Songbirds use spectral shape, not pitch, for sound pattern recognition

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1666-1671

  Bregman, Micah R ^a   Patel, Aniruddh D ^b   Gentner, Timothy Q ^c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d NEUROBIOLOGY SECTION   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Absolute pitch; Comparative cognition; Pattern perception; Pitch processing; Songbirds

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; HEARING; MUSIC; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SIGNAL DETECTION; SOUND; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND RELATED PHENOMENA; SPECTRAL SHAPE; STURNUS VULGARIS; TIMBRE; ANIMAL; PHYSIOLOGY; STARLING;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; NOISE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PITCH PERCEPTION; SOUND; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; STARLINGS;

EID: 84958212225     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1515380113     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Comins JA, Gentner T.Q. (2014) Temporal pattern processing in songbirds. Curr Opin Neurobiol 28:179-187.
2. Doupe AJ, Kuhl P.K. (1999) Birdsong and human speech: Common themes and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci 22:567-631.
3. Fee MS, Scharff C. (2010) The songbird as a model for the generation and learning of complex sequential behaviors. ILAR J 51(4):362-377.
4. Rohrmeier M, Zuidema W, Wiggins G.A., Scharff C. (2015) Principles of structure building in music, language and animal song. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370 (1664):20140097.
5. Karten HJ (2013) Neocortical evolution: Neuronal circuits arise independently of lamination. Curr Biol 23(1):R12-R15.
6. Carr CE (1992) Evolution of the central auditory system in reptiles and birds. The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing, eds Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp 511-544.
7. Wang Y, Brzozowska-Prechtl A, Karten H.J. (2010) Laminar and columnar auditory cortex in avian brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(28):12676-12681.
8. Jarvis ED, et al; Avian Brain Nomenclature Consortium (2005) Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(2):151-159.
9. Dugas-Ford J., Rowell JJ, Ragsdale C.W. (2012) Cell-type homologies and the origins of the neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(42):16974-16979.
10. Calabrese A, Woolley S.M. (2015) Coding principles of the canonical cortical microcircuit in the avian brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(11):3517-3522.
11. Riede T, Goller F. (2010) Peripheral mechanisms for vocal production in birds - Differences and similarities to human speech and singing. Brain Lang 115(1):69-80.
12. Tierney AT, Russo FA, Patel A.D. (2011) The motor origins of human and avian song structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(37):15510-15515.
13. Petkov CI, Jarvis E.D. (2012) Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: Behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates. Front Evol Neurosci 4:12.
14. Reiner A, et al; Avian Brain Nomenclature Forum (2004) Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei. J Comp Neurol 473(3):377-414.
15. Dooling RJ (1986) Perception of vocal signals by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Exp Biol 45(3):195-218.
16. Klump GM, Langemann U, Gleich O. (2000) The European starling as a model for understanding perceptual mechanisms. Auditory Worlds: Sensory Analysis and Perception in Animals and Man, eds Manley GA, Oeckinghaus H, Koessl M, Klump GM, Fastl H (Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany), pp 193-211.
17. Langemann U, Klump GM, Dooling R.J. (1995) Critical bands and critical-ratio bandwidth in the European starling. Hear Res 84(1-2):167-176.
18. Cynx J, Shapiro M. (1986) Perception of missing fundamental by a species of songbird (Sturnus vulgaris). J Comp Psychol 100(4):356-360.
19. Itatani N, Klump G.M. (2014) Neural correlates of auditory streaming in an objective behavioral task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(29):10738-10743.
20. MacDougall-Shackleton S.A., Hulse SH, Gentner T.Q., White W. (1998) Auditory scene analysis by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): Perceptual segregation of tone sequences. J Acoust Soc Am 103(6):3581-3587.
21. Baptista LF, Keister R.A. (2005) Why birdsong is sometimes like music. Perspect Biol Med 48(3):426-443.
22. Bregman MR, Patel AD, Gentner T.Q. (2012) Stimulus-dependent flexibility in nonhuman auditory pitch processing. Cognition 122(1):51-60.
23. Nicolai J, Gundacker C, Teeselink K., Güttinger HR (2014) Human melody singing by bullfinches (Pyrrhula pyrrula) gives hints about a cognitive note sequence processing. Anim Cogn 17(1):143-155.
24. West MJ, King A.P. (1990) Mozart's starling. Am Sci 78(2):106-114.
25. Brown S, Jordania J. (2013) Universals in the world's musics. Psychol Music 41(2): 229-248.
26. Patel AD, Demorest S.M. (2013) Comparative music cognition: Cross-species and crosscultural studies. The Psychology of Music, ed Deutsch D (Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego), 3rd Ed, pp 647-681.
27. Plantinga J, Trainor L.J. (2005) Memory for melody: Infants use a relative pitch code. Cognition 98(1):1-11.
28. McDermott JH, Lehr AJ, Oxenham A.J. (2008) Is relative pitch specific to pitch? Psychol Sci 19(12):1263-1271.
29. Hulse SH, Cynx J, Humpal J. (1984) Absolute and relative pitch discrimination in serial pitch perception by birds. J Exp Psychol Gen 113(1):38-54.
30. Page SC, Hulse SH, Cynx J. (1989) Relative pitch perception in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): Further evidence for an elusive phenomenon. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 15(2):137-146.
31. Hoeschele M, Guillette LM, Sturdy C.B. (2012) Biological relevance of acoustic signal affects discrimination performance in a songbird. Anim Cogn 15(4):677-688.
32. Njegovan M, Weisman R. (1997) Pitch discrimination in field- and isolation-reared black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). J Comp Psychol 111(3):294-301.
33. Hulse SH, Cynx J. (1985) Relative pitch perception is constrained by absolute pitch in songbirds (Mimus, Molothrus, and Sturnus). J Comp Psychol 99(2):176-196.
34. Cynx J, Hulse SH, Polyzois S. (1986) A psychophysical measure of pitch discrimination loss resulting from a frequency range constraint in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 12(4):394-402.
35. Hulse SH, Kline C.L. (1993) The perception of time relations in auditory tempo discrimination. Anim Learn Behav 21(3):281-288.
36. Bernard DJ, Hulse S.H. (1992) Transfer of serial stimulus relations by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): Loudness. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 18(4):323-334.
37. Hulse SH, Takeuchi AH, Braaten R.F. (1992) Perceptual invariances in the comparative psychology of music. Music Percept 10(2):151-184.
38. Weisman RG, Njegovan MG, Williams M.T., Cohen JS, Sturdy C.B. (2004) A behavior analysis of absolute pitch: Sex, experience, and species. Behav Processes 66(3):289-307.
39. Weisman RG, Williams MT, Cohen J.S., Njegovan MG, Sturdy C.B. (2006) The comparative psychology of absolute pitch. Comparative Cognition: Experimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence, eds Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (Oxford University Press, New York), pp 71-88.
40. Adret-Hausberger M., Jenkins P.F. (1988) Complex organization of the warbling song in starlings. Behaviour 107(3):138-156.
41. McAdams S (2013) Musical timbre perception. The Psychology of Music, ed Deutsch D (Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA), pp 765-767.
42. Braaten RF, Hulse S.H. (1991) A songbird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), shows perceptual constancy for acoustic spectral structure. J Comp Psychol 105(3): 222-231.
43. Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, Wygonski J., Ekelid M. (1995) Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270 (5234):303-304.
44. Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones J.A., Zeng F.G. (2004) Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 25(2):173-185.
45. Hoeschele M, Cook RG, Guillette L.M., Hahn AH, Sturdy C.B. (2014) Timbre influences chord discrimination in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) but not humans (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 128(4):387-401.
46. Krumhansl CL, Iverson P. (1992) Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(3):739-751.
47. Melara RD, Marks L.E. (1990) Perceptual primacy of dimensions: Support for a model of dimensional interaction. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16(2):398-414.
48. Pitt MA, Crowder R.G. (1992) The role of spectral and dynamic cues in imagery for musical timbre. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(3):728-738.
49. Caruso VC, Balaban E. (2014) Pitch and timbre interfere when both are parametrically varied. PLoS One 9(1):e87065.
50. Pitt MA (1994) Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20(5):976-986.
51. Bahr N, Christensen CA, Bahr M. (2005) Diversity of accuracy profiles for absolute pitch recognition. Psychol Music 33(1):58-93.
52. Hedger SC, Heald SL, Nusbaum H.C. (2013) Absolute pitch may not be so absolute. Psychol Sci 24(8):1496-1502.
53. Hulse SH, Bernard DJ, Braaten R.F. (1995) Auditory discrimination of chord-based spectral structures by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). J Exp Psychol Gen 124(4): 409-423.
54. Hervais-Adelman A.G., Davis MH, Johnsrude I.S., Taylor KJ, Carlyon R.P. (2011) Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37(1):283-295.
55. Shannon RV, Fu QJ, Galvin J, 3rd (2004) The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (552):50-54.
56. Davis MH, Johnsrude IS, Hervais-Adelman A, Taylor K., McGettigan C. (2005) Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. J Exp Psychol Gen 134(2):222-241.
57. Davis MH, Johnsrude I.S. (2003) Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J Neurosci 23(8):3423-3431.
58. Gentner TQ (2008) Temporal scales of auditory objects underlying birdsong vocal recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 124(2):1350-1359.