Editorial: Psychology and policy

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue MAR, 2017, Pages

  Ruggeri, Kai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behavioral sciences; Evidence based policy; Impact; Policy; Social norms

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018305739     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00497     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Choi, S. J., and Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Behavioral economics and the SEC. Stanfod Law Rev. 56, 1-73. Available online at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229682
2. Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., and Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: the new design orientation and policy formulation research. Policy Politics 43, 291-311. doi: 10.1332/147084414X13992869118596
3. Huppert, F. A. (2014). The State of Wellbeing Science. Wellbeing: John Wiley & Sons
4. Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., and Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Res. 14:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
5. Parks, C. D. (2014). "Determinants of cooperation in social dilemmas," in The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior, eds D. A. Schroeder and W. G. Graziano (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1-47
6. Parks, C. D., Joireman, J., and Van Lange, P. A. (2013). Cooperation, trust, and antagonism: how public goods are promoted. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 14, 119-165. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436
7. Ruggeri, K. (ed). (2016). Insights for Impact. Cambridge: University of Cambridge
8. Schneider, A., and Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. J. Polit. 52, 510-529. doi: 10.2307/2131904
9. Sunstein, C. R. (2015). On interesting policy makers. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 10, 764-767. doi: 10.1177/1745691615614257