INSPIRE].
96. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145 [INSPIRE].
97. K. Griest and D. Seckel, Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3191 [INSPIRE].
98. L. Goodenough and D. Hooper, Possible evidence for dark matter annihilation in the inner milky way from the Fermi gamma ray space telescope, arXiv:0910.2998 [INSPIRE].
99. D. Hooper and L. Goodenough, Dark matter annihilation in the galactic center as seen by the Fermi gamma ray space telescope, Phys. Lett. B 697 (2011) 412 [arXiv:1010.2752] [INSPIRE].
100. A. Boyarsky, D. Malyshev and O. Ruchayskiy, A comment on the emission from the galactic center as seen by the Fermi telescope, Phys. Lett. B 705 (2011) 165 [arXiv:1012.5839] [INSPIRE].
101. D. Hooper and T. Linden, On the origin of the gamma rays from the galactic center, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 123005 [arXiv:1110.0006] [INSPIRE].
102. K.N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, Detection of a gamma-ray source in the galactic center consistent with extended emission from dark matter annihilation and concentrated astrophysical emission, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083511
103. [Erratum ibid. D 87 (2013) 129902]
104. D. Hooper and T.R. Slatyer, Two emission mechanisms in the Fermi bubbles: a possible signal of annihilating dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 2 (2013) 118 [arXiv:1302.6589] [INSPIRE].
105. C. Gordon and O. Macias, Dark matter and pulsar model constraints from galactic center Fermi-LAT gamma ray observations, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 083521
106. [Erratum ibid. D 89 (2014) 049901]
107. W.-C. Huang, A. Urbano and W. Xue, Fermi bubbles under dark matter scrutiny. Part I: astrophysical analysis, arXiv:1307.6862 [INSPIRE].
108. T. Daylan et al., The characterization of the gamma-ray signal from the central milky way: a case for annihilating dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 12 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1402.6703] [INSPIRE].
109. K.N. Abazajian, N. Canac, S. Horiuchi and M. Kaplinghat, Astrophysical and dark matter interpretations of extended gamma-ray emission from the galactic center, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 023526 [arXiv:1402.4090] [INSPIRE].
110. F. Calore, I. Cholis and C. Weniger, Background model systematics for the Fermi GeV excess, JCAP 03 (2015) 038 [arXiv:1409.0042] [INSPIRE].
111. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ajello et al., Fermi-LAT observations of high-energy γ-ray emission toward the galactic center, Astrophys. J. 819 (2016) 44 [arXiv:1511.02938] [INSPIRE].
112. ′ mediated dark matter models for the galactic center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 035025 [arXiv:1411.4079] [INSPIRE].
113. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Searching for dark matter annihilation from milky way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with six years of Fermi Large Area Telescope data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 231301 [arXiv:1503.02641] [INSPIRE].