Why Doesn't a Songbird (the European Starling) Use Pitch to Recognize Tone Sequences? The Informational Independence Hypothesis

Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 19-32

  Patel, Aniruddh D ^a,b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Psychology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Evolution; Music; Pitch; Songbirds; Speech

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018265899     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19114745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3819/CCBR.2017.120003     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abe, K., & Watanabe, D. (2011). Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1067-1074. doi:10.1038/ nn.2869
2. Bernard, D. J., & Hulse, S. H. (1992). Transfer of serial stimulus relations by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): Loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 323-344. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.18.4.323
3. Bizley, J. K., Walker, K. M., Silverman, B. W., King, A. J., & Schnupp, J. W. (2009). Interdependent encoding of pitch, timbre, and spatial location in auditory cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 2064-2075. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4755-08.2009
4. Braaten, R. F., & Hulse, S. H. (1991). A songbird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), shows perceptual constancy for acoustic spectral structure. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 105, 222-231. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.105.3.222
5. Bregman, M. R., Patel, A. D., & Gentner, T. Q. (2012). Stimulus-dependent flexibility in non-human auditory pitch processing. Cognition, 122, 51-60. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.008
6. Bregman, M. R., Patel, A. D., & Gentner, T. Q. (2016). Songbirds use spectral shape, not pitch, for sound pattern recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 1666-1671. doi:10.1073/ pnas.1515380113
7. Caclin, A., McAdams, S., Smith, B. K., & Winsberg, S. (2005). Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: A confirmatory study using synthetic tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 471-482. doi:10.1121/1.1929229
8. Calabrese, A., & Woolley, S. M. (2015). Coding principles of the canonical cortical microcircuit in the avian brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112, 3517-3522. doi:10.1073/pnas.1408545112
9. Carr, C. E. (1992). Evolution of the central auditory system in reptiles and birds. In D. B. Webster, R. R. Fay, & A. N. Popper (Eds.), The evolutionary biology of hearing (pp. 511-544). New York, NY: Springer- Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2784-7_32
10. Creel, S. C., & Tumlin, M. A. (2012). Online recognition of music is influenced by relative and absolute pitch information. Cognitive Science, 36, 224-260. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01206.x
11. Crespo-Bojorque, P., & Toro, J.M. (2016). Processing advantages for consonance: A comparison between rats (Rattus Norvegicus) and humans (Homo Sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130, 97-108. doi:10.1037/com0000027
12. Cynx, J., & Shapiro, M. (1986). Perception of missing fundamental by a species of songbird (Sturnus vulgaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 100, 356-360. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.100.4.356
13. D'Amato, M. R. (1988). A search for tonal pattern perception in cebus monkeys: Why monkeys can't hum a tune. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 453-480. doi:10.2307/40285410
14. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: John Murray.
15. Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 222-241. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222
16. de Waal, F. (2016). Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? New York, NY: Norton.
17. Dooling, R. J., Okanoya, K., Downing, J., & Hulse, S. (1986). Hearing in the starling (Sturnus vulgaris): Absolute thresholds and critical ratios. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 462-464. doi:10.3758/ BF03330584
18. Doupe, A. J. (1997). Song-and order-selective neurons in the songbird anterior forebrain and their emergence during vocal development. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1147-1167.
19. Elie, J. E., & Theunissen, F. E. (2016). The vocal repertoire of the domesticated zebra finch: A data-driven approach to decipher the informationbearing acoustic features of communication signals. Animal Cognition, 19, 285-315. doi:10.1007/ s10071-015-0933-6
20. Fitch, W. T. (2000). The evolution of speech: A comparative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 258-267. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01494-7
21. Fitch, W. T. (2015). Four principles of bio-musicology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370(1664), 20140091. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0091
22. Foster, N. E., & Zatorre, R. J. (2010). A role for the intraparietal sulcus in transforming musical pitch information. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 1350-1359. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp199
23. Fritz, J., Shamma, S., Elhilali, M., & Klein, D. (2003). Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1216-1223. doi:10.1038/nn1141
24. Gentner, T. Q., & Hulse, S. H. (1998). Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Animal Behaviour, 56, 579-594. doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0810
25. Gentner, T. Q., & Hulse, S. H. (2000). Female European starling preference and choice for variation in conspecific male song. Animal Behaviour, 59, 443-458. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1313
26. Hindmarsh, A. M. (1984). Vocal mimicry in starlings. Behaviour, 90, 302-324. doi:10.1163/156853984X00182
27. Hoeschele, M., Cook, R. G., Guillette, L. M., Brooks, D. I., & Sturdy, C. B. (2012). Black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) and human (Homo sapiens) chord discrimination. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 57-67. doi:10.1037/a0024627
28. Hoeschele, M., Cook, R. G., Guillette, L. M., Hahn, A. H., & Sturdy, C. B. (2014). Timbre influences chord discrimination in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) but not humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128, 387-401. doi:10.1037/a0037159
29. Hoeschele, M., Guillette, L. M., & Sturdy, C. B. (2012). Biological relevance of acoustic signal affects discrimination performance in a songbird. Animal Cognition, 15, 677-688. doi:10.1007/ s10071-012-0496-8
30. Hoeschele, M., Merchant, H., Kikuchi, Y., Hattori, Y., & ten Cate, C. (2015). Searching for the origins of musicality across species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370(1664), 20140094. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0094
31. Honing, H., ten Cate, C., Peretz, I., & Trehub, S. E. (2015). Without it no music: Cognition, biology and evolution of musicality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370(1664), 20140088. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0088
32. Hulse, S. H., Bernard, D. J., & Braaten, R. F. (1995). Auditory discrimination of chord-based spectral structures by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 409-423. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.4.409
33. Hulse, S. H., Cynx, J., & Humpal, J. (1984). Absolute and relative pitch discrimination in serial pitch perception by birds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 38-54. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.38
34. Hulse, S. H., Humpal, J., & Cynx, J. (1984). Discrimination and generalization of rhythmic and arrhythmic sound patterns by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 442-464. doi:10.2307/40285272
35. Hulse, S. H., Page, S. C., & Braaten, R. F. (1990). Frequency range size and the frequency range constraint in auditory perception by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 238-245. doi:10.3758/BF03205281
36. Hulse, S. H., Takeuchi, A. H., & Braaten, R. F. (1992). Perceptual invariances in the comparative psychology of music. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 151-184. doi:10.2307/40285605
37. Karten, H. (2013). Neocortical evolution: Neuronal circuits arise independently of lamination. Current Biology, 23, R12-R15. doi:10.1016/j. cub.2012.11.013
38. Klump, G. M., Langemann, U., & Gleich, O. (2000). The European starling as a model for understanding perceptual mechanisms. In G. A. Manley, H. Oeckinghaus, M. Koessl, G. M. Klump, & H. Fastl (Eds.), Auditory worlds: Sensory analysis and perception in animals and man (pp. 193-211). Weinheim, Germany: Verlag Chemie.
39. Ladd, D. R., Turnbull, R., Browne, C., Caldwell- Harris, C., Ganushchak, Swoboda, K., Dediu, D. (2013). Patterns of individual differences in the perception of missing-fundamental tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1386-1397. doi:10.1037/a0031261
40. Levitin, D. J. (1994). Absolute memory for musical pitch: Evidence from the production of learned melodies. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 414-423. doi:10.3758/BF03206733
41. Levitin, D. J., & Rogers, S. E. (2005). Absolute pitch: Perception, coding, and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 26-33. doi:10.1016/j. tics.2004.11.007
42. Marler, P. R., & Slabbekoorn, H. (2004). Nature's music: The science of birdsong. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/ B978-012473070-0/50000-1
43. McAdams, S. J. (2013). Musical timbre perception. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 35-67). London, UK: Academic Press/Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-381460-9.00002-X
44. Miller, C. T., Mandel, K., & Wang, X. (2010). The communicative content of the common marmoset phee call during antiphonal calling. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 974-980. doi:10.1002/ ajp.20854
45. Morton, E. S. (1977). On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. American Naturalist, 111, 855-869. doi:10.1086/283219
46. Norman-Haignere, S., Kanwisher, N., & McDermott, J. H. (2013). Cortical pitch regions in humans respond primarily to resolved harmonics and are located in specific tonotopic regions of anterior auditory cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 19451- 19469. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2880-13.2013
47. Okanoya, K. (2004). The Bengalese finch: A window on the behavioral neurobiology of birdsong syntax. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1016, 724-735. doi:10.1196/annals.1298.026
48. Ouattara, K., Lemasson, A., & Zuberbühler, K. (2009). Campbell's monkeys concatenate vocalizations into context-specific call sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 22026-22031. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908118106
49. Oxenham, A. J. (2013). The perception of musical tones. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 1-33). London, UK: Academic Press/ Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-381460-9.00001-8
50. Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51. Patel, A. D. (2014). The evolutionary biology of musical rhythm: Was Darwin wrong? PLoS Biology, 12(3), e1001821. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001821
52. Patel, A. D. (in press). Evolutionary music cognition: Cross-species studies. In D. Levitin & J. Rentfrow (Eds.), Foundations in music psychology: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Patel, A. D., & Demorest, S. (2013). Comparative music cognition: Cross-species and cross-cultural studies. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 647-681). London, UK: Academic Press/ Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-381460-9.00016-X
54. Pisanski, K., Cartei, V., McGettigan, C., Raine, J., & Reby, D. (2016). Voice modulation: A window into the origins of human vocal control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 304-318. doi:10.1016/j. tics.2016.01.002
55. Pistorio, A. L., Vintch, B., & Wang, X. (2006). Acoustic analysis of vocal development in a New World primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 1655-1670. doi:10.1121/1.2225899
56. Plantinga, J., & Trainor, L. J. (2005). Memory for melody: Infants use a relative pitch code. Cognition, 98, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.008
57. Riede, T., Schilling, N., & Goller, F. (2013). The acoustic effect of vocal tract adjustments in zebra finches. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 199, 57-69. doi:10.1007/s00359-012-0768-4
58. Rock, I., & Palmer, S. (1990). The legacy of Gestalt psychology. Scientific American, 263, 84-90. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1290-84
59. Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Arnold, K., Lemasson, A., Ouattara, K., Keenan, S., ... Zuberbühler, K. (2014). Monkey semantics: Two "dialects" of Campbell's monkey alarm calls. Linguistics and Philosophy 37, 439-501. doi:10.1007/ s10988-014-9155-7
60. Shannon, R. V. (2016). Is birdsong more like speech or music? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 245-247. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.02.004
61. Shannon, R. V., Fu, Q. J., & Galvin, J. (2004). The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 124, 50-54. doi:10.1080/03655230410017562
62. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F. G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303-304. doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.303
63. Song, X., Osmanski, M. S., Guo, Y., & Wang, X. (2016). Complex pitch perception mechanisms are shared by humans and a New World monkey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 781-786. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516120113
64. Stevens, K. N. (2000). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Sundberg, J. (1987). The science of the singing voice. DeKalb: University of Illinois Press.
66. Uno, H., Maekawa, M., & Kaneko, H. (1997). Strategies for harmonic structure discrimination by zebra finches. Behavioural Brain Research, 89, 225-228. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00064-8
67. Vignal, C., & Mathevon, N. (2011). Effect of acoustic cue modifications on evoked vocal response to calls in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 150-161. doi:10.1037/ a0020865
68. Warren, J. D., Jennings, A. R., & Griffiths, T. D. (2005). Analysis of the spectral envelope of sounds by the human brain. Neuroimage, 24, 1052-1057. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.031
69. Weisman, R. G., Njegovan, M. G., Williams, M. T., Cohen, J. S., & Sturdy, C. B. (2004). A behavior analysis of absolute pitch: Sex, experience, and species. Behavioural Processes, 66, 289-307. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.010
70. Weisman, R. G., Williams, M. T., Cohen, J. S., Njegovan, M. G., & Sturdy, C. B. (2006). The comparative psychology of absolute pitch. In T. Zentall & E. Wasserman (Eds.), Comparative cognition: Experimental explorations of animal intelligence (pp. 71-86). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
71. Wright, A. A., Rivera, J. J., Hulse, S. H., Shyan, M., & Neiworth, J. J. (2000). Music perception and octave generalization in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 291-307. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.291