The impact of intermittent retraction on paraspinal muscle function during lumbar surgery

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 20, 2010, Pages

  Datta, Gorav ^a   McGregor, Alison ^a   Medhi Zadeh, Siroos ^a   Khalil, Nofal ^a   Hughes, Sean P F ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

intermittent retraction; muscle birefringence; paraspinal muscle

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACK MUSCLE; BACKACHE; BIREFRINGENCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; ELECTROMYOGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOCHEMISTRY; HUMAN; INTERMITTENT MUSCLE RETRACTION; ISOMETRICS; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MUSCLE BIOPSY; MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCLE INJURY; MUSCLE REINNERVATION; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARAVERTEBRAL MUSCLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; BIOPSY; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77957346265     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181edea9c     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Gejo R, Kawaguchi Y, Kondoh T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats. Spine 2000; 25:941-6.
2. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Spinal changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1999;24:1023-8.
3. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar surgery: Part 1. Histological and histochemical analyses in rats. Spine 1994; 19:2590-7. (Pubitemid 24356464)
4. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: 2. Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 1994;19:2598-602. (Pubitemid 24356465)
5. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: a histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 1996;21:941-4.
6. Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine 1996;21: 2683-8.
7. Datta G, Gnanalingham KK, Peterson D, et al. Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction? Neurosurgery 2004;54:1413-20.
8. Taylor H, McGregor AH, Medhi-Zadeh S, et al. The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine 2002;27:2758-62.
9. Styf JR, Willen J. The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and avfter posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans. Spine 1998;23:354-8.
10. Airaksinen O, Herno A, Kaukanen E, et al. Density of lumbar muscles 4 years after decompressive spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 1996;5:193-7.
11. Hu Y, Leung HB, Lu WW, et al. Histologic and electrophysiological changes of the paraspinal muscle after spinal fusion: an experimental study. Spine 2008;33:1418-22.
12. Graver V, Haaland AK, Magnaes B, et al. Seven-year clinical follow-up after lumbar disc surgery: results and predictors of outcome. Br J Neurosurg 1999;13:178-84.
13. Jackson RK. The long-term effects of wide laminectomy for lumbar disc excision. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1971;53B:609-16.
14. Jonsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, et al. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: five-year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 1997;22:2938-44. (Pubitemid 28070639)
15. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, et al. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decom- pressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1996;21: 92-8.
16. Naylor A. The late results of laminectomy for lumbar disc prolapse: a review after ten to twenty five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974;56B:17-29.
17. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, et al. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 1993; 18:5:575-81.
18. Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson B. A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine 2000;25:2616-21.
19. Valencia FP, Munroe RR. An electromyographic study of the lumbar multi-fidus in men. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophsyiol 1985;25:205-21.
20. Haig AJ, Moffroid M, Henry S, et al. A technique for needle localisation in paraspinal muscles with cadaveric confirmation. Muscle Nerve 1991;14: 521-6.
21. Chayen J, Bitensky L. Practical Histochemistry. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 1991.
22. Darracott-Cankovic S, Wheeldon D, Cory-Pearce R, et al. Biopsy assessment of fifty hearts during transplantation. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 1987;93: 95-102.
23. Zanoli G, Stromqvist B, Jonsson B. Visual analogue scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine 2001;26:2375-80.
24. Fairbank JC. Use and abuse of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2007; 32:2787-9.
25. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000;25: 2940-52.
26. McGregor AH, Hughes SP. The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compressionin patients with low back pain. Part1: the assessment of outcome. Spine 2002;27:1465-70.
27. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: attempted meta-analysis of literature 1970-93. Spine 1992;17:1-8.
28. Weber BR, Grob D, Dvorak J, et al. Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine 1997;22:1765-72.
29. Darracott-Cankovic S, Stovin PG, Wheeldon D, et al. Effect of donor heart damage on survival after transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1989;3: 525-32.
30. Darracott-Cankovic S, Braimbridge MV, Chayen J. Biopsy assessment of preservation during open heart surgery with cold cardioplegic arrest. Adv Myocardiol 1983;4:497-504.
31. Leinonen V, Maatta S, Taimela S, et al. Paraspinal muscle denervation, paradoxically good lumbar endurance, and an abnormal flexion-extension cycle in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2003;28:324-31.
32. Barkhaus PE, Periquet MI, Nandedkar SD. Quantitative motor unit action potential analysis in paraspinal muscles. Muscle Nerve 1997;20:373-5.
33. Langrana NA, Lee CK. Isokinetic evaluation of trunk muscles. Spine 1984; 9:171-5.
34. Langrana NA, Lee CK, Alexander H, et al. Quantitative assessment of back strength using isokinetic testing. Spine 1984;9:287-90.
35. Smith SS, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, et al. Quantification of lumbar function. Part 1: isometric and multispeed isokinetic trunk strength measures in sagittal and axial planes in normal subjects. Spine 1985;10:757-64.
36. Beimborn DS, Morrisey MC. A review of the literature related to trunk muscle performance. Spine 1988;13:655-60.
37. Mayer TG, Smith SS, Keeley J, et al. Quantification of lumbar function. Part 2: sagittal plane trunk strength in chronic low-back pain patients. Spine 1985;10:765-72.