Catchment-based imperviousness metrics impacts on floods in Niushou River basin, Nanjing City, East China

Chinese Geographical Science

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 229-238

  Su, Weizhong ^a   Duan, Hongtao ^a  

^a NANJING INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND LIMNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

catchment system; floods areas; imperviousness pattern; imperviousness ratio (IR); Niushou River basin

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENT; DRAINAGE NETWORK; FLOOD; FLOODING; RIVER BASIN; RUNOFF;

CHINA; JIANGSU; NANJING [JIANGSU]; NIUSHOU BASIN;

EID: 85018373976     PISSN: 10020063     EISSN: 1993064X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11769-017-0861-2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Brabec E A, 2002. Impervious surfaces and water quality: a review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(4): 499–514. doi: 10.1177/088541202400903563
2. Brabec E A, 2009. Imperviousness and land-use policy: toward an effective approach to watershed planning. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14(4): 425–433. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(425)
3. Campana N A, Tucci C E, 2001. Predicting floods from urban development scenarios: Case study of the Dilúvio Basin, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Urban Water, 3(1): 113–124. doi: 10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00004-8
4. Chaves M L, Camozzato A L, Eizirik C L et al., 2009. Predictors of normal and successful aging among urban-dwelling elderly Brazilians. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(5): 597–602. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp059
5. Chen Liqun, 2010. Applicability research of SWMM on the urban drainage plan design. Water and Wastewater Engineering, 36(5): 114–117. (in Chinese)
6. Coffmann L, 2000. Low-impact development design: a new paradigm for stormwater management mimicking and restoring the natural hydrologic regime—An alternative stormwater management technology. In: Proceedings from the National Conference on Tools for Urban Water Resource Management and Protection, February 2000, 1–158.
7. Delleur J W, 2003. The evolution of urban hydrology: past, present, and future. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129(8): 563–573. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:8(563)
8. Fang Chuanglin, Ma Hongtao, 2013. New city district development and intensive land use in the context of new-type urbanization. China Land Science, 27(7): 4–9. (in Chinese)
9. Goldshleger N, Karnibad L, Shoshany M et al., 2012. Generalising urban runoff and street network density relationship: a hydrological and remote-sensing case study in Israel. Urban Water Journal, 9(3): 189–197. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2011.652128
10. Gunn R, Martin A, Engel B et al., 2012. Development of two indices for determining hydrologic implications of land use changes in urban areas. Urban Water Journal, 9(4): 239–248. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2012.660957
11. Haase D, 2009. Effects of urbanisation on the water balance—A long-term trajectory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(4): 211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.002
12. Isidoro J M, de Lima J L, Leandro J, 2012. Influence of winddriven rain on the rainfall-runoff process for urban areas: Scale model of high-rise buildings. Urban Water Journal, 9(3): 199–210. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2012.654801
13. Mejía A I, Moglen G E, 2009. Spatial patterns of urban development from optimization of flood peaks and imperviousness- based measures. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14(4): 416–424. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(416)
14. Mejía A I, Moglen G E, 2010. Impact of the spatial distribution of imperviousness on the hydrologic response of an urbanizing basin. Hydrological Processes, 24(23): 3359–3373. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7755
15. Mikkelsen P S, Madsen H, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K et al., 2005. Selection of regional historical rainfall time series as input to urban drainage simulations at ungauged locations. Atmospheric Research, 77(1): 4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.10.016
16. Oraei Zare S, Saghafian B, Shamsai A et al., 2012. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms for qualitative and quantitative control of urban runoff. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 9(1): 777–817. doi: 10.5194/hessd-9-777-2012,2012
17. Parkinson J, Mark O, 2005. Urban Stormwater Management in Developing Countries. London: IWA publishing.
18. Pauleit S, Ennos R, Golding Y, 2005. Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change—A study in Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(2): 295–310. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.03.009
19. Pielke R A, 2005. Land use and climate change. Science, 310(5754): 1625–1626. doi: 10.1126/science.1120529
20. Rossman L A, 2010. SWMM (Storm-water Management Model) Version 5.02 User's Manual. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Open File Manual. Washington DC, United States: EPA/600/R-05/040,295.
21. Shuster W D, Bonta J, Thurston H et al., 2005. Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review. Urban Water Journal, 2(4): 263–275. doi: 10.1080/15730620500386529
22. Su W Z,Gu C L,Yang G S et al., 2010. Measuring the impact of urban sprawl on natural landscape pattern of the Western Taihu Lake watershed, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(1): 61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.003
23. Su Weizhong, Yang Guishan, Chen Shuang, 2012. The impact of urban spatial expansion on regional environment of flood hazards gestation: a case study in Jiangning District of Nanjing City. Resources Science, 34(5): 934–940. (in Chinese)
24. United Nations, 2014. 2014 Revision of World Population Prospects. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
25. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 2014. Storm Water Management Model. Available online: http://www. epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/wq/models/swmm/ (accessed on 10 September 2014).
26. van Roon M, Van Roon HT, Trueman S, 2009. Low Impact Urban Design and Development: The Big Picture: An Introduction to the LIUDD Principles and Methods Framework. New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press.
27. van Roon M, 2011. Low impact urban design and development: Catchment-based structure planning to optimise ecological outcomes. Urban Water Journal, 8(5): 293–308. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2011.598172
28. Vörösmarty C J, Green P, Salisbury J et al., 2000. Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 289(5477): 284. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5477.284
29. Xu Jintao, Xu Youpeng, Ye Zhengwei, 2011. Observation and simulation of hydrological processes in urban districts. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 20: 445–450. (in Chinese)
30. Xu Youpeng, Ding Jinjia, Chen Ying, 2009. Impacts of urbanization on hydrology in the Yangtze River delta. Hydro-science and Engineering, (4): 67–73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-640X.2009.04.009 (in Chinese)
31. Zheng Jing, Fang Weihua, Shi Peijun, 2009. Modeling the impacts of land use change on hydrological processes in fast urbanizing region. Journal of Natural Resources, 24(9): 1560–1570. (in Chinese)
32. Zheng P Q, Baetz B W, 1999. GIS-based analysis of development options from a hydrology perspective. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 125(4): 164–180. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1999)125:4(164)
33. Zhou Feng, Xu Youpeng, Shi Yi, 2012. Risk zoning study of flood disaster based on AHP-OWA method. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2012, 21(6): 83–90. (in Chinese)
34. Zhu Mengjue, Zhou Chunshan, 2012. The evolutional course, character, and mechanism of Chinese new urban district since 1978. Modern Urban Research, 27(9): 80–85. (in Chinese)