The Perception of Musical Tones

The Psychology of Music

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-33

  Oxenham, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884438133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381460-9.00001-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (146)

1. Acoustical terminology. ANSI S1.1-1994 1994, American National Standards Institute, Author, New York, NY.
2. Arieh Y., Marks L.E. Recalibrating the auditory system: A speed-accuracy analysis of intensity perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:523-536.
3. Arieh Y., Marks L.E. Time course of loudness recalibration: Implications for loudness enhancement. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 114:1550-1556.
4. Attneave F., Olson R.K. Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling. American Journal of Psychology 1971, 84:147-166.
5. Beerends J.G., Houtsma A.J.M. Pitch identification of simultaneous diotic and dichotic two-tone complexes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989, 85:813-819.
6. Bendor D., Wang X. The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex. Nature 2005, 436:1161-1165.
7. Bernstein J.G., Oxenham A.J. Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: Harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 113:3323-3334.
8. Bernstein J.G., Oxenham A.J. An autocorrelation model with place dependence to account for the effect of harmonic number on fundamental frequency discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005, 117:3816-3831.
9. Bernstein J.G., Oxenham A.J. The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: Effects of stimulus level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120:3916-3928.
10. Bernstein J.G., Oxenham A.J. The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: Sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120:3929-3945.
11. Bizley J.K., Walker K.M., Silverman B.W., King A.J., Schnupp J.W. Interdependent encoding of pitch, timbre, and spatial location in auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:2064-2075.
12. Borchert E.M., Micheyl C., Oxenham A.J. Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:257-269.
13. Burns E.M., Viemeister N.F. Nonspectral pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1976, 60:863-869.
14. Burns E.M., Viemeister N.F. Played again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1981, 70:1655-1660.
15. Buus S., Muesch H., Florentine M. On loudness at threshold. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998, 104:399-410.
16. Cariani P.A., Delgutte B. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 76:1698-1716.
17. Carlyon R.P. Encoding the fundamental frequency of a complex tone in the presence of a spectrally overlapping masker. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996, 99:517-524.
18. Carlyon R.P. Comments on "A unitary model of pitch perception". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998, 104:1118-1121. [Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1811-1820 (1997)].
19. Carlyon R.P., Shackleton T.M. Comparing the fundamental frequencies of resolved and unresolved harmonics: Evidence for two pitch mechanisms?. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994, 95:3541-3554.
20. Cedolin L., Delgutte B. Spatiotemporal representation of the pitch of harmonic complex tones in the auditory nerve. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:12712-12724.
21. Chalupper J., Fastl H. Dynamic loudness model (DLM) for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 2002, 88:378-386.
22. Chen Z., Hu G., Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C. A new method of calculating auditory excitation patterns and loudness for steady sounds. Hearing Research 2011, 282(1-2):204-215.
23. Cohen M.A., Grossberg S., Wyse L.L. A spectral network model of pitch perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 98:862-879.
24. Dai H. On the relative influence of individual harmonics on pitch judgment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 107:953-959.
25. Daniel P., Weber R. Psychoacoustical roughness: Implementation of an optimized model. Acustica 1997, 83:113-123.
26. Darwin C.J. Pitch and auditory grouping. Pitch: Neural coding and perception 2005, 278-305. Springer Verlag, New York, NY. C.J. Plack, A.J. Oxenham, R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
27. Darwin C.J., Ciocca V. Grouping in pitch perception: Effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 91:3381-3390.
28. Darwin C.J., Hukin R.W., al-Khatib B.Y. Grouping in pitch perception: Evidence for sequential constraints. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 98:880-885.
29. de Boer E. On the "residue" in hearing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) 1956, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
30. de Cheveigné A. Pitch perception models. Pitch: Neural coding and perception 2005, 169-233. Springer Verlag, New York, NY. C.J. Plack, A.J. Oxenham, A.N. Popper, R. Fay (Eds.).
31. de Cheveigné A., Pressnitzer D. The case of the missing delay lines: Synthetic delays obtained by cross-channel phase interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 119:3908-3918.
32. Demany L., Ramos C. On the binding of successive sounds: perceiving shifts in nonperceived pitches. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005, 117:833-841.
33. Durlach N.I., Braida L.D. Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1969, 46:372-383.
34. Epstein M., Florentine M. A test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005, 118:907-913.
35. Faulkner A. Pitch discrimination of harmonic complex signals: Residue pitch or multiple component discriminations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1985, 78:1993-2004.
36. Fechner G.T. Elemente der psychophysik 1860, Vol. 1. Breitkopf und Haertl, Leipzig, Germany.
37. Fletcher H., Munson W.A. Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1933, 5:82-108.
38. Fletcher H., Munson W.A. Relation between loudness and masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1937, 9:1-10.
39. Florentine M., Buus S., Robinson M. Temporal integration of loudness under partial masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998, 104:999-1007.
40. Gabriel B., Kollmeier B., Mellert V. Influence of individual listener, measurement room and choice of test-tone levels on the shape of equal-loudness level contours. Acustica 1997, 83:670-683.
41. Galambos R., Bauer J., Picton T., Squires K., Squires N. Loudness enhancement following contralateral stimulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1972, 52(4):1127-1130.
42. Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hearing Research 1990, 47:103-138.
43. Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. A model of loudness applicable to time-varying sounds. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 2002, 50:331-341.
44. Gockel H., Carlyon R.P., Plack C.J. Across-frequency interference effects in fundamental frequency discrimination: Questioning evidence for two pitch mechanisms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, 116:1092-1104.
45. Goldstein J.L. An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1973, 54:1496-1516.
46. Griffiths T.D., Buchel C., Frackowiak R.S., Patterson R.D. Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the human brain. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1:422-427.
47. Griffiths T.D., Uppenkamp S., Johnsrude I., Josephs O., Patterson R.D. Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:633-637.
48. Hall D.A., Plack C.J. Pitch processing sites in the human auditory brain. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19:576-585.
49. Hartmann W.M., Goupell M.J. Enhancing and unmasking the harmonics of a complex tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120:2142-2157.
50. Heinz M.G., Colburn H.S., Carney L.H. Evaluating auditory performance limits: I. One-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve. Neural Computation 2001, 13:2273-2316.
51. Hellman R.P. Growth of loudness at 1000 and 3000Hz. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1976, 60:672-679.
52. Hellman R.P., Zwislocki J. Loudness function of a 1000-cps tone in the presence of a masking noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1964, 36:1618-1627.
53. Helmholtz H.L.F. On the sensations of tone 1885/1954, Dover, New York, NY, (A. J. Ellis, Trans.).
54. Henning G.B. Frequency discrimination of random amplitude tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1966, 39:336-339.
55. Houtsma A.J.M., Smurzynski J. Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990, 87:304-310.
56. Huron D. Voice denumerability in polyphonic music of homogenous timbres. Music Perception 1989, 6:361-382.
57. Jesteadt W., Wier C.C., Green D.M. Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1977, 61:169-177.
58. Kaernbach C., Bering C. Exploring the temporal mechanism involved in the pitch of unresolved harmonics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2001, 110:1039-1048.
59. Kameoka A., Kuriyagawa M. Consonance theory part I: Consonance of dyads. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1969, 45:1451-1459.
60. Kameoka A., Kuriyagawa M. Consonance theory part II: Consonance of complex tones and its calculation method. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1969, 45:1460-1469.
61. Keuss P.J., van der Molen M.W. Positive and negative effects of stimulus intensity in auditory reaction tasks: Further studies on immediate arousal. Acta Psychologica 1982, 52:61-72.
62. Kohfeld D.L. Simple reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity in decibels of light and sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 88:251-257.
63. Kohlrausch A., Fassel R., Dau T. The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 108:723-734.
64. Langner G., Schreiner C.E. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. Journal of Neurophysiology 1988, 60:1799-1822.
65. Liberman A.M., Isenberg D., Rakerd B. Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode. Perception & Psychophysics 1981, 30:133-143.
66. Licklider J.C., Webster J.C., Hedlun J.M. On the frequency limits of binaural beats. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1950, 22:468-473.
67. Licklider J.C.R. A duplex theory of pitch perception. Experientia 1951, 7:128-133.
68. Loeb G.E., White M.W., Merzenich M.M. Spatial cross correlation: A proposed mechanism for acoustic pitch perception. Biological Cybernetics 1983, 47:149-163.
69. Luce R.D., Green D.M. A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity. Psychological Review 1972, 79:14-57.
70. Mapes-Riordan D., Yost W.A. Loudness recalibration as a function of level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999, 106:3506-3511.
71. Marks L.E. "Recalibrating" the auditory system: The perception of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:382-396.
72. Mauermann M., Long G.R., Kollmeier B. Fine structure of hearing threshold and loudness perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, 116:1066-1080.
73. McDermott J.H., Lehr A.J., Oxenham A.J. Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance. Current Biology 2010, 20:1035-1041.
74. Meddis R., Hewitt M. Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity studied of a computer model of the auditory periphery. I: Pitch identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1991, 89:2866-2882.
75. Meddis R., O'Mard L. A unitary model of pitch perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 102:1811-1820.
76. Micheyl C., Bernstein J.G., Oxenham A.J. Detection and F0 discrimination of harmonic complex tones in the presence of competing tones or noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120:1493-1505.
77. Micheyl C., Delhommeau K., Perrot X., Oxenham A.J. Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination. Hearing Research 2006, 219:36-47.
78. Micheyl C., Keebler M.V., Oxenham A.J. Pitch perception for mixtures of spectrally overlapping harmonic complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2010, 128:257-269.
79. Micheyl C., Oxenham A.J. Further tests of the "two pitch mechanisms" hypothesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 113:2225.
80. Miller G.A. The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychology Review 1956, 63:81-96.
81. Moore B.C.J. Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1973, 54:610-619.
82. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990, 87:2163-2177.
83. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A revision of Zwicker's loudness model. Acustica 1996, 82:335-345.
84. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neuroscience 1997, 3:289-311.
85. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Baer T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 1997, 45:224-240.
86. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Peters R.W. Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1985, 77:1853-1860.
87. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Peters R.W. Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1986, 80:479-483.
88. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Vickers D.A. Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999, 106:898-907.
89. Moore B.C.J., Gockel H.E. Resolvability of components in complex tones and implications for theories of pitch perception. Hearing Research 2011, 276:88-97.
90. Moore B.C.J., Peters R.W. Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 91:2881-2893.
91. Moore B.C.J., Se{ogonek}k A. Sensitivity of the human auditory system to temporal fine structure at high frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009, 125:3186-3193.
92. Noesselt T., Tyll S., Boehler C.N., Budinger E., Heinze H.J., Driver J. Sound-induced enhancement of low-intensity vision: Multisensory influences on human sensory-specific cortices and thalamic bodies relate to perceptual enhancement of visual detection sensitivity. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:13609-13623.
93. Oberfeld D. Loudness changes induced by a proximal sound: Loudness enhancement, loudness recalibration, or both?. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2007, 121:2137-2148.
94. Odgaard E.C., Arieh Y., Marks L.E. Cross-modal enhancement of perceived brightness: Sensory interaction versus response bias. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:123-132.
95. Odgaard E.C., Arieh Y., Marks L.E. Brighter noise: Sensory enhancement of perceived loudness by concurrent visual stimulation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4:127-132.
96. Oxenham A.J., Bernstein J.G.W., Penagos H. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2004, 101:1421-1425.
97. Oxenham A.J., Buus S. Level discrimination of sinusoids as a function of duration and level for fixed-level, roving-level, and across-frequency conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 107:1605-1614.
98. Oxenham A.J., Micheyl C., Keebler M.V., Loper A., Santurette S. Pitch perception beyond the traditional existence region of pitch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2011, 108:7629-7634.
99. Palmer A.R., Russell I.J. Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells. Hearing Research 1986, 24:1-15.
100. Patterson R.D. The effects of relative phase and the number of components on residue pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1973, 53:1565-1572.
101. Penagos H., Melcher J.R., Oxenham A.J. A neural representation of pitch salience in non-primary human auditory cortex revealed with fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24:6810-6815.
102. Plack C.J. Loudness enhancement and intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996, 100:1024-1030.
103. Pitch: Neural coding and perception 2005, Springer Verlag, New York, NY. C.J. Plack, A.J. Oxenham, A.N. Popper, R. Fay (Eds.).
104. Plomp R., Levelt W.J.M. Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1965, 38:548-560.
105. Poulton E.C. Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading. British Journal of Psychology 1977, 68:409-425.
106. Poulton E.C. Models for the biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychology Bulletin 1979, 86:777-803.
107. Pressnitzer D., Patterson R.D., Krumbholz K. The lower limit of melodic pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2001, 109:2074-2084.
108. Relkin E.M., Doucet J.R. Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count?. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 101:2735-2741.
109. Ritsma R.J. Existence region of the tonal residue. I. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1962, 34:1224-1229.
110. Robinson D.W., Dadson R.S. A re-determination of the equal-loudness relations for pure tones. British Journal of Applied Physics 1956, 7:166-181.
111. Rose J.E., Brugge J.F., Anderson D.J., Hind J.E. Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 1967, 30:769-793.
112. Scharf B. Partial masking. Acustica 1964, 14:16-23.
113. Scharf B., Buus S., Nieder B. Loudness enhancement: Induced loudness reduction in disguise? (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002, 112:807-810.
114. Schouten J.F. The residue and the mechanism of hearing. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen 1940, 43:991-999.
115. Schouten J.F., Ritsma R.J., Cardozo B.L. Pitch of the residue. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1962, 34:1418-1424.
116. Schutz M., Kubovy M. Causality and cross-modal integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:1791-1810.
117. Schutz M., Lipscomb S. Hearing gestures, seeing music: Vision influences perceived tone duration. Perception 2007, 36:888-897.
118. Seebeck A. Beobachtungen über einige Bedingungen der Entstehung von Tönen. Annals of Physical Chemistry 1841, 53:417-436.
119. Shackleton T.M., Carlyon R.P. The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994, 95:3529-3540.
120. Shamma S., Klein D. The case of the missing pitch templates: How harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 107:2631-2644.
121. Shinn-Cunningham B.G., Lee A.K., Oxenham A.J. A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2007, 104:12223-12227.
122. Shofner W.P. Comparative aspects of pitch perception. Pitch: Neural coding and perception 2005, 56-98. Springer Verlag, New York, NY. C.J. Plack, A.J. Oxenham, R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
123. Stein B.E., London N., Wilkinson L.K., Price D.D. Enhancement of perceived visual intensity by auditory stimuli: A psychophysical analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8:497-506.
124. Stevens S.S. On the psychophysical law. Psychology Review 1957, 64:153-181.
125. Suzuki Y., Takeshima H. Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, 116:918-933.
126. Terhardt E. On the perception of periodic sound fluctuations (roughness). Acustica 1974, 30:201-213.
127. Terhardt E. Pitch, consonance, and harmony. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1974, 55:1061-1069.
128. Terhardt E. Psychoakustich begründetes Konzept der musikalischen Konsonanz. Acustica 1976, 36:121-137.
129. Terhardt E. The concept of musical consonance, a link between music and psychoacoustics. Music Perception 1984, 1:276-295.
130. Trainor L.J., Heinmiller B.M. The development of evaluative responses to music: Infants prefer to listen to consonance over dissonance. Infant Behavior and Development 1998, 21:77-88.
131. Tramo M.J., Cariani P.A., Delgutte B., Braida L.D. Neurobiological foundations for the theory of harmony in western tonal music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2001, 930:92-116.
132. van de Par S., Kohlrausch A. A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 101:1671-1680.
133. Verschuure J., van Meeteren A.A. The effect of intensity on pitch. Acustica 1975, 32:33-44.
134. Viemeister N.F. Auditory intensity discrimination at high frequencies in the presence of noise. Science 1983, 221:1206-1208.
135. Viemeister N.F., Bacon S.P. Intensity discrimination, increment detection, and magnitude estimation for 1-kHz tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 84:172-178.
136. Wallace M.N., Rutkowski R.G., Shackleton T.M., Palmer A.R. Phase-locked responses to pure tones in guinea pig auditory cortex. Neuroreport 2000, 11:3989-3993.
137. Warren R.M. Elimination of biases in loudness judgements for tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1970, 48:1397-1403.
138. Wightman F.L. The pattern-transformation model of pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1973, 54:407-416.
139. Winckel F.W. Optimum acoustic criteria of concert halls for the performance of classical music. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1962, 34:81-86.
140. Winter I.M. The neurophysiology of pitch. Pitch: Neural coding and perception 2005, 99-146. Springer Verlag, New York, NY. C.J. Plack, A.J. Oxenham, R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
141. Winter I.M., Wiegrebe L., Patterson R.D. The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea-pig. Journal of Physiology 2001, 537:553-566.
142. Zentner M.R., Kagan J. Perception of music by infants. Nature 1996, 383:29.
143. Zentner M.R., Kagan J. Infants' perception of consonance and dissonance in music. Infant Behavior and Development 1998, 21:483-492.
144. Zwicker E. Ein Verfahren zur Berechnung der Lautstärke. Acustica 1960, 10:304-308.
145. Zwicker E. Über die Lautheit von ungedrosselten und gedrosselten Schallen. Acustica 1963, 13:194-211.
146. Zwicker E., Fastl H., Dallmayr C. BASIC-Program for calculating the loudness of sounds from their 1/3-oct. band spectra according to ISO 522B. Acustica 1984, 55:63-67.