Automated segmentability index for layer segmentation of macular SD-OCT images

Translational Vision Science and Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 1-12

  Lee, Kyungmoo ^a,b   Buitendijk, Gabriëlle H S ^c   Bogunovic, Hrvoje ^a,b   Springelkamp, Henriët ^c   Hofman, Albert ^c,d   Wahle, Andreas ^a,b   Sonka, Milan ^a,b,e   Vingerling, Johannes R ^c   Klaver, Caroline C W ^c   Abràmoff, Michael D ^a,b,e,f  

^a University of Iowa   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d Netherlands Genomics Initiative   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^f VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Image quality; Intraretinal layer segmentation; Retinal nerve fiber layer; Segmentability index; Spectral domain optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE FIBER; POPULATION RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; RANDOM FOREST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELIABILITY; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; THICKNESS;

EID: 85018326270     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21642591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/tvst.5.2.14     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991; 254: 1178-1181.
2. Fujimoto J, Bouma B, Tearney G, et al. New technology for high speed and high resolution optical coherence tomography. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998; 838: 95-107.
3. van Velthoven ME, Faber DJ, Verbraak FD, et al. Recent developments in optical coherence tomography for imaging the retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007; 26: 57-77.
4. Mwanza JC, Budenz DL, Godfrey DG, et al. Diagnostic performance of optical coherence tomography ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measurements in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121: 849-854.
5. Sari ES, Ermis SS, Yazici A, et al. The effect of intracameral anesthesia on macular thickness and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness after uneventful phacoemulsification surgery: prospective and randomized controlled trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014; 252: 433-439.
6. Chen X, Zhang L, Sohn EH, et al. Quantification of external limiting membrane disruption caused by diabetic macular edema from SD-OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 8042-8048.
7. Zhang L, Lee K, Niemeijer M, et al. Automated segmentation of the choroid from clinical SDOCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 7510-7519.
8. Kay CN, Abramoff MD, Mullins RF, et al. Three-dimensional distribution of the vitelliform lesion, photoreceptors, and retinal pigment epithelium in the macula of patients with best vitelliform macular dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012; 130: 357-364.
9. van Dijk HW, Verbraak FD, Kok PH, et al. Decreased retinal ganglion cell layer thickness in patients with type 1 diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 3660-3665.
10. Ho J, Castro DP, Castro LC, et al. Clinical assessment of mirror artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 3714-3720.
11. Folio LS, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, et al. Variation in optical coherence tomography signal quality as an indicator of retinal nerve fibre layer segmentation error. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96: 514-518.
12. Stein DM, Ishikawa H, Hariprasad R, et al. A new quality assessment parameter for optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90: 186-190.
13. Huang Y, Gangaputra S, Lee KE, et al. Signal quality assessment of retinal optical coherence tomography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 2133-2141.
14. Darma S, Kok PH, van den Berg TJ, et al. Optical density filters modeling media opacities cause decreased SD-OCT retinal layer thickness measurements with inter-and intra-individual variation. Acta Ophthalmol. In press.
15. Cheung CY, Leung CK, Lin D, et al. Relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer measurement and signal strength in optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115: 1347-1351.
16. Wu Z, Vazeen M, Varma R, et al. Factors associated with variability in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114: 1505-1512.
17. Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, et al. Predictors of normal optic nerve head, retinal nerve fiber layer, and macular parameters measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 1103-1110.
18. Samarawickrama C, Pai A, Huynh SC, et al. Influence of OCT signal strength on macular, optic nerve head, and retinal nerve fiber layer parameters. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 4471-4475.
19. Hofman A, Darwish Murad S, van Duijn CM, et al. The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013; 28: 889-926.
20. Abràmoff MD, Garvin MK, Sonka M. Retinal imaging and image analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010; 3: 169-208.
21. Garvin MK, Abràmoff, Wu X, et al. Automated 3-D intraretinal layer segmentation of macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009; 28: 1436-47.
22. Lee K, Niemeijer M, Garvin MK, et al. Segmentation of the optic disc in 3-D OCT scans of the optic nerve head. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010; 29: 159-68.
23. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning. 2001; 45: 5-32.
24. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44: 837-845.