Comparing co-evolution methods and their application to template-free protein structure prediction

Bioinformatics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 373-381

  De Oliveira, Saulo Henrique Pires ^a   Shi, Jiye ^b   Deane, Charlotte M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UCB PHARMA   (Belgium)

Author keywords

China; Chinese academy of sciences; Shanghai 201800; Shanghai institute of applied physics

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85018349760     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw618     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andreani, J. and Soding, J. (2015) bbcontacts: prediction of b-strand pairing from direct coupling patterns. Bioinformatics, btv041.
2. Braun, T. et al. (2015) Combining evolutionary information and an iterative sampling strategy for accurate protein structure prediction. PLoS Comput. Biol., 11, e1004661.
3. Chandonia, J.M. et al. (2004) The astral compendium in 2004. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D189-D192.
4. de Oliveira, S.H. et al. (2015) Building a better fragment library for de novo protein structure prediction. PloS One, 10, e0123998.
5. Ekeberg, M. et al. (2013) Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys. Rev. E, 87, 012707.
6. Feinauer, C. et al. (2014) Improving contact prediction along three dimensions. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10, e1003847.
7. Gobel, U. et al. (1994) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 18, 309-317.
8. Haas, J. et al. (2013) The protein model portala comprehensive resource for protein structure and model information. Database, 2013, bat031.
9. Hopf, T.A. et al. (2012) Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell, 149, 1607-1621.
10. Hopf, T.A. et al. (2015) Amino acid coevolution reveals three-dimensional structure and functional domains of insect odorant receptors. Nat. Commun., 6, 6077.
11. Johnson, L.S. et al. (2010) Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative hmm search procedure. BMC Bioinf., 11, 431.
12. Jones, D.T. et al. (2012) PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 28, 184-190.
13. Jones, D.T. et al. (2014) MetaPSICOV: Combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins. Bioinformatics, btu791.
14. Kajan, L. et al. (2014) Freecontact: fast and free software for protein contact prediction from residue co-evolution. BMC Bioinf., 15, 85.
15. Kamisetty, H. et al. (2013) Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue- residue contact predictions in a sequence-And structure-rich era. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 110, 15674-15679.
16. Kim, D.E. et al. (2014) One contact for every twelve residues allows robust and accurate topology-level protein structure modeling. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 82, 208-218.
17. Kosciolek, T. and Jones, D.T. (2014) De novo structure prediction of globular proteins aided by sequence variation-derived contacts. PloS One, 9, e92197.
18. Marks, D.S. et al. (2011) Protein 3d structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS One, 6, e28766.
19. Marks, D.S. et al. (2012) Protein structure prediction from sequence variation. Nat. Biotechnol., 30, 1072-1080.
20. Monastyrskyy, B. et al. (2015) New encouraging developments in contact prediction: Assessment of the casp11 results. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 2015, 131-144.
21. Morcos, F. et al. (2011) Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108, E1293-E1301.
22. Moult, J. et al. (2014) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (casp)round x. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 82, 1-6.
23. Nugent, T. and Jones, D.T. (2013) Membrane protein orientation and refinement using a knowledge-based statistical potential. BMC Bioinf., 14, 276.
24. Pazos, F. et al. (1997) A graphical interface for correlated mutations and other protein structure prediction methods. Comput. Appl. Biosci., 13, 319-321.
25. Ovchinnikov, S. et al. (2015) Large-scale determination of previously unsolved protein structures using evolutionary information. Elife, 4, e09248.
26. Remmert, M. et al. (2012) Hhblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by hmm-hmm alignment. Nat. Methods, 9, 173-175.
27. Schneider, M. and Brock, O. (2014) Combining physicochemical and evolutionary information for protein contact prediction, PloS one, 9, e108438.
28. Seemayer, S. et al. (2014) Ccmpredfast and precise prediction of protein residue- residue contacts from correlated mutations. Bioinformatics, 30, 3128-3130.
29. Skwark, M.J. et al. (2013) Pconsc: combination of direct information methods and alignments improves contact prediction. Bioinformatics, 29, 1815-1816.
30. Skwark, M.J. et al. (2014) Improved contact predictions using the recognition of protein like contact patterns. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10, e1003889.
31. Xu, J. and Zhang, Y. (2010) How significant is a protein structure similarity with tm-score=0.5? Bioinformatics, 26, 889-895.
32. Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J. (2004) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 57, 702-710.